Clio V6
#4
Not to mention past 60 the V6 would come into it's element, and the torque figures would be way different, tunning potential for big BHP figures is better with a 3.0 l V6 as opposed a 2.0l four.
But the consensus is that the Clio 172 is the better value for money buy !! as someody put it not really 10k better !
Phill
But the consensus is that the Clio 172 is the better value for money buy !! as someody put it not really 10k better !
Phill
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: In a village in Hants
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I took a few pics of one at the RSOC Epsom day (in the car park)last Sunday and must admit it looked the mutts nuts Though I cant imagine who would want to spend approx £10k more over the 172 Sport to get not much more in front from the stats I've seen at the Pod and brochures....
Wasn't there one advetised recently very cheap?
Nath
Wasn't there one advetised recently very cheap?
Nath
#6
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lancs, UK
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, my mate has one of these and it is not as quick as you would expect and basically it is very similar to a 172 performance wise.
Here are some pics of it...
Basically it looks good, it sounds superb and it attracts a *lot* of attention, but the performance is like a 172 due to the weight of the thing.
Also, handling is "interesting" especially in the wet!
Here are some pics of it...
Basically it looks good, it sounds superb and it attracts a *lot* of attention, but the performance is like a 172 due to the weight of the thing.
Also, handling is "interesting" especially in the wet!
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post