Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

Stroker kits & Closed Deck blocks?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13 September 2003, 04:09 PM
  #1  
The Fixer
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
The Fixer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Calling all of you out there who are running MORE than the original 2 litres, who's stroker kits & closed deck block options have you used to gain success in the big power stakes?

I have seen various options on the market from MRT & TRP in Australia...anybody care to point me in the right direction.

Old 13 September 2003, 05:18 PM
  #2  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

I'm afraid I don't know of any that have had "success in the big power stakes" combined with the level of reliability you'd expect from a road car. There are many builds/rebuilds in progress but there appear to be many potential pitfalls along the way.

The 2.0 seems reliable at circa 450bhp and there are a number of cars with decent mileage on them now at this level.

Andy
Old 14 September 2003, 11:16 AM
  #3  
The Fixer
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
The Fixer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Cheers Andy, think I'll hang fire for a while to see if these cars in the rebuild stage prove to be reliable.
Old 14 September 2003, 11:37 AM
  #4  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

thought you were coming to see me?? (I also have more than 2 litres)

David
Old 14 September 2003, 12:04 PM
  #5  
The Fixer
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
The Fixer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

David, must admit, I did forget to ring you re: visit. Will have to leave it for the time being as I'm going to put the turbo in the original position. I have discovered that using the APS turbo outlet (90 deg) my required downpipe would probably foul the gear box and that I would have to get modified intercooler pipework also. At the moment I just want to get the car on the road with the new bits, install planned for next week, Fuel pump, Regulator, FMIC, Turbo, Dumpvalve, Full 3" system and ECU (to get rid of the MAF) and enjoy it for a while etc etc. Probably move the turbo when I go down the road of more displacement....

Tell me more about your "more than 2 litres", email me if its secret. lol
Old 14 September 2003, 02:52 PM
  #6  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thumbs up

Read Here http://www.scoobynet.co.uk/bbs/threa...hreadid=181119
Old 15 September 2003, 09:46 AM
  #7  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

Well my garret's downpipe clears my gearbox
Old 15 September 2003, 10:28 AM
  #8  
Adam M
Scooby Regular
 
Adam M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 7,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

So does mine.

I wonder if yours is similar to mine david!
Old 15 September 2003, 11:51 AM
  #9  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wink

Adam

This thread is addressed to those "who are running MORE than the original 2 litres" My engine has probably worn out past 2 litres what's your excuse
Old 15 September 2003, 12:12 PM
  #10  
Adam M
Scooby Regular
 
Adam M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 7,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

standard 22b is 2.2!
Old 15 September 2003, 12:29 PM
  #11  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

And your std Sti engine is ????
Old 15 September 2003, 12:37 PM
  #12  
The Fixer
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
The Fixer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

David, Adam, my problem is that I am running the APS 90deg high flow turbo outlet elbow and I am not sure where the exit from this will be. After this week when the FMIC is fitted,exhaust system is on and MAF has been scrapped I will have more room in that area to asses connection points of revised uppipe and downpipe to move the turbo where I want it.
Old 15 September 2003, 02:23 PM
  #13  
Adam M
Scooby Regular
 
Adam M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 7,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

andy, where does it say CURRENTLY running?

are there times when you ever are not looking to take the p?

because I was simply asking if davids downpipe was a copy of mine, not trying to get in on the high power action which I know you have the monopoly on.
Old 15 September 2003, 02:25 PM
  #14  
P20SPD
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
 
P20SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Doubt its a copy Adam, similar no doubt due to position etc, but Paul made it from scratch!
Old 15 September 2003, 03:15 PM
  #15  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wink

lol @ Adam I'm also running a 2.5L scoob and it has 726bhp ........just not currently
Old 15 September 2003, 03:49 PM
  #16  
Adam M
Scooby Regular
 
Adam M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 7,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

dyno print out andy?

oh you can't provide one because its a lie rather than a set back?

you don't have to be smug all the time you know, I just hope one day you arent unfortunate enough to have an engine failure beyind your control whilst testing the limits of what has been done before.

Personally I think the respect you have earned is due to your providing alternative solutions which are often cheaper, combined with clearly a lot of knowledge.

The big headedness really detracts from that.

Forgive me for jumping off the handle, but I am just not in the mood for it today, and reading what you are writing for once doesn't come across as light hearted banter - more look at me and my achievements and bow.

the details of where you are from just highlight this, just in case new people weren't aware.

You are worthy of admiration as far as I am concerned, but a truly great person is modest in my opinion, and that is something which you are not.




Old 15 September 2003, 04:34 PM
  #17  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Smile

Oh Adam, you've still got those Monday morning blues. It's a bank holiday up here, hence my merry state of mind (oops, is that me being smug again)

Of course I don't have a dyno print out, it was said in jest. I'm sure others read it as such rather than assuming I had blatantly lied

Perhaps you misunderstood me, I didn't intend to have a 'pop' at your engine failure, sorry if it came across that way.

I have never claimed to be, nor do I aim to be, a "truly great person" far from it, I'm just an average guy playing with cars in my spare time

Andy
Old 15 September 2003, 04:55 PM
  #18  
Adam M
Scooby Regular
 
Adam M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 7,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

am not saying you are a great person, only that in terms of tuning you have achieved great things. I have learned plenty from you, and you were always nice enough to teach me without being smug.

Its just the cutting little comments when they arent necessary such as the above.

You are right again, monday blues, but it would be nice for once if you could add something which isn't a dig at me.
Old 15 September 2003, 06:16 PM
  #19  
M0NEY
Scooby Regular
 
M0NEY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: RIP Moneys Scoob 440bhp/470lbsft 31-07-08
Posts: 6,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Cheer up guys

Only 4 days left to the weekend
Old 15 September 2003, 08:23 PM
  #20  
MAD-MATT
Scooby Regular
 
MAD-MATT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

I have a 2.2 stroke conversion and i am very pleased with the result,the low down torque is awsome,my car made 343lb with a standard Td05 at 1.4 bar,lol....
Old 15 September 2003, 09:05 PM
  #21  
The Fixer
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
The Fixer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Adam Chill, Andy Chill, This one will end up as sour as the thread "at Harvey's request" lol

Like the pun though Andy....(POP)

Perhaps you misunderstood me, I didn't intend to have a 'pop' at your engine failure, sorry if it came across that way.
Adam, no offence m8y.

Just looking for a reliable stroker kit....

AndyF origin of your kit?

Adam, care to share your supplier?

JB are you out there? You have 2.33 also I believe????

DW, is yours from TRP or is it secret??? OOps Did I say too much




Edited because I've been up since 4 and can no longer spell or type


[Edited by RSVR Racer - 9/15/2003 9:06:52 PM]

[Edited by RSVR Racer - 9/15/2003 9:08:08 PM]
Old 15 September 2003, 10:26 PM
  #22  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Smile

I don't have a stroker kit, it's a std internals 2.0
There are a number of 2.0 cars with circa 450 bhp and just under 400lb-ft torque which have done over 20k miles, have seen a bit of track action and they are all still running strong.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not claiming all strokers are unreliable. Just that they are currently unproven at decent BHP levels in the UK.
I'm sure they are reliable at lower output but what's the point of that ?
I hope that they do prove reliable as the 2.3/2.5 has produced some excellent dyno outputs.

Andy
Old 15 September 2003, 10:33 PM
  #23  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

its all in the thread.. mail me and ill let you know

or come and see it..

Adam.. Shut up.. and grab the tampax..

Andy you make me chuckle

Its like 22b on here

Cant remember what I was saying..

back later..

David
Old 15 September 2003, 10:35 PM
  #24  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

Back again..

Mad-Matt...

Erm..

Myself and andy have both done more on std 2litre engines with std td05's

You need to map it better

I had 345bhp at 6200 and 342lbft at 4000..

STD Engine STD turbo..

I also used petrol.. Im as to what fuel andy was running but Id guess its probably similar to the contents of my stomach around 3:00am any friday night

David
Old 15 September 2003, 10:49 PM
  #25  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

C8H18 probably
Old 16 September 2003, 06:43 AM
  #26  
roodog
Scooby Regular
 
roodog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

call me a little slow, but when you talk of hp is that @ the wheels or flywheel, whats the conversion from f/lbs to newton metres, us aussies only use metric..
Old 16 September 2003, 10:03 AM
  #27  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

according to onlineconversion.com or something...

342 foot pound-force = 463.6897396 newton meter
Old 16 September 2003, 10:27 AM
  #28  
The Fixer
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
The Fixer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

David LOL @

Im unsure as to what fuel andy was running but Id guess its probably similar to the contents of my stomach around 3:00am any friday night
Any scoobies out there running on kebabs????

Or even Alcohol for that matter...now theres an idea????





[Edited by RSVR Racer - 9/16/2003 10:30:59 AM]

[Edited by RSVR Racer - 9/16/2003 10:32:16 AM]
Old 16 September 2003, 10:31 AM
  #29  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post



Chilli Sauce? Salad?

David
Old 16 September 2003, 10:59 AM
  #30  
P20SPD
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
 
P20SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Andy
There are a number of 2.0 cars with circa 450 bhp and just under 400lb-ft torque which have done over 20k miles, have seen a bit of track action and they are all still running strong
Sorry about this Andy, i am getting a little confused when you type the above. You see, this is my next dilema with my car, stay 2.0l or go bigger, either way it must be reliable, as it will be used day in day out to tune of 5-600 miles a week.

I can probably think of the cars you are covering in your statement, but to my knowledge i am a little uncertain about the mileage claims, ie reliability.

This is not intended as a dig or to start any arguments, just to clarify something thats been bugging me for a while, as the ultimate answer could decide which route i go, if any!

Off the top of my head my summary of the cars i think you mean.

Harvey:- Been running 400+ together with late 300 torque figures for a good while, nearly a year i think since he cracked 417 at well lane. I understand that Harvey does quite a bit of mileage in his car, but would be grateful if he could clarify what mileage he HAS covered since October last year. Only one mishap to my knowledge, pre TOTB2. Harvey also does quite a lot of RR events, Drag shootouts and Trackdays.

John Banks:- Toitering on the 400 limit in his 2.0l stage, but i did not think he used it as a daily driver, merely as a toy? Again i would be grateful if John could clarify is mileage and BHP from a year ago and todate. We all know that Johns mapping abilities and monitoring were constant whilst running at this level, or so i believe. Dont think John has done many Track Days with his car at that level. Again could you clarify.

Andy F:- Again 400+ for a while, certainly since January of this year. Credited is due to you, as a lot of your work is done David Wallis style, which is very impressive. Again i would appreciate if you could clarify what mileage you have ACTUALLY covered over the last year, as i seem to remember you once saying less than 5000 miles a year. I am aware that you do quite a few drag days, etc, but again it would be helpful to know how many at the state of tune you refer to. You have also had your engine apart in the last year, cant remember why, but i think you changed the pistons or something, and you have been through several gearboxes, which is .

Bob Rawle:- Not too sure on bob, dont know how many miles he covers or has covered at the 400 mark, or how many track days etc he has attended whilst at this level!


So in summary, i personally would be very grateful if you, Harvey, John, Bob, etc could provide a summary of mileage, track days, etc over the last year, as that will/may help me decide what i want to do.

My car over the last year covered approx 22000 miles, been on 2 rolling road days, attended 2 drag top speed days with approx 25 runs in total, attended TOTB2 with 8/9 runs and handling circuit runs of 7 or 8 including John Felsteads attempts. It has been off the road in the last year twice, once in december when i realised the tracking was out and the front tyres were dead, 1 week waiting for replacements, and then 4 weeks over June July, after the gearbox went, but thats it. On the 2 rolling road days it produced 338bhp & 313lbft and 343bhp and 325lbft respectively, and i feel it has been running a little more of late due to the headers.

As i posted after TOTB2, where next? This still applies! all this talk of reliabilty at any engine size puts doubt in my mind, especially as the only one i can truly think of is Harvey that does the mileage, which by all accounts proves the reliabilty, but he is running an STi engine.

Even more confused now

Any thoughts or comments ?

Steven


Quick Reply: Stroker kits & Closed Deck blocks?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:40 AM.