Avin' a Larf!
#1
Avin' a Larf!
Let's assume that a Company didn't allow its workers onto its sites during the heavy snow and ice of Xmas week - even though some workers turned up.
Now that those employees are back to work, they find out that the employers are forcing them to make the lost time up!
What would you think about that then? Supposing you struggled in, got turned away at the gate, then find out you have to work an extra 2 1/2 days (that's about 20 hours) to make up the time!!
I think it's bang out of order!
Now that those employees are back to work, they find out that the employers are forcing them to make the lost time up!
What would you think about that then? Supposing you struggled in, got turned away at the gate, then find out you have to work an extra 2 1/2 days (that's about 20 hours) to make up the time!!
I think it's bang out of order!
Last edited by SunnySideUp; 04 January 2010 at 01:23 PM.
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's life I suppose. A company cannot take the risk of an employee slipping in the snow and injuring themselves, as this will leave the company open to being taken to court.
Better to have to work extra hard to make up lost time than to be made redundant because someone has fallen and injured themselves, sued the company, which can no longer afford to pay the insurance premium, thus making everyone renundant.
Better to have to work extra hard to make up lost time than to be made redundant because someone has fallen and injured themselves, sued the company, which can no longer afford to pay the insurance premium, thus making everyone renundant.
#6
That's life I suppose. A company cannot take the risk of an employee slipping in the snow and injuring themselves, as this will leave the company open to being taken to court.
Better to have to work extra hard to make up lost time than to be made redundant because someone has fallen and injured themselves, sued the company, which can no longer afford to pay the insurance premium, thus making everyone renundant.
Better to have to work extra hard to make up lost time than to be made redundant because someone has fallen and injured themselves, sued the company, which can no longer afford to pay the insurance premium, thus making everyone renundant.
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: No, don't tell me, i know this one.
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you a member of a Union?
Anyway,the thing is, i can see that the employer isn't in control of the weather obviously, but neither are his/her employees, but they are looking to make them pay for it just the same, not alot of sympathy from his employer is there? Not the best way to start the year. omo btw.
Anyway,the thing is, i can see that the employer isn't in control of the weather obviously, but neither are his/her employees, but they are looking to make them pay for it just the same, not alot of sympathy from his employer is there? Not the best way to start the year. omo btw.
Last edited by Quasi Modo; 04 January 2010 at 02:46 PM.
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My mate in the same situation does this, and the lads need to make up the time or lose out some wage, to be honest, i think its a bit of a dodgy grey area.
The benefits for my mate are that he is not paying people to sit about and do nothing, personally i provide them with a tv/radio/ps2 and let them entertain themselves, if they have some spare holidays then they can usually take them upon short notice and have the day off.
While its the "right" thing to do, sometimes it does **** me off when i am basically paying them to play on the playstation all weekend (like this weekend just gone)
The benefits for my mate are that he is not paying people to sit about and do nothing, personally i provide them with a tv/radio/ps2 and let them entertain themselves, if they have some spare holidays then they can usually take them upon short notice and have the day off.
While its the "right" thing to do, sometimes it does **** me off when i am basically paying them to play on the playstation all weekend (like this weekend just gone)
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Forgot to add something, my mate whom i mentioned above has a wifey that is involved in HR, the company she works for has now banned the staff from gritting the works car park.
The reason?
apparently....
If you do not grit the car park and somebody crashes/falls over, no blame can be given.
If you put even the slightest amount of grit down, then you can be liable for not doing it well enough and blame can be placed on you.
It says a lot about the UK in general now IMO
The reason?
apparently....
If you do not grit the car park and somebody crashes/falls over, no blame can be given.
If you put even the slightest amount of grit down, then you can be liable for not doing it well enough and blame can be placed on you.
It says a lot about the UK in general now IMO
#11
Are you a member of a Union?
Anyway,the thing is, i can see that the employer isn't in control of the weather obviously, but neither are his/her employees, but they are looking to make them pay for it just the same, not alot of sympathy from his employer is there? Not the best way to start the year. omo btw.
Anyway,the thing is, i can see that the employer isn't in control of the weather obviously, but neither are his/her employees, but they are looking to make them pay for it just the same, not alot of sympathy from his employer is there? Not the best way to start the year. omo btw.
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: England
Posts: 2,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would you pay somebody for 2 days if in those 2 days no work was done?
To be honest forcing it is a bit unfair, but if i was the boss I'd not pay for those 2 days as the company would have made no money or had nothing productive done, but i'd give staff the option to work the extra hours should they wish.
To be honest forcing it is a bit unfair, but if i was the boss I'd not pay for those 2 days as the company would have made no money or had nothing productive done, but i'd give staff the option to work the extra hours should they wish.
#14
Would you pay somebody for 2 days if in those 2 days no work was done?
To be honest forcing it is a bit unfair, but if i was the boss I'd not pay for those 2 days as the company would have made no money or had nothing productive done, but i'd give staff the option to work the extra hours should they wish.
To be honest forcing it is a bit unfair, but if i was the boss I'd not pay for those 2 days as the company would have made no money or had nothing productive done, but i'd give staff the option to work the extra hours should they wish.
#16
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mb
#17
I suspect that they are acting illegally IMO.
If people made themselves available for work, but were turned away (some had travelled over 50 miles in the ice and snow!) .... I don't think they should work the hours lost!
Bang out of order in my opinion!
If people made themselves available for work, but were turned away (some had travelled over 50 miles in the ice and snow!) .... I don't think they should work the hours lost!
Bang out of order in my opinion!
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
If you turn up to work and the employer says you are not needed those days that is their loss, not the employees and so no the employee should not be asked to make up the hours. I don't know who you lot work for but christ sounds like you are walked all over thinking that behaviour is acceptable from your employer.
#19
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: on sunny ibiza ocean beach
Posts: 5,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well ive been made tu work today -10 the gas plant were we work was like a skating ring no grit and its a accident waiting too happen with 20 hgvs in it been like that for the last 3 weeks
#20
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Would you pay somebody for 2 days if in those 2 days no work was done?
To be honest forcing it is a bit unfair, but if i was the boss I'd not pay for those 2 days as the company would have made no money or had nothing productive done, but i'd give staff the option to work the extra hours should they wish.
To be honest forcing it is a bit unfair, but if i was the boss I'd not pay for those 2 days as the company would have made no money or had nothing productive done, but i'd give staff the option to work the extra hours should they wish.
As for making people make up the hours, I don't think it's very fair at all. I can see why they have done it, but the weather is nobody's fault, and while the business may not want to be out of pocket, it forced people who had bothered to make the journey into that situation. It would be fair enough, if they said, 'if you are unable to make it into work, you can make up the hours at another time'.
I was annoyed on Christmas Eve. Our boss decided on that day to close the shop early, nice you may think. Oh no, never just do something nice. We were docked for that hour, even though we were given no choice in the matter. One hours pay might seem like nothing to most people here but when low paid, it makes a difference. But for me, it was more about principal.
#21
You have two rights at work, your statutory rights and your contract of employment.
Personally, I would be going through my employee handbook and policies to see if I signed on the dotted line, so to speak., you may well find out it is all in black and white in a situation like this.
Personally, I would be going through my employee handbook and policies to see if I signed on the dotted line, so to speak., you may well find out it is all in black and white in a situation like this.
Last edited by Dedrater; 04 January 2010 at 08:11 PM.
#22
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Posts: 21,415
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes as it goes i am a union member (unite) and also a shop steward with respect to his/hers employers as far as i am concerned if they send you home after you have made yourself available for work then you should be paid it was their choice to make the loss by sending everyone home so they should honour it and bear in mind a company cannot i repeat cannot make its employees work longer than their weekly/monthly contracted hours of work.
If what the o.p. says happened to me, I'd possibly ask to use any holidays or lieu days (if of benefit to myself) to cover them. Failing that I'd politely remind them I'm available for any reasonable duties until my contracted hours are up (but thats as I'm strict 8-4pm at the minute).
#23
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Posts: 21,415
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was annoyed on Christmas Eve. Our boss decided on that day to close the shop early, nice you may think. Oh no, never just do something nice. We were docked for that hour, even though we were given no choice in the matter. One hours pay might seem like nothing to most people here but when low paid, it makes a difference. But for me, it was more about principal.
My Mrs is in the same union as me and had a similar thing last year. Was due to work 4 hours on Xmas eve on normal pay - not a problem. But they refused to pay her for the other 4 hours, even though she made it clear it wasn't part of her contract for the company to simply let them go home early and not pay them. She put a grievance in officially through the correct channels and they paid out under advice from their solicitor. They simply try the funny stuff on with non union members now, but leave my Mrs alone funnily enough.
#24
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
I'm not in the union, as they have been very little help to those who are.
I don't think it says anything in my contract about such issues, but I would have to check to be sure. Anyhow, I wouldn't take it so far over an hours pay. I'm annoyed, and as much as I'm all for standing up for my rights, it's hardly worth the agro for one hour.
I don't think it says anything in my contract about such issues, but I would have to check to be sure. Anyhow, I wouldn't take it so far over an hours pay. I'm annoyed, and as much as I'm all for standing up for my rights, it's hardly worth the agro for one hour.
#25
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Posts: 21,415
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not in the union, as they have been very little help to those who are.
I don't think it says anything in my contract about such issues, but I would have to check to be sure. Anyhow, I wouldn't take it so far over an hours pay. I'm annoyed, and as much as I'm all for standing up for my rights, it's hardly worth the agro for one hour.
I don't think it says anything in my contract about such issues, but I would have to check to be sure. Anyhow, I wouldn't take it so far over an hours pay. I'm annoyed, and as much as I'm all for standing up for my rights, it's hardly worth the agro for one hour.
#26
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Thats exactly what your bosses will assume, so if you're happy with the situation then no action needs take place I guess. After the way I was treated by my former employers, I scrutinise every move/change/alteration very carefully now. Can't help it unfortunately. Hopefully for you it may be a little more relaxed and a bit of give & take.
#27
Let's assume that a Company didn't allow its workers onto its sites during the heavy snow and ice of Xmas week - even though some workers turned up.
Now that those employees are back to work, they find out that the employers are forcing them to make the lost time up!
What would you think about that then? Supposing you struggled in, got turned away at the gate, then find out you have to work an extra 2 1/2 days (that's about 20 hours) to make up the time!!
I think it's bang out of order!
Now that those employees are back to work, they find out that the employers are forcing them to make the lost time up!
What would you think about that then? Supposing you struggled in, got turned away at the gate, then find out you have to work an extra 2 1/2 days (that's about 20 hours) to make up the time!!
I think it's bang out of order!
Les
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Warrington
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ACAS
There is a general right at common law to tell most employees not to turn up for work but no general right not to pay them.
Daily Telegraph
There is a general right at common law to tell most employees not to turn up for work but no general right not to pay them.
Daily Telegraph
Last edited by speedking; 05 January 2010 at 01:27 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gojonnyjo
Ireland & Northern Ireland
2
30 April 2010 12:14 AM