Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

Clio V6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16 May 2002, 03:30 PM
  #1  
wrxeat
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
wrxeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

So how quick are these, to 60 is it much quicker than the 172?
Old 16 May 2002, 03:47 PM
  #2  
druddle
Scooby Regular
 
druddle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 5,528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I think theres a couple of tenths in it, but not enough to warrant 10k more !!

Still, they look the part !!

Dave
Old 16 May 2002, 04:40 PM
  #3  
warrtster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
warrtster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bromley
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

...they sound as well
Old 16 May 2002, 05:24 PM
  #4  
Phill
Scooby Regular
 
Phill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Not to mention past 60 the V6 would come into it's element, and the torque figures would be way different, tunning potential for big BHP figures is better with a 3.0 l V6 as opposed a 2.0l four.

But the consensus is that the Clio 172 is the better value for money buy !! as someody put it not really 10k better !

Phill
Old 16 May 2002, 10:32 PM
  #5  
47 NAT
Scooby Regular
 
47 NAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: In a village in Hants
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I took a few pics of one at the RSOC Epsom day (in the car park)last Sunday and must admit it looked the mutts nuts Though I cant imagine who would want to spend approx £10k more over the 172 Sport to get not much more in front from the stats I've seen at the Pod and brochures....

Wasn't there one advetised recently very cheap?

Nath
Old 17 May 2002, 09:10 AM
  #6  
Rich D
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
Rich D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lancs, UK
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Ok, my mate has one of these and it is not as quick as you would expect and basically it is very similar to a 172 performance wise.

Here are some pics of it...








Basically it looks good, it sounds superb and it attracts a *lot* of attention, but the performance is like a 172 due to the weight of the thing.

Also, handling is "interesting" especially in the wet!

Old 17 May 2002, 01:49 PM
  #7  
wrxeat
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
wrxeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

They do look good must admit.

Just found out 172 0-60 is 7.1 and V6 0-60 is 6.4 I think

Thought the V6 would be faster though....
Old 17 May 2002, 09:28 PM
  #8  
mk2escortcossie
Scooby Regular
 
mk2escortcossie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Tested a V6 for a week, not overfast but loads a fun, You could go Lands end to John o Groats sideways if you wanted,
Fun factor- 10 out of 10
Practicallity- get a 172
Old 17 May 2002, 09:29 PM
  #9  
mk2escortcossie
Scooby Regular
 
mk2escortcossie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Tested a V6 for a week, not overfast but loads a fun, You could go Lands end to John o Groats sideways if you wanted,
Fun factor- 10 out of 10
Practicallity- get a 172
Old 17 May 2002, 09:59 PM
  #10  
bluenose172
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
bluenose172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Spec C - 12.5 @ 110(340/350)
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Evo tested the V6 at 5.7 to 60!
Old 18 May 2002, 07:48 AM
  #11  
MARK MORRIS
Scooby Regular
 
MARK MORRIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

i tried to get a test drive about 14 months ago, dealer in swansea would get in touch when they had a demo, still waiting
mark
Old 18 May 2002, 01:30 PM
  #12  
subevo
Scooby Regular
 
subevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

redline magazine had one at crail dragstrip.i got 14.6secs for the quarter mile.the clio v6 got 15.5secs.my impretza was a standard uk 99wagon.
Old 20 May 2002, 02:55 PM
  #13  
wrxeat
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
wrxeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

So V6's aren't that quick in standard spec but tuning potental
is massive, bring on the nitrous!!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alcazar
Non Scooby Related
10
10 September 2015 01:26 PM
druddle
Non Scooby Related
1
16 July 2001 11:05 AM
Philsykes
ScoobyNet General
4
13 May 2001 02:26 PM



Quick Reply: Clio V6



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:45 AM.