for those who support less tax on fuel
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 3,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
for those who support less tax on fuel
register on this site www.lesstaxonfuel.co.uk it's free, download the poster and put it in the car to show your support maybe we can make this government open their eyes to the power of the people!
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, if they reduce tax on fuel, where do you suggest they get the money from instead then?
The country needs a certain amount of money to operate, and if you remove a big chunk of money like this, either they'll have to cut back on public services, or raise taxes elsewhere to compensate.
Just interested to hear your solution...
The country needs a certain amount of money to operate, and if you remove a big chunk of money like this, either they'll have to cut back on public services, or raise taxes elsewhere to compensate.
Just interested to hear your solution...
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlkKnight
surely the logical aproach would be to have a "fixed" tax on fuel - rather than a percentile?
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I still haven't heard anyone suggest where they would get the money instead though. Fuel taxes contribute a hell of a lot to the economy every year, and so if this was cut, there would be a huge black hole to fill in the treasury. Either something would have to go, or taxes would be raised elsewhere. Simple economics....
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Iain Young
I still haven't heard anyone suggest where they would get the money instead though. Fuel taxes contribute a hell of a lot to the economy every year, and so if this was cut, there would be a huge black hole to fill in the treasury. Either something would have to go, or taxes would be raised elsewhere. Simple economics....
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 9,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Iain Young
I still haven't heard anyone suggest where they would get the money instead though. Fuel taxes contribute a hell of a lot to the economy every year, and so if this was cut, there would be a huge black hole to fill in the treasury. Either something would have to go, or taxes would be raised elsewhere. Simple economics....
#11
Originally Posted by SiDHEaD
They could "cut" it to a level where they don't receive an increase. They aren't therefore losing anything but their "increase".
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Iain Young
I still haven't heard anyone suggest where they would get the money instead though. Fuel taxes contribute a hell of a lot to the economy every year, and so if this was cut, there would be a huge black hole to fill in the treasury. Either something would have to go, or taxes would be raised elsewhere. Simple economics....
#13
Scooby Regular
Iain, you're assuming the don't collect enough tax from elsewhere or don't waste it on poor administration or White Elephants (like the Dome or the Scottish Parliament).
Is it simple economics or bad accounting??
Do the Goverment publish actual taxation figures for the Public to see where it all comes from and where it all goes??
The Government can do something about fuel prices. Maybe they should ease the burden on the public by reducing tax or dipping into some reserves in the budget. Or they could simply shrug their shoulders and let us lot pay for it. Afterall we're used to just accepting things with a stiff upper lip.
Stefan
Is it simple economics or bad accounting??
Do the Goverment publish actual taxation figures for the Public to see where it all comes from and where it all goes??
The Government can do something about fuel prices. Maybe they should ease the burden on the public by reducing tax or dipping into some reserves in the budget. Or they could simply shrug their shoulders and let us lot pay for it. Afterall we're used to just accepting things with a stiff upper lip.
Stefan
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ozzy
or dipping into some reserves in the budget.
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But surely it's not as simple as that. They could reduce duty etc to compensate for the VAT, but that does not mean the government will get the same amount of income as a result. You also have to factor rising costs, inflation etc into the equation. The value of money is not static.
I agree that the government wastes a lot of money. However, this cannot be fixed overnight (it's simply not feasible), and I'm not sure that this administration is capable of doing so anyway. If they reduce the amount of money coming into the treasury, then there will be an even bigger black hole than there is now, thus requiring tax rises in other places to try and cope with the shortfall.
This problem is much bigger than just the current price / tax level of fuel. It has more to do with the way the country is being run, and the huge leech that is the benefit system. Trouble is that for anyone who tried to tackle this, it would be political suicide for them and their party (the benefit loving chavs would never vote for it).
I agree that the government wastes a lot of money. However, this cannot be fixed overnight (it's simply not feasible), and I'm not sure that this administration is capable of doing so anyway. If they reduce the amount of money coming into the treasury, then there will be an even bigger black hole than there is now, thus requiring tax rises in other places to try and cope with the shortfall.
This problem is much bigger than just the current price / tax level of fuel. It has more to do with the way the country is being run, and the huge leech that is the benefit system. Trouble is that for anyone who tried to tackle this, it would be political suicide for them and their party (the benefit loving chavs would never vote for it).
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: www.cumbrianscoobs.co.uk/bbs
Posts: 4,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
but how can you justify 15p per litre over the last 6 months? its just an easy way for them to take money off the public. the price of peterol now is just plane stupid, and wont help the economy one bit
#17
Originally Posted by FASTER MIKE!!
but how can you justify 15p per litre over the last 6 months? its just an easy way for them to take money off the public. the price of peterol now is just plane stupid, and wont help the economy one bit
#18
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Surely it is a clever plan to heavily tax fuel.
Everything used for transport needs fuel, everything that ends up for sale on the high street needs transport to get it there. All manufacturers need to make a profit so the cost of transportation gets passed back to the customer - everything from a loaf of bread to car parts need transport to get them onto the shelves.
Government don't directly control the price of fuel leaving the refinery, but the increased fuel prices will have a knock on effect on the price of most other things and there is 17.5% share of those increses going back to Government. So really we end up paying twice when the oil prices go up.
How long before we are back to daylight tax????
TT
Everything used for transport needs fuel, everything that ends up for sale on the high street needs transport to get it there. All manufacturers need to make a profit so the cost of transportation gets passed back to the customer - everything from a loaf of bread to car parts need transport to get them onto the shelves.
Government don't directly control the price of fuel leaving the refinery, but the increased fuel prices will have a knock on effect on the price of most other things and there is 17.5% share of those increses going back to Government. So really we end up paying twice when the oil prices go up.
How long before we are back to daylight tax????
TT
#19
Originally Posted by PG
a wee poster in your car is going to have them quivering in their boots.
#21
Originally Posted by scoobyboy
for every £50 you put in your tank the government take £37 it says on that site, do you think thats fair? i certainly don't.
At £1/litre, the goverment are only taking just over £31 of your £50. You probably still think that's bad, but at least it's factual.
That site is updated daily, yet they fail to update that price statistic. Bit norty. Propoganda at its best.
Last edited by imlach; 13 September 2005 at 09:47 PM.
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: www.cumbrianscoobs.co.uk/bbs
Posts: 4,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by imlach
..of which, only 2.625p of that 15p goes to the government....the oil companies are taking the other 12.375p.
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Croydon (ish)
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like the bit where poor people cant clutter up the roads
I sadly dont think any form of protest will make the slightest impact on the Government. And blocking refineries isnt the best way to stop the wheels of power from turning. Blair will still be whisked away in his 65 litre Jag. Complete with double glazed windows. He'll just turn the radio up a notch.
Also people ask where we'll get the Tax income from if they reduced fuel to 50% tax. But the other major European countries seem to manage. Maybe its that Labour arent very good at keeping the books straight.
And on that subject. Why is it always people that havent run businesses that are given key Government jobs. If Sir Richard Branson ran for PM Id vote for him in an instant. At least he could make the place run profitably. Same as Bernie Ecclestone, Conran and others
I sadly dont think any form of protest will make the slightest impact on the Government. And blocking refineries isnt the best way to stop the wheels of power from turning. Blair will still be whisked away in his 65 litre Jag. Complete with double glazed windows. He'll just turn the radio up a notch.
Also people ask where we'll get the Tax income from if they reduced fuel to 50% tax. But the other major European countries seem to manage. Maybe its that Labour arent very good at keeping the books straight.
And on that subject. Why is it always people that havent run businesses that are given key Government jobs. If Sir Richard Branson ran for PM Id vote for him in an instant. At least he could make the place run profitably. Same as Bernie Ecclestone, Conran and others
#28
Originally Posted by FASTER MIKE!!
the government get 67% duty the VAT is on top of the duty
Fuel duty is 47.1p/litre.
At £1/litre, VAT is 14.9p.
That makes 62p, which is 62% of £1.
#29
They should cut taxes on petrol by half.
Then, to recoup the money, they could stop spending it on
a) millenium domes
b) benefits (for people that don't deserve them)
c) supporting illegal imigrants
d) tv's and snooker tables for prisoners
e) food for prisoners
f) medication for prisoners
g) prisoners
...and the could instead tax
a) push bikes on the road
b) horses on the road
c) old people on the road (200% normal tax)
Then, to recoup the money, they could stop spending it on
a) millenium domes
b) benefits (for people that don't deserve them)
c) supporting illegal imigrants
d) tv's and snooker tables for prisoners
e) food for prisoners
f) medication for prisoners
g) prisoners
...and the could instead tax
a) push bikes on the road
b) horses on the road
c) old people on the road (200% normal tax)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM