Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

is it possible to squash a standard fpr to run higher pressure?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 05:26 PM
  #1  
rentonone's Avatar
rentonone
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 2
From: West midlands
Default is it possible to squash a standard fpr to run higher pressure?

some one told me that it would be possible to raise the fuel pressure of a standard regulator by squashing it in a vice. is this true or not? thanks
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 06:48 PM
  #2  
360ste's Avatar
360ste
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,892
Likes: 0
From: In the Flatlands of Lincolnshire
Default

Not sure. I think the chances of it splitting and if not noticed spraying nice flamable fuel over the engine highly likely. Might not be a good idea???
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 07:28 PM
  #3  
justanotherperson's Avatar
justanotherperson
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rentonone
some one told me that it would be possible to raise the fuel pressure of a standard regulator by squashing it in a vice. is this true or not? thanks
you might up the pressure but you would also restrict the amount getting through
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 08:08 PM
  #4  
rentonone's Avatar
rentonone
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 2
From: West midlands
Default

what part of the regulator do you think they meant squash? the body of it or the part where the hose goes on?
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 10:24 PM
  #5  
Welloilbeefhooked's Avatar
Welloilbeefhooked
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,577
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

Ive read this in a Haynes Engine Management book. The flow is not restricted. It is the same theory as replacing the spring for one with more tension that simply ups the pressure. What pressure this is going to be is anyones guess.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 10:59 PM
  #6  
rentonone's Avatar
rentonone
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 2
From: West midlands
Default

how does the regulator actually work? could some explain, what does the vacume do on it? thanks
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 11:08 PM
  #7  
Welloilbeefhooked's Avatar
Welloilbeefhooked
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,577
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

The valve has a spring that allows the feul to run back to the tank when a predertermined pressure is reached, say 3bar. The vacuum further opens this valve when idling etc so as to lower pressure.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 11:23 PM
  #8  
rentonone's Avatar
rentonone
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 2
From: West midlands
Default

Originally Posted by Welloilbeefhooked
The valve has a spring that allows the feul to run back to the tank when a predertermined pressure is reached, say 3bar. The vacuum further opens this valve when idling etc so as to lower pressure.
thanks mate, i understand now.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 07:16 AM
  #9  
rentonone's Avatar
rentonone
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 2
From: West midlands
Default

does anyone know how reliable they are at keeping a good pressure when running more power. im going to be running about 1.3 bar boost thanks

Last edited by rentonone; Mar 14, 2006 at 07:20 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 08:26 AM
  #10  
Butty's Avatar
Butty
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 1
From: MY06 STi Spec D
Default

What power are you after and what injectors/ fuel pump do you want to run.
You may find that upping the pressure isn't needed.

Nick
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 09:30 AM
  #11  
RB5_245's Avatar
RB5_245
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Default

The line goes to the inlet manifold to control the pressure an whatever boost you're at.

If you're at 1.3 bar the fuel press is raised by 1.3 bar ie to 4.8 bar.

Squashing it is not a good idea I'd say they're weak enough already. And yes, it will restrict flow. Restricting flow is how it controls pressure in the first place!

Dave
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 09:35 AM
  #12  
Welloilbeefhooked's Avatar
Welloilbeefhooked
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,577
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

True on a Subaru, I forgot about it raising pressure under boost.

As for flow restriction, it should still flow the same amount, just at a higher pressure.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 09:39 AM
  #13  
RB5_245's Avatar
RB5_245
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Default

FPR is on the outlet of the fuel rail and is just a regulating valve. by shutting off the valve and hence reducing the flow to the tank return, the pressure rises.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 04:03 PM
  #14  
rentonone's Avatar
rentonone
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 2
From: West midlands
Default

Originally Posted by Butty
What power are you after and what injectors/ fuel pump do you want to run.
You may find that upping the pressure isn't needed.

Nick
its a my 00 so its got 440 injecters, ive got walbro pump,uprated turbo with supporting mods to get around 330bhp, its also got a parallel fuel rail mod using the standard regulater. do you think it will be ok?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 04:03 PM
  #15  
rentonone's Avatar
rentonone
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 2
From: West midlands
Default

thanks
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 04:08 PM
  #16  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

Get a decent uprated FPR such as an SX.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 04:14 PM
  #17  
rentonone's Avatar
rentonone
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 2
From: West midlands
Default

Originally Posted by BOB'5
Get a decent uprated FPR such as an SX.
if its definatly needed i will have to get one, im just skint at the mo and my remap is on the 24th. is any one else using a standard reg with this sort of power? thanks
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 04:20 PM
  #18  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

Being skint and aiming for those sort of figures may not be the best idea.

Things can break when your running over 100bhp more than when it left the factory.

Speak to your mapper if you need confirmation about the FPR.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 04:28 PM
  #19  
rentonone's Avatar
rentonone
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 2
From: West midlands
Default

Originally Posted by BOB'5
Being skint and aiming for those sort of figures may not be the best idea.

Things can break when your running over 100bhp more than when it left the factory.

Speak to your mapper if you need confirmation about the FPR.
yeah i know what your saying mate,its just a bad month. my car is all done now tho exept the regulator. thanks
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 08:04 AM
  #20  
RB5_245's Avatar
RB5_245
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Default

It won't last long, but it will last a bit. Change it next month, if you keep the fuel press the same it won't be a problem to put a new one on then.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:22 AM
  #21  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

Originally Posted by RB5_245
It won't last long, but it will last a bit. Change it next month, if you keep the fuel press the same it won't be a problem to put a new one on then.
Hey?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 12:16 PM
  #22  
RB5_245's Avatar
RB5_245
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BOB'5
Hey?


Hello?

Is my grammar that bad that that is unreadable..... quite possible!

Anyway just to add, it may also last the life of the car but I doubt it
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 12:38 PM
  #23  
Floyd's Avatar
Floyd
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,471
Likes: 10
Default

I use the std reg on my MY00 at 333bhp. Works just fine on Walbro. I have an SX but no time to fit it yet.

F
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 03:11 PM
  #24  
RB5_245's Avatar
RB5_245
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Default

My reg sat under my bed for months until the old one failed and I had to fit it, they go with quite a shocking pop!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 03:21 PM
  #25  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

RB5: Wasn't/isn't quite clear whether you're suggesting he run a 'squashed' FPR or run the std one until next month - hopefully the latter

I would rather postpone the mapping until everything is in place as you (presumably) wouldn't be able to realise the benefits of increasing the FP if mapped with OE FPR.

Floyd: Are you still on 440s?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 04:44 PM
  #26  
RB5_245's Avatar
RB5_245
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Default

I was suggesting the latter

he has 440's, which will be bine for 330bhp on stock fuel pressure

Originally Posted by rentonone
its a my 00 so its got 440 injecters, ive got walbro pump,uprated turbo with supporting mods to get around 330bhp, its also got a parallel fuel rail mod using the standard regulater. do you think it will be ok?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aaron_ions
General Technical
17
Nov 3, 2021 11:07 AM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
61
Jan 11, 2021 03:08 PM
Mister:E
ScoobyNet General
18
Sep 18, 2015 01:30 PM
aaron_ions
General Technical
1
Sep 17, 2015 10:42 AM
TypeR99
ScoobyNet General
0
Sep 13, 2015 01:25 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:33 PM.