Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

2.1 Stroker for a JDM/Spec C

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 07:29 PM
  #1  
-Nic-'s Avatar
-Nic-
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge
Default 2.1 Stroker for a JDM/Spec C

Hey...

Has anyone fitted a 2.1 stroker to a JDM/Spec C running a Litchfield turbo?

What would be the advantages of a 2.1 over a 2.0 running say an LM400?

Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 07:52 PM
  #2  
wrx9181's Avatar
wrx9181
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,160
Likes: 3
From: South Yorkshire
Default

Hi mate
From what I have seen on different turbos.
2.1 stroker adds torque strength lower spool up on turbo so more drivable on the road.
I have sc46 and I'm after a 2.1 next year
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 08:29 PM
  #3  
Toffee's Avatar
Toffee
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Default

I have the LM420 on my Spec C, if I was to get a 2.1 stroker conversion I would look at changing the turbo as well to something like the MD321V because I think he 2.1 with the extra torque can utilise the potential of the V where as I think it would very laggy on the 2.0L?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 09:37 PM
  #4  
rickya's Avatar
rickya
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,322
Likes: 1
From: Herts/Middx
Default

Im not sure I would want to go from a Litchfields LM420 turbo, which is the latest development of twin scroll turbo engineering, to just another MD321V. I dont think its a step forwards & would detract from the essence of a twin scrolled Spec C. But thats just my thoughts, call me a JDM purist! lol

Last edited by rickya; Dec 5, 2010 at 09:39 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 09:53 PM
  #5  
juggers's Avatar
juggers
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by rickya
Im not sure I would want to go from a Litchfields LM420 turbo, which is the latest development of twin scroll turbo engineering, to just another MD321V. I dont think its a step forwards & would detract from the essence of a twin scrolled Spec C. But thats just my thoughts, call me a JDM purist! lol
Yeh I agree the new LM turbos have only just been developed and already have new bits to add on.

What I don't understand is why you are asking about a 2.1 you only just got the car and I doubt you've managed 1500 miles in her and your already thinking of a 2.1
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 09:58 PM
  #6  
-Nic-'s Avatar
-Nic-
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge
Default

Just asking No harm in that So far it's covered 2670 trouble free miles

Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 09:59 PM
  #7  
Toffee's Avatar
Toffee
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickya
Im not sure I would want to go from a Litchfields LM420 turbo, which is the latest development of twin scroll turbo engineering, to just another MD321V. I dont think its a step forwards & would detract from the essence of a twin scrolled Spec C. But thats just my thoughts, call me a JDM purist! lol
Funnily enough Richard Bulmer agrees with you, but I am falling in to the trap of wanting alot more which is why I have considered a 2.1 well happy with the LM420 for now
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 10:08 PM
  #8  
rickya's Avatar
rickya
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,322
Likes: 1
From: Herts/Middx
Default

Originally Posted by 555EFC
Funnily enough Richard Bulmer agrees with you, but I am falling in to the trap of wanting alot more which is why I have considered a 2.1 well happy with the LM420 for now
You have a great car as is, i would just drive it & enjoy it, ...you lucky git!!
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 10:34 PM
  #9  
juggers's Avatar
juggers
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 3
Default

I will be planting an LM400 on zee R205 muhahah (evil laugh)
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 10:37 PM
  #10  
Toffee's Avatar
Toffee
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickya
You have a great car as is, i would just drive it & enjoy it, ...you lucky git!!

Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 10:55 PM
  #11  
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 24
From: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Default

Originally Posted by -Nic-
Hey...

Has anyone fitted a 2.1 stroker to a JDM/Spec C running a Litchfield turbo?

What would be the advantages of a 2.1 over a 2.0 running say an LM400?

Potentially more torque and quicker spool. Not worth the expense unless you are intending in going for a much bigger turbo imo. Then the wallet busting comes in to effect..... I would question for what reason though.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 12:24 AM
  #12  
Guv's Avatar
Guv
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 0
From: Middlesex
Default

Originally Posted by juggers
I will be planting an LM400 on zee R205 muhahah (evil laugh)
I think I just wet myself
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 06:15 PM
  #13  
Toffee's Avatar
Toffee
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Default

Been thinking about this one again recently, on a twin scroll car with a 2.1L stroker kit fitted what would be the ideal turbo I was just thinking if the 2.1L provides the extra torque in comparrison to the 2.0L would the twin scroll LM500 be an ideal candidate or is this going slightly too large (when aiming a strong bottom end pulling from low down)

I know there is also the LM450 & the LM470 as well. I believe since this thread start way back that the LM500 is now available in billet form?

Anyone on any thoughts on the ideal turbo for a JDM 2.1L?

Lee.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 06:37 PM
  #14  
-Nic-'s Avatar
-Nic-
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge
Default

2.35L with an LM500
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 06:46 PM
  #15  
Toffee's Avatar
Toffee
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by -Nic-
2.35L with an LM500

£££££££££££ would love to but it would appear to be big bucks, I/we are lucky to have the 06 Spec C, I think these engines stroked are hugely capable of making good numbers without needing the expense of going 2.35. I am guessing the twin scroll set up may make up for the missing 200cc's?

I am also guessing that an LM500 may be good for 520/530hp? my present set up really is awesome, but after entering TA in April its left me feeling just a tad more hp and I will be quick enough to chase the lads at the front, another 80hp and a lot more torque would help alot and still be great on the road I reckon
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 06:57 PM
  #16  
-Nic-'s Avatar
-Nic-
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge
Default

Yep the 2.35 isn't the cheap option. I agree that you should get good numbers from a stroker kit which would cost alot less than a built 2.35.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Billet
ScoobyNet General
42
Oct 14, 2015 10:38 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
Oct 2, 2015 09:22 AM
techdw
ScoobyNet General
12
Sep 28, 2015 07:09 AM
The Fixer
Drivetrain
155
Oct 1, 2003 11:03 AM
moses
Scotland
49
May 4, 2003 10:58 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:12 PM.