60mph to zero in 2.63 sec. !!!
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Land without a governement...LOL
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just finished testing my new setup.
Pagid RS 421 pads and Prodrive discs (on MY00 4pots).
We used a GPS datalogger and did 10 tests from 60-0.
1. 3.28
2. 2.76
3. 2.75
4. 2.66
4. 2.63
6. 2.69
7. 2.80
8. 2.71
9. 2.74
10. 2.69
The logger gave a "blip" when hitting 60 so the only variable is my right foot.
How can I translate this in braking power ?
Is there a formula for it or something to compare with ?
Creepy
PS : the first time is slower because the brakes where a little on the cold side !
Pagid RS 421 pads and Prodrive discs (on MY00 4pots).
We used a GPS datalogger and did 10 tests from 60-0.
1. 3.28
2. 2.76
3. 2.75
4. 2.66
4. 2.63
6. 2.69
7. 2.80
8. 2.71
9. 2.74
10. 2.69
The logger gave a "blip" when hitting 60 so the only variable is my right foot.
How can I translate this in braking power ?
Is there a formula for it or something to compare with ?
Creepy
PS : the first time is slower because the brakes where a little on the cold side !
#3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Land without a governement...LOL
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That one I already knew.
I just want this numbers compare with something..
Is there a way to calculate the G-force out of this ?
Or is there anyway to compare this with braking force from other cars ?
Creepy
I just want this numbers compare with something..
Is there a way to calculate the G-force out of this ?
Or is there anyway to compare this with braking force from other cars ?
Creepy
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: oustide the asylum?
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you make the assumption (possibly flawed ) that you have uniform deceleration, then you can use the uniform acceleration equations to work out the acceleration and F=ma to work out the force. These will, of course be rough averages...
http://www.physchem.co.za/Graphs/Equations.htm
http://www.physchem.co.za/Graphs/Equations.htm
#5
I hill climb my STI, and we measure to 1/100th of a second the start line 'G. There is a light beam at the start and one set at exactly 64 feet on from the start beam. If you cut the 64 ft beam in 2 seconds it equals 1 G accelleration.( 1 G is 32 ft/sec)
My STi on Kumho's and 314 bhp does the 64 in 2.06 secs.
Just maybe this will help?
A good EVO will do the same in 1.9secs, and there is an AUDI Quattro which will pull 1.7 secs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dream on.
Graham.
My STi on Kumho's and 314 bhp does the 64 in 2.06 secs.
Just maybe this will help?
A good EVO will do the same in 1.9secs, and there is an AUDI Quattro which will pull 1.7 secs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dream on.
Graham.
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
911,
Not having a go but I don't understand the 64' after two seconds thing.
Gravity is 9.8 metres per second, per second, which is approx. 32fp/s/s.
If you instantly started accelerating at 1G, you'd do 32' in one second, and 64' in the second second, a total of 96' after two seconds.
Vindaloo.
Not having a go but I don't understand the 64' after two seconds thing.
Gravity is 9.8 metres per second, per second, which is approx. 32fp/s/s.
If you instantly started accelerating at 1G, you'd do 32' in one second, and 64' in the second second, a total of 96' after two seconds.
Vindaloo.
Trending Topics
#10
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Land without a governement...LOL
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Glenn, you mention linear declaration (wich is not right), what sort of deviation are we talking about here ?
1.03 G is pretty impressive (personal speaking), but I think it's more in the 0.9-0.95 G...
Creepy (anyway, the car brakes good)
1.03 G is pretty impressive (personal speaking), but I think it's more in the 0.9-0.95 G...
Creepy (anyway, the car brakes good)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Adam Kindness
ScoobyNet General
0
15 September 2015 03:31 PM