Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

Cam belt change, need for new idlers why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01 November 2005, 10:08 PM
  #1  
JIM THEO
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
JIM THEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Cam belt change, need for new idlers why?

Well, due to my connection with local Subaru dept I have informed that almost in all new age cars when you change cambelt you have to change except the tensioner and belt also all belt idlers as they are very delicates and have caused many engine failures in both WRX/STI's!
How can this be true and if yes why Subaru changed the classic shape relative parts with new ones (part codes) less reliable?
Recently an STI MY02 had problems due to failed belt idler (13073AA142 - factory idler not changed after cambelt change)!
Anyone with similar experience?
JIM
Old 02 November 2005, 11:01 AM
  #2  
APIDavid
Former Sponsor
Support Scoobynet!
Support Scoobynet!Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (4)
 
APIDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: @Junc 12, M40 Warwicksh; 01926 614522 CV33 9PL -Use 9GX for Satnav. South Mids Alcatek ECu dealer
Posts: 6,377
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Jim, In my view, this is Subaru propaganda to sell more parts. We fit a new belt every time we rebuild an engine, but we almost never change the idlers unless we can see an obvious problem.

After about 750 rebuilds since Jan 2001, we appear to have had a first
' unexplained ' cam belt failure last week after running OK for 2 years after the rebuild.

Mechanical mayhem of course and all 16 valves bent.

My suggestion is to check and examine rather than just replace *****-nilly. The argument of course is, that if you have a good one, considering that it is a suspect bit of kit according to them, you may take off a good one and replace it with a dodgy one.........

Same thing applies to 99 / 2000 MAF's change it every service because they are crap, is a comment I hear all to often, but if you've got a good-un you may just be worse off.

Good Luck David, APi Engines / APi Impreza
www.apiengines.com
Old 02 November 2005, 11:31 AM
  #3  
chris_c201
Scooby Regular
 
chris_c201's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

David,

If you were changing a cambelt on a 2001 bugeye with 23k miles would you change the tensioners ??

Cheers
Chris.

Originally Posted by APIDavid
Jim, In my view, this is Subaru propaganda to sell more parts. We fit a new belt every time we rebuild an engine, but we almost never change the idlers unless we can see an obvious problem.

After about 750 rebuilds since Jan 2001, we appear to have had a first
' unexplained ' cam belt failure last week after running OK for 2 years after the rebuild.

Mechanical mayhem of course and all 16 valves bent.

My suggestion is to check and examine rather than just replace *****-nilly. The argument of course is, that if you have a good one, considering that it is a suspect bit of kit according to them, you may take off a good one and replace it with a dodgy one.........

Same thing applies to 99 / 2000 MAF's change it every service because they are crap, is a comment I hear all to often, but if you've got a good-un you may just be worse off.

Good Luck David, APi Engines / APi Impreza
www.apiengines.com
Old 02 November 2005, 11:46 AM
  #4  
APIDavid
Former Sponsor
Support Scoobynet!
Support Scoobynet!Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (4)
 
APIDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: @Junc 12, M40 Warwicksh; 01926 614522 CV33 9PL -Use 9GX for Satnav. South Mids Alcatek ECu dealer
Posts: 6,377
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Chris, we would use our judgment after we've examined them. The easy way out [ read expensive ] is to change all. The engineers way is to exercise judgment.

It isn't as simple as would you or would you not.

Kind regards David APi Engines / APi Impreza
www.apiengines.com
Old 02 November 2005, 01:33 PM
  #5  
JIM THEO
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
JIM THEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks David, I thought the same but the above car with failed cambelt had problematic the one idler, obviously they should have had replace it during cambelt change!
JIM
Old 05 November 2005, 02:12 PM
  #6  
sssssteeeee
Scooby Regular
 
sssssteeeee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A J MOTORS birmingham did mine on turbo 2000 pretensioner had snapped and idle bearing had jammed they put new belt in and pretensioner/idle valve £500 all in..... car seems ok 3 weeks later,as it was b 4 problems.
Old 05 November 2005, 03:08 PM
  #7  
FB Tuning
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (30)
 
FB Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: FB Tuning Workshop - HP27
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sounds like they 'pulled your pants down' if all they did was fit a new belt and tensioner for £500
Old 05 November 2005, 08:30 PM
  #8  
tweenierob
Scooby Regular
 
tweenierob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fcon Power Writer
Posts: 4,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Give me a shout if it happens again, only £450

Rob
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
IAN WR1
ScoobyNet General
8
28 September 2015 08:14 PM
shorty87
Other Marques
0
25 September 2015 08:52 PM



Quick Reply: Cam belt change, need for new idlers why?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:30 AM.