E92,B7 etc etc
26 February 2016, 09:21 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
E92,B7 etc etc
I love cars.Too much.Just so much wish people wouldnt use the nonsense model numbers the makers use.
How's about,looked at a 2005 Audi RS4.The thickos amongst us can work that out then!
How's about,looked at a 2005 Audi RS4.The thickos amongst us can work that out then!
26 February 2016, 09:30 PM
#2
if you were to look into the VAG P/N system its very easy to work out what parts are interchangeable for example, so a switch or sensor from a Seat will fit an Audi, it also helps open up more options when searching for parts if you have a basic understanding of how the numbers are broken down.
hth
26 February 2016, 11:22 PM
#3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
So blooming confusing! In Fact even the fact my 318 d had a 2.0 diesel engine.Expected a 1.8
Life used to be a bit simpler!
Life used to be a bit simpler!
Last edited by lozgti1; 26 February 2016 at 11:25 PM.
27 February 2016, 07:27 AM
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sunny Abu Dhabi!
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
27 February 2016, 07:27 PM
#6
Trending Topics
28 February 2016, 07:58 AM
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sunny Abu Dhabi!
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whilst I appreciate it might be confusing, it is necessary to have different codes to distinguish between different versions of the same model car, eg. E30/E36/E46/E90/E92/E93 M3. If there were no codes and an M3 was being discussed, it would be necessary to ask which model, and then which shape (coupe, saloon, convertible, etc). By saying E92 M3, it immediately makes it clear exactly which model M3 is being referred to. I guess a simpler way could be mark I, mark II, mark III, etc.
Something I find far more annoying and confusing is the weird model numbering system of some cars. The Germans seem to be particularly bad for it, like Steve's example of the 1-series 2.0L, above. I'm sure Mercedes cars used to have a logical numbering system, eg. an SL280 had a 2.8L engine, but now I haven't a clue what size engine half of them have. A C63 AMG has a 6.2L block, the SL65 is 6.0L I believe, and the new S500 coupe is a 4.7L. And BMW is no better, with a 325, 330, and 335 all having a 3.0L engine. When I was looking for an M135i, my old man commented it was a small car to have a 3.5L engine, which I guess is a fair assumption to make.
It would be a lot easier if all cars were labelled as either the size of their engine or power (BHP/PS), like the Evo FQ series or Ford ST models... well, there or thereabouts.
Something I find far more annoying and confusing is the weird model numbering system of some cars. The Germans seem to be particularly bad for it, like Steve's example of the 1-series 2.0L, above. I'm sure Mercedes cars used to have a logical numbering system, eg. an SL280 had a 2.8L engine, but now I haven't a clue what size engine half of them have. A C63 AMG has a 6.2L block, the SL65 is 6.0L I believe, and the new S500 coupe is a 4.7L. And BMW is no better, with a 325, 330, and 335 all having a 3.0L engine. When I was looking for an M135i, my old man commented it was a small car to have a 3.5L engine, which I guess is a fair assumption to make.
It would be a lot easier if all cars were labelled as either the size of their engine or power (BHP/PS), like the Evo FQ series or Ford ST models... well, there or thereabouts.
Know what you mean about Mercedes - our ML63 has a twin-turbo 5.5 V8!
Interestingly, in the Middle East - Audi have changed the badging on the back of their cars to represent power output, not engine size.
Here is an article about it:-
https://automan.me/am/brandwatch/201...enclature.html
It means you can get an Audi A5 in Dubai as a 35 or 50!
Cheers
Steve
28 February 2016, 09:19 AM
#9
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
My head is spinning! My friend has a 6 series convertible diesel twin turbo.Badge bears no resemblance to the engine
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post