SC42 or SC46 on a 2.1
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SC42 or SC46 on a 2.1
Hi All,
I have seen the thread with a lot of info on the SC range, but from what I gather now, the SC guys are not on this forum now.
What SC turbo would be suited on a 2.1 Stroker aiming for about 440bhp - 450bhp?
SC42 or the SC46? I am guessing the SC42 will give me less lag, 46 more lag but more power in general?
Its a newage 2003 STi so I have AVCS.
Thanks
I have seen the thread with a lot of info on the SC range, but from what I gather now, the SC guys are not on this forum now.
What SC turbo would be suited on a 2.1 Stroker aiming for about 440bhp - 450bhp?
SC42 or the SC46? I am guessing the SC42 will give me less lag, 46 more lag but more power in general?
Its a newage 2003 STi so I have AVCS.
Thanks
Last edited by techdw; 27 September 2015 at 02:41 PM.
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
Hi All,
I have seen the thread with a lot of info on the SC range, but from what I gather now, the SC guys are not on this forum now.
What SC turbo would be suited on a 2.1 Stroker aiming for about 440bhp - 450bhp?
SC42 or the SC46? I am guessing the SC42 will give me less lag, 46 more lag but more power in general?
Its a newage 2003 STi so I have AVCS.
Thanks
I have seen the thread with a lot of info on the SC range, but from what I gather now, the SC guys are not on this forum now.
What SC turbo would be suited on a 2.1 Stroker aiming for about 440bhp - 450bhp?
SC42 or the SC46? I am guessing the SC42 will give me less lag, 46 more lag but more power in general?
Its a newage 2003 STi so I have AVCS.
Thanks
#5
Scooby Regular
Big sc turbo at low boost = good hp low LBFT
Small sc turbo at high boost = low hp good lbft
I wanted to run a huge SC turbo at moderate boost levels (400 bhp/340 lbft etc) on my WRX to protect the rods and gearbox from torque but the Clinic guys have told me going past 350bhp will still destroy the piston rings.
Small sc turbo at high boost = low hp good lbft
I wanted to run a huge SC turbo at moderate boost levels (400 bhp/340 lbft etc) on my WRX to protect the rods and gearbox from torque but the Clinic guys have told me going past 350bhp will still destroy the piston rings.
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
Big sc turbo at low boost = good hp low LBFT
Small sc turbo at high boost = low hp good lbft
I wanted to run a huge SC turbo at moderate boost levels (400 bhp/340 lbft etc) on my WRX to protect the rods and gearbox from torque but the Clinic guys have told me going past 350bhp will still destroy the piston rings.
Small sc turbo at high boost = low hp good lbft
I wanted to run a huge SC turbo at moderate boost levels (400 bhp/340 lbft etc) on my WRX to protect the rods and gearbox from torque but the Clinic guys have told me going past 350bhp will still destroy the piston rings.
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Regular
#12
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Im not running a 2.1 but am running a SC42 twin scroll on my 2.0 classic.
Not had it on a dyno yet but it's very impressive,it spools quite late(I should be able to tweak the map to get it working a little earlier),I'm hitting 1bar at 4300rpm and once the party has started its very fast to hit 1.6bar full boost at 5300rpm and holds it all the way to redline. Car pulls extreamly well indeed.
Not had it on a dyno yet but it's very impressive,it spools quite late(I should be able to tweak the map to get it working a little earlier),I'm hitting 1bar at 4300rpm and once the party has started its very fast to hit 1.6bar full boost at 5300rpm and holds it all the way to redline. Car pulls extreamly well indeed.
#13
Scooby Senior
ring ScoobyClinic?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post