Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Clever scientific answer needed....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12 May 2006, 02:24 PM
  #1  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Clever scientific answer needed....

When cycling with my mates, who are all quite a bit taller than me, I always seem to be struggling to keep up. Is there a scientific reason why shorter legs would require more effort to cover the same distance, or am I just not as fit as them?
Old 12 May 2006, 02:31 PM
  #2  
root
BANNED
 
root's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: root@biotech
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you take two limbs, one shorter, one longer, that both have the same muscles then the shorter limb will have more mechanical advantage due to the principle of leverage. However, the longer limb will have more swept movement for a given muscle contraction.

What this essentially means is that your short **** legs are running in a lower gear. You have more mechanical advantage but your muscles must make larger movements in order to rotate the pedals.

Changing up a gear on the bike should counteract this effect.

The total energy expended should be the same for all of you, however. (Assuming identical bikes, weight, efficiency etc)

Then again you could just be an unfit sloth!
Old 12 May 2006, 02:34 PM
  #3  
Jonathan Davies
Scooby Regular
 
Jonathan Davies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Joan Crawford
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Long legs = big levers. Miguel Indurain had huge long thighs.
Old 12 May 2006, 02:35 PM
  #4  
lightning101
Scooby Regular
 
lightning101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Never do names esp. Joey, spaz or Mong
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Eddy Merckx was only 5ft 2
Old 12 May 2006, 02:37 PM
  #5  
FlightMan
Scooby Regular
 
FlightMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lightning101
Eddy Merckx was only 5ft 2
Indeed. But his thighs were 4'6"!
Old 12 May 2006, 02:38 PM
  #6  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

At least I'm taller than Eddie then!
Old 12 May 2006, 02:40 PM
  #7  
comic cuts
Scooby Regular
 
comic cuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Holder of six fairy tokens, from the land of green ginger
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Scientifically speaking:

Drink less beer!



CC
Old 12 May 2006, 02:41 PM
  #8  
lightning101
Scooby Regular
 
lightning101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Never do names esp. Joey, spaz or Mong
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've no idea how tall eddy is
Old 12 May 2006, 02:41 PM
  #9  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
When cycling with my mates, who are all quite a bit taller than me, I always seem to be struggling to keep up.
Is this you on the left? If so, I might have found the reason.

Old 12 May 2006, 02:43 PM
  #10  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LOL, no 2nd from the right in the blue hat!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frizzle-Dee
Essex Subaru Owners Club
13
09 March 2019 07:35 PM
WrxSti03
Drivetrain
11
29 September 2015 10:21 AM
ALEXSTI
General Technical
5
28 September 2015 09:29 PM
hedgecutter
ScoobyNet General
4
25 September 2015 11:42 AM



Quick Reply: Clever scientific answer needed....



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:10 AM.