Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

2.1 or 2.5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09 October 2010, 11:32 PM
  #91  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

I know I'm demanding but you dont have a boost graph for that aswell do you martyn Please
Old 09 October 2010, 11:58 PM
  #92  
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
stevebt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Daz I just looked at your new graph as compared to my very old one and yours spools slower than mine, is that the .82 housing? or is it the heads and cams??
Old 10 October 2010, 12:44 AM
  #93  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

I'm on full boost at around 3600rpm on the road, where was your old one spooling?
Old 10 October 2010, 01:03 AM
  #94  
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
MartynJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Posts: 2,629
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dazdavies
I know I'm demanding but you dont have a boost graph for that aswell do you martyn Please

Lol, anything else ?

Old 10 October 2010, 01:23 AM
  #95  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

LOL Thanks very much Martyn.

Spools up a little later than mine. I just love the driveability of mine and I dont want to lose the response it has. So it's good to see what difference cams make and where spool up changes.

Cheers for the info
Old 13 October 2010, 05:32 AM
  #96  
chrisdicko
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (21)
 
chrisdicko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Whitby, North Yorkshire
Posts: 3,016
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

May be a stupid question, but if you had for example a GT35R, one with .63 housing and one with .82 housing.....what difference does the housings make?
Old 13 October 2010, 06:15 AM
  #97  
SMA01 - black scoob
Scooby Regular
 
SMA01 - black scoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
Bollocks.
agree with that, what bollocks....
Old 13 October 2010, 01:32 PM
  #98  
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
dunx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chrisdicko
May be a stupid question, but if you had for example a GT35R, one with .63 housing and one with .82 housing.....what difference does the housings make?
Hi Chris,

mine is a GT3076 hybrid, with a 0.82 housing it was a 550 bhp turbo suitable for a 2.5.

On mine it spooled at 5800 rpm...

Now have a 0.62 housing on thanks to Andy @ AET-Turbos and it spools at 4000 rpm now.

So a large A/R ratio is good for a large displacement motor, a smaller housing is better for a small displacement motor. BUT the smaller housing will restrict the maximum flow ( = power ) at the top end.

All IMHO.

dunx
Old 13 October 2010, 03:21 PM
  #99  
rossi_p
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (26)
 
rossi_p's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,883
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jdc1
Its sounding like the 2.1 at the moment then but i would like to hear from people who have the 2.35
I have a 2.35 using a ej22t cdb and forged internals. Heads have Supertech valves & retainers, bronze valve guide and Prodrive rally cams. Lots of other supporting mods too but the turbo is a AFP MD32T1T. This is all in a V4 STi Type R.

Drives relatively lag free, but then I have rotated the inlet and shortened the FMIC pipe-work. Not sure how much difference this actually makes but I have it done mainly for aesthetic reason.

No idea on actual power but estimated in the region of 450/450 with the turbo running out of blow. T is a big limiting factor with the heads and bottom end capable of so much more. The good news is that I can do a turbo change to a V or maybe go rotated and should easily cope.

However, I have no plans to do this at the moment as she is a beastie on the road... maybe I’m just not man enough....
Old 13 October 2010, 05:34 PM
  #100  
JdcTypeR
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
JdcTypeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: In my car
Posts: 1,412
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rossi_p
I have a 2.35 using a ej22t cdb and forged internals. Heads have Supertech valves & retainers, bronze valve guide and Prodrive rally cams. Lots of other supporting mods too but the turbo is a AFP MD32T1T. This is all in a V4 STi Type R.

Drives relatively lag free, but then I have rotated the inlet and shortened the FMIC pipe-work. Not sure how much difference this actually makes but I have it done mainly for aesthetic reason.

No idea on actual power but estimated in the region of 450/450 with the turbo running out of blow. T is a big limiting factor with the heads and bottom end capable of so much more. The good news is that I can do a turbo change to a V or maybe go rotated and should easily cope.

However, I have no plans to do this at the moment as she is a beastie on the road... maybe I’m just not man enough....
Thanks for the input, i think that sort of power would be plenty for me!
Would standard sti v4 heads that i have on my original engine be capable of that power?
Old 13 October 2010, 05:49 PM
  #101  
Toffee
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Toffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 813
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Great thread, very interesting reading
Old 13 October 2010, 05:51 PM
  #102  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by jdc1
Thanks for the input, i think that sort of power would be plenty for me!
Would standard sti v4 heads that i have on my original engine be capable of that power?
There is a 2.2 cdb for sale in the for sale section

Tony
Old 13 October 2010, 05:56 PM
  #103  
JdcTypeR
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
JdcTypeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: In my car
Posts: 1,412
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know Tony but still waiting on the outcome of a claim so my hands are tied at the moment so just trying to get some ideas together.
Thanks for the heads up though
Cheers,
James.
Old 13 October 2010, 08:34 PM
  #104  
rossi_p
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (26)
 
rossi_p's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,883
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jdc1
Thanks for the input, i think that sort of power would be plenty for me!
Would standard sti v4 heads that i have on my original engine be capable of that power?
v4 STi heads, cams, valves etc are all well capable at 450+. To be honest, I'm not really making use of them running just the T. But I took the old 'whilst they're off' approach with the potential to just upgrade the turbo later on.
Old 13 October 2010, 10:15 PM
  #105  
chrisdicko
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (21)
 
chrisdicko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Whitby, North Yorkshire
Posts: 3,016
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dunx
Hi Chris,

mine is a GT3076 hybrid, with a 0.82 housing it was a 550 bhp turbo suitable for a 2.5.

On mine it spooled at 5800 rpm...

Now have a 0.62 housing on thanks to Andy @ AET-Turbos and it spools at 4000 rpm now.

So a large A/R ratio is good for a large displacement motor, a smaller housing is better for a small displacement motor. BUT the smaller housing will restrict the maximum flow ( = power ) at the top end.

All IMHO.

dunx
Nice one, thanks for that.

So maybe for a 2.1 a 0.62 housing would be better suited?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tarling
Subaru Parts
10
19 October 2015 07:58 PM
Billet
ScoobyNet General
42
14 October 2015 10:38 PM
sedge69
Wanted
0
01 October 2015 09:44 PM
IanG1983
Subaru Parts
1
30 September 2015 04:52 PM
techdw
ScoobyNet General
12
28 September 2015 07:09 AM



Quick Reply: 2.1 or 2.5



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:29 AM.