WTF Where has my Thread Gone?
#3
Track Day Organiser
Thread Starter
Where was my thread Libellous?
Last edited by Phil; 01 September 2011 at 09:35 AM. Reason: Cause I couldn't spell and I am sure thats against the rules
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In RS land......
Posts: 12,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In RS land......
Posts: 12,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We are also aware that people are making repeated posts, amending signatures, locations etc to discredit this dealer.
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Going round in circles in a Mini
Posts: 5,485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No surprise that that last thread was deleted.
But I think the dealer concerned would have difficulty proving libel as by the definition
'The legal definition of libel is a published (including broadcast) false statement that: '
As we are aware of facts to support all of the comments made, therefore not libellous at all.
This really is just restrictions on freedom of speech and information.
But I think the dealer concerned would have difficulty proving libel as by the definition
'The legal definition of libel is a published (including broadcast) false statement that: '
As we are aware of facts to support all of the comments made, therefore not libellous at all.
This really is just restrictions on freedom of speech and information.
#12
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: There on the stair
Posts: 10,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sorry, but under UK law, the people making the statements have to prove what they are saying is true. Statements are assumed false until such time.
It may be possible for the person involved in the original issue to do so, but no proof has been forthcoming and others are jumping on the bandwagon and making clearly libellous statements.
As such, we have to act within the UK law and remove the posts. Further to that, such posts are in breach of the forum rules and we will act accordingly.
UK libel laws are pretty much the most restrictive in the world, but we must operate within them.
It may be possible for the person involved in the original issue to do so, but no proof has been forthcoming and others are jumping on the bandwagon and making clearly libellous statements.
As such, we have to act within the UK law and remove the posts. Further to that, such posts are in breach of the forum rules and we will act accordingly.
UK libel laws are pretty much the most restrictive in the world, but we must operate within them.
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Daily drive is a Scoob again - just what it should be!
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No surprise that that last thread was deleted.
But I think the dealer concerned would have difficulty proving libel as by the definition
'The legal definition of libel is a published (including broadcast) false statement that: '
As we are aware of facts to support all of the comments made, therefore not libellous at all.
This really is just restrictions on freedom of speech and information.
But I think the dealer concerned would have difficulty proving libel as by the definition
'The legal definition of libel is a published (including broadcast) false statement that: '
As we are aware of facts to support all of the comments made, therefore not libellous at all.
This really is just restrictions on freedom of speech and information.
Not often we agree Neil, but on this occassion we do!! Well put!
I would like to know why the Mods are so damn scared of this Trader.
At best I would say 99.9% of the posts have been unfavourable but certainly not Libellous! True & honest - whichis what I thought Scoobynet was about?
I thought this was a community that was for like minded people to discuss experiences & warn of potential pitfalls, helping each other out?
I have seen far worse on other forums without the heavy handedness of Monds weilding the finger over the DELETE button constantly....
Clearly there is more to this than meets the eye.......
#18
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: There on the stair
Posts: 10,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh Lord.
No there is no conspiracy. No there is not more to this than meets the eye. No, we are not scared of this trader
The linked thread shows that Court cases, trading standards et al are involved so it's a completely different set of circumstances
We are simply adhering to UK law, there is no more to this than that one simple fact
As stated above
No there is no conspiracy. No there is not more to this than meets the eye. No, we are not scared of this trader
The linked thread shows that Court cases, trading standards et al are involved so it's a completely different set of circumstances
We are simply adhering to UK law, there is no more to this than that one simple fact
As stated above
#21
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
He actually endorsed a car in a recent thread about Keighley
https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-...s-impreza.html
https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-...s-impreza.html
Last edited by 53; 01 September 2011 at 11:50 AM.
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jolly Mechanic
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He actually endorsed a car in a recent thread about Keighley
https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-...s-impreza.html
https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-...s-impreza.html