sorry on ur sc40

 

I will definitely be ordering an sc42. Unfortunately it won't be for a few months yet though, got a house to finish first

 

Looks awesome as always Kev!

 

WOW ...Fantastic result Kev,cant wait to see how the other two perform now.

 

Kev, when do you reckon you'll get round to testing the new SC42 (and 46?) B/TS's (with the latest genuine TS housing and volutes etc.)? And on a 2.0L without AVCS?

 

I got the offer of syvecs ecu at the right money recently and also a fantastic offer i couldnt refuse from Kev at the scoobyclinic to fit and map the new ecu in my car,i thought it was awesome before but now its just out of this world,many thanks to Kev and the team for the oustanding service i have recieved everytime i have been to see them.

Syvecs ecu,SC42 billet,V-power and 20% meth mix @ 1.85bar.

[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]

 

Jesus H Christ!

For a turbo designed for 420 ponies, it is epic!

Congrats on the power

I'm sure JGM has just fainted lol

 

hi kev fitting one of ur sc40 s fitted gt specs up pipe now how do i get the oil return pipe on? what a pain

also how safe is it to run dv less?

 

Oil return should have a short rubber pipe going on the oil return from the turbo and this gives you a degree of flexibility.

 

As Harvey said it has a small rubber pipe and I usually have it on the turbo before fitment and then slip it down the block return pipe as I fit the turbo as it can be a real pain to get it between the 2 ends when the turbo is in place.

 

WhiteWagonMan,
Forgive my ignorance, but looking back at your previous run they appear to be virtually the same as your current one with a top goon ECU..... unless your Syvecs was free that is.

What ECU were you using before?

Regardless, the graphs look nice.

 

Yea got the short Lil hose on and got turbo sitting right on top of hose but can't get it on?
So prodriverule u think might be Easyier on turbo 1st then on to block?

 

Shaun, that's what I thought, too.

But perhaps Glenn means that the Syvecs makes the car more driveable/smoother, etc.? And perhaps he has more torque over more of the rev range? (can't be bothered to hunt the old graph out).

I think he was on Simtek before(?) - does the Syvecs have greater resolution and/or better boost control?

 

Yes mate as you can push it down with a long screw driver from the top side[nice unsharp end one]
Much harder to pull up imo.

 

Hi,

take a look at the boost trace and you will see how superior the boost control is, and the AFR trace.

Cheers
Kev

 

Hi,

would you like an overlay Shaun, you will see the difference then.

Cheers
Kev

 

kev it safe to run dv less on ur sc40 ?

 

Hi,

not recommended, the SC42 upwards are fine though.

Cheers
Kev

 

Oh really ahhh really didn't wanna use my hks again . How bad will it affect it ? It's w.e car

 

Sorry sonic, I told you wrong then.

But it was based on what I had gleaned on this forum.

So apologies, and just disregard my post then.

 

Hi,

to be fair Joz you are both wrong and right, if Sonic wants to run dump valve less he can but it will shorten the life of the turbo and its main shaft is at risk, unlike the larger shaft used in the SC42 up wards.

As a weekend car it will probably be fine, its a risk that only the owner can take, I run DV less but mines an SC54 and its had plenty of use with no issue, quite how the SC40 Billet will fair I don't know.

Cheers
Kev

 

Got it Kev - the bit in bold explains it!


Yeah, I run a VTA DV simply because I can't be arsed to faff about and fashion a return for a recirc DV (car has a FMIC so a recirc DV would not be cited in the OEM position).

So am 'happy' to put up with, ahem, "undesirable #whoosh# noises" , if it means I get extended reliability/life from the 20g.

 

That peak boost is amazingly plateau'd, i.e. stable, from full boost to redline!

 

The other graph was done in 3rd and this latest one was 4th.... so yeah, I would expect differences in the shape, although I suspect the actual end result would of been nigh on the same (curve wise) had it been the same gear.

 

Are these not as strong as td series turbo s ? Don't really wanna chance the risk really suppose it the hks then .

 

Hi Shaun,

Agreed the graphs are very close power/torque wise at the top but i did gain 20bhp and 20ftlbs at 4500rpm with less boost so that can only be a plus factor,the car was ballistic before and is even more so now.

The simtek i had in my car before did not control the center diff in my 6 speed dccd box but the syvecs does,this has made a world of difference to the driveability as the ecu now controls the diff on the fly making the car so smooth to drive in any sittuation,the car is no longer *** end happy and does not try to kill me as it did before.

No the syvecs wasnt free but the sale of the simtek almost paid for it,and with the deal i got from Kev and the clinic team i would have been a fool to refuse,obviousley i was right to accept as the results speak for themselves.

Glad you like the graph.

Glenn.

 

Hi,

the MD series starts with Marks version of our SC42 Billet, so yes they are as strong.

The SC40 is a sleeve bearing 20 G Billet which uses a Mitsubishi core rather than the Garrett used in our SC42 upwards and the MD range.

Cheers
Kev

 

hmm people seem to run 20gs with dv less with no probs? ok sweet cheers kev

 

hi kev, has any body ran an sc54 on a 2.5, and if so what were the results like? cheers

 

Quick question, probably been covered but what is the maximum limit on the SC42 billet?