Senior_AP

As title.

Referencing my thread "Strong political stance"

D.K.1

Oh, so I suppose *I* will be classed as "antisocial" because I have three


WTF does it matter to anyone else how many kids someone else has?


We don't *all* go scrounging benefits off the government you know

Diablo

Only if you let them run riot in public places

weapon69

Senior AP-There is probably loads of men who think like you and don't want children. So you're doing your bit for the UK population. Well done

Graz

More than 0 is antisocial when I'm in the supermarket etc. and the little gits are screaming and generally being an annoyance.

Used to get a slap for that sort of behaviour when I were a lad...

Senior_AP

I think from this point onwards it is somewhat anti-social. Not individually but we need to ease up as things are getting mad. Population is growing exponentially.

If you already have 3 then thats that.

Senior_AP

I do want children, I look forward to it a great deal.

mark_h

I don't think Michael Jackson is very popular with the amount of kids he's had

Senior_AP

PMSL. He (if guilty) is very selfish!!

weapon69

Don't be so selfish S_AP!! Think of the population

Senior_AP

Have you actually read this thread by any chance??

Not one to assume, but I can only assume you haven't.

weapon69

You should never assume.

Petem95

More needs to be done to get the right people having kids. Currently educated hard working couples probably cant afford to have kids, but chavs on the dole are almost encouraged to breed like rabbits to claim more benefits (remember that wife-swap a while ago?) The kids they have end up roaming the streets up to no good.

Also same with asylum seekers - they come over, have kids asap then they cant be deported, and then seem to have loads more as often in the poorer countries theyve come from its the norm to have lots of kids, so thats what they continue to do.

Stereotypical examples, but clearly happening.

Senior_AP

So you haven't then.

Make particular reference to the comments about "more than 2 children".

Senior_AP

Exactly why this country is getting more and more peasant-ville by the day.

The state should say after 2 children we will not give benefits. That way people who don't scrounge can continue and the peasants can go f$ck themselves. They'll have to do something else to make money. Like robbing or breeding Staffodshire terriers.

Tiggs

i have 3 kids and yes...its antisocial


people should have to pay to have extra kids.

we seem to value life very oddly nowadays. if we really value life then lets put a price on it. £500 baby licence, £1000 for 2, £5000 for 3

we need to wake up and smell the coffee.......teenage slappers with kids are a bloody waste. abortion should be the obvious option here yet it seems the default choice is for slapper grany to help out and say it'll be ok.

we are like a bunch of kids asking the farmer not to drown the runty pig!

Tiggs

once you have 2 kids a vasectomy should be offered so you have no excuse!

fast bloke

which is fair enough cos chances are granny is now about 28 and enough of a grown up to raise kids

Senior_AP

<Senior_AP shakes Tiggs' hand>

Old_Fart

I should be getting paid to breed, Britain needs more of my superior genes.
Cman
(3 kids)

MattW

Not exactly moral though is it??

milo

some people might consider it antisocial or selfish, yes. and its not just to do with benefits...

if everyone had 3 kids, population grows by 50% every generation. this country is already overcrowded as it is.

Brendan Hughes

chuckster - you leave my wife alone

mark_h

Sterilise (non-permanently) everyone at birth and then put the reversing agent into child-proof medicine bottles - that should stop the chavs getting pregnant as they won't be able to work out how to open them

Senior_AP

Shouldn't get preggers in the first place. I'm sure if they knew they would not receive state funding they would be ALOT more careful in the first instant.

Senior_AP

Exactly. You don't have to be Einstein to work it out do you.

MattW

But bareback is much nicer

Tiggs

MORAL!!!!

how moral is it to bring a kid into a house where everyone is a retarded slapper, where they all smoke, where no one works, where the kid will be exposed to foul laungage, smoke, poor diet and taught nothing in terms of right or wrong.

how moral will that liitle **** grow up to be when he concludes, at the age of 10, its ok to nick cars cause uncle billy does it for a living, how moral will it be when at 15 he concludes, because all his retard mates do it, that its ok to **** any rough looking slapper he meets.....and so it goes on.

i think i have the moral high ground here!

J4CKO

iTrader: (1)

Depends on the parents really, we have 3 boys and apart from child benefit entirely financially self sufficient. I wanted 2 but the wife persuaded me into a third and I am glad I did.

Somebody has to breed I suppose and they cant all be Chavs, there are a lot of 'me' people on here, earn well and spend it all on themselves, dont want to share it with anyone (so it seems) or maybe its just easier to buy bits for cars and various gadgets than commit to having kids, cant say I blame them sometimes, having kids is so all or nothing, no half measures and believe me they ARE a pain in the **** sometimes, however I wouldnt change things and nowadays theres no more sh1tty nappies and they want cool stuff for Christmas, they do however trash the house and cost a fortune thus curtailing my car accesory and gadget purchases.

Britain needs the next generation, aging dinkys are no use so I suppose it is up to the Chavs to breed but by and large Chav offspring choose Chavdom as a career and provide a negative contribution to society.

Get Breeding, but only if you have money, no hereditary diseases, physical perfection, a high IQ and blonde hair......... Ooops, starting to sound like somebody there.

Jay m A

iTrader: (2)

I'm with Chuck, I'm convinced I've fathered the next British Wimbledon tennis champion - the government should pay me to stud - no mingers mind.