Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

Golf 2.3 V5 or 2.8 V6 4motion?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11 August 2005, 03:54 PM
  #1  
talizman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
talizman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 5,947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Golf 2.3 V5 or 2.8 V6 4motion?

A friend is looking to buy a Golf, and asked my advice re the above.

I recommended the V6 due to more power and torque, albeit some will be lost through the 4 wheel drive.

The V5 has 170bhp and 166lb/ft as opposed to the V6's 204bhp and 199lb/ft, yet Evo magazine rate the V5 4 stars, and the V6 3 stars

Anyone got any idea which is the better buy and why the V5 gets a better review?
Old 11 August 2005, 05:23 PM
  #2  
Petem95
Scooby Regular
 
Petem95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wouldnt say the V5 is better just because EVO give it one more star. It may be that they thought the V6 was too pricey or something.

A mate has a V6-4motion and its excellent - swift and smooth, and sounds lovely when you cane it. The V5 will of course be slower, but probably cheaper to buy. Boils down to what he can afford I would think.
Old 11 August 2005, 05:41 PM
  #3  
talizman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
talizman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 5,947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petem95
I wouldnt say the V5 is better just because EVO give it one more star. It may be that they thought the V6 was too pricey or something.

A mate has a V6-4motion and its excellent - swift and smooth, and sounds lovely when you cane it. The V5 will of course be slower, but probably cheaper to buy. Boils down to what he can afford I would think.
I don't know how much slower (if any) the V5 will be.....

V5 is 144bhp/tonne and V6 is 148bhp/tonne.

Take into account transmission losses in the 4wd and they are probably pretty similar.

I'd imagine the V6 will be marginally quicker off the line though....
Old 11 August 2005, 05:51 PM
  #4  
cat7
Scooby Regular
 
cat7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default i'd take the v6 every time

Originally Posted by talizman
A friend is looking to buy a Golf, and asked my advice re the above.

I recommended the V6 due to more power and torque, albeit some will be lost through the 4 wheel drive.

The V5 has 170bhp and 166lb/ft as opposed to the V6's 204bhp and 199lb/ft, yet Evo magazine rate the V5 4 stars, and the V6 3 stars

Anyone got any idea which is the better buy and why the V5 gets a better review?
I had the v6 before the scoob and its a great engine the V6 super smooth, though thirsty. The v5 get smoky with age and if you drive them both I would say the majority would go for the v6. Lots around of both and are quite a cheap second hand, just check all the warranty work has been done form coil packs to rear boot locks to etc etc etc
Old 11 August 2005, 06:02 PM
  #5  
talizman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
talizman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 5,947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cat7
I had the v6 before the scoob and its a great engine the V6 super smooth, though thirsty. The v5 get smoky with age and if you drive them both I would say the majority would go for the v6. Lots around of both and are quite a cheap second hand, just check all the warranty work has been done form coil packs to rear boot locks to etc etc etc
How thirsty cat?
Old 11 August 2005, 06:17 PM
  #6  
J4CKO
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
J4CKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Have heard that the V5 isnt the most reliable. No facts just that it isnt very reliable !
Old 11 August 2005, 07:46 PM
  #7  
cat7
Scooby Regular
 
cat7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default about the same as the scoob

Originally Posted by talizman
How thirsty cat?
I got about mid 20's mixed up to 28-30 on a steady run on the motorway. Drops down to low twenties, high teens when canning it.
Old 11 August 2005, 08:34 PM
  #8  
Simon S3
Scooby Regular
 
Simon S3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I`ve owned three Mk4 Golfs.....
a 1.8T, a V5 (170bhp) and a 150bhp TDI.

The V5 was the least enjoyable, it just felt very lazy. OK it sounded good but that was about it.

I`d go for a V6 over a V5 any day.
Old 11 August 2005, 08:48 PM
  #9  
TAINTON
Scooby Regular
 
TAINTON's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old man swapped his mk3 gti 16v for a V5 and in his opinion it was a much bettter car. More of a cruiser and could just give it some boot without dropping down.

Fuel mainly around the mid 20's as suggested and his only problem was with the climate control which took vw forever to locate.

Was told by VW that between V5 & V6 there would be that much in it....V6 but just marginal.

Best of luck
Old 11 August 2005, 09:38 PM
  #10  
Daz1121
Scooby Regular
 
Daz1121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Personally I'd go for the V6 as this was one of the cars on my shortlist recently but got the Impreza instead.
Old 11 August 2005, 09:45 PM
  #11  
finnie
Scooby Regular
 
finnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I used to have a V6, such a nice car but suspension and 4wd is CRAP and I mean CRAP. If he gets one make sure it has the sports suspension pack. Standard is far far far too soft. I bottomed the car on bouncy roads loads. 4WD system is very very unpredictable. If you hammer it around a tight wet junction (to see how it copes - this is what I tried) you first get understeer then grumble grumble twitch twitch then big oversteer and then it finally sorts itself out. All enough to get a little bit of poo on the seat I can tell you. Off the line its fantastic even if only two wheels on gravel. You get a touch of wheel spin while it thinks about things and then you are off like a bat out of h3ll.

A great but flawed car.

For me 23mpg around town and AC sapped loads of power too.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TECHNOPUG
General Technical
11
21 September 2015 05:42 PM
STEVECHAPS
ScoobyNet General
12
05 September 2001 06:13 PM
ollyshorey
ScoobyNet General
17
12 August 2001 11:32 PM
elondan
ScoobyNet General
4
07 December 2000 07:21 AM



Quick Reply: Golf 2.3 V5 or 2.8 V6 4motion?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:00 PM.