ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum

ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum (https://www.scoobynet.com/)
-   Other Marques (https://www.scoobynet.com/other-marques-33/)
-   -   Clio V6 (https://www.scoobynet.com/other-marques-33/96625-clio-v6.html)

wrxeat 16 May 2002 03:30 PM

So how quick are these, to 60 is it much quicker than the 172?

druddle 16 May 2002 03:47 PM

I think theres a couple of tenths in it, but not enough to warrant 10k more !!

Still, they look the part !!

Dave

warrtster 16 May 2002 04:40 PM

...they sound :cool: as well :D

Phill 16 May 2002 05:24 PM

Not to mention past 60 the V6 would come into it's element, and the torque figures would be way different, tunning potential for big BHP figures is better with a 3.0 l V6 as opposed a 2.0l four.

But the consensus is that the Clio 172 is the better value for money buy !! as someody put it not really 10k better !

Phill

47 NAT 16 May 2002 10:32 PM

I took a few pics of one at the RSOC Epsom day (in the car park)last Sunday and must admit it looked the mutts nuts :D Though I cant imagine who would want to spend approx £10k more over the 172 Sport to get not much more in front from the stats I've seen at the Pod and brochures....

Wasn't there one advetised recently very cheap?

Nath

Rich D 17 May 2002 09:10 AM

Ok, my mate has one of these and it is not as quick as you would expect and basically it is very similar to a 172 performance wise.

Here are some pics of it...

http://members.lycos.co.uk/Pug106GTi...0Clio%2006.jpg

http://members.lycos.co.uk/Pug106GTi...0Clio%2005.jpg

http://members.lycos.co.uk/Pug106GTi...0Clio%2004.jpg


Basically it looks good, it sounds superb and it attracts a *lot* of attention, but the performance is like a 172 due to the weight of the thing.

Also, handling is "interesting" especially in the wet! ;)


wrxeat 17 May 2002 01:49 PM

They do look good must admit.

Just found out 172 0-60 is 7.1 and V6 0-60 is 6.4 I think

Thought the V6 would be faster though....

mk2escortcossie 17 May 2002 09:28 PM

Tested a V6 for a week, not overfast but loads a fun, You could go Lands end to John o Groats sideways if you wanted,
Fun factor- 10 out of 10
Practicallity- get a 172

mk2escortcossie 17 May 2002 09:29 PM

Tested a V6 for a week, not overfast but loads a fun, You could go Lands end to John o Groats sideways if you wanted,
Fun factor- 10 out of 10
Practicallity- get a 172

bluenose172 17 May 2002 09:59 PM

Evo tested the V6 at 5.7 to 60!

MARK MORRIS 18 May 2002 07:48 AM

i tried to get a test drive about 14 months ago, dealer in swansea would get in touch when they had a demo, still waiting
mark

subevo 18 May 2002 01:30 PM

redline magazine had one at crail dragstrip.i got 14.6secs for the quarter mile.the clio v6 got 15.5secs.my impretza was a standard uk 99wagon.

wrxeat 20 May 2002 02:55 PM

So V6's aren't that quick in standard spec but tuning potental
is massive, bring on the nitrous!!!


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:48 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands