0-100 km/t - 0-200 km/t(0-62mp/h -0-125mp/h)
12 December 2000, 12:28 AM
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Islington
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
quick enough to make my 2 year old son grin like a cheshire cat.
This isn't a mine's better than yours thread is it?
Have you got gold wheels? I think that's a factor.
This isn't a mine's better than yours thread is it?
Have you got gold wheels? I think that's a factor.
12 December 2000, 01:31 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Norup, Denmark
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Denmark:
<B>I would like to now what your times are.
Mine are 0-100km/t-0-62mph=4,8sek.
0-200km/t-0-125mph=16 sek.[/quote]
euro spec 218ps 0,9 bar.
now running 1,5 peak.
kn-kit.
second kat gone.+remus tail.
fuel cut defender+bleedvalve+chip.
<B>I would like to now what your times are.
Mine are 0-100km/t-0-62mph=4,8sek.
0-200km/t-0-125mph=16 sek.[/quote]
euro spec 218ps 0,9 bar.
now running 1,5 peak.
kn-kit.
second kat gone.+remus tail.
fuel cut defender+bleedvalve+chip.
Trending Topics
12 December 2000, 02:54 PM
#8
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Denmark - impressive figures, how were they measured.
What chip have you got? What held boost?
Do you have to replace the turbo or pistons after 16 seconds at full boost?!
Richard
What chip have you got? What held boost?
Do you have to replace the turbo or pistons after 16 seconds at full boost?!
Richard
12 December 2000, 04:56 PM
#9
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Norup, Denmark
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it is measured by a codriver by stopwatch!!!.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:<HR>Originally posted by dowser:
<B>Denmark - impressive figures, how were they measured.
What chip have you got? What held boost?
Do you have to replace the turbo or pistons after 16 seconds at full boost?!
Richard[/quote]
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:<HR>Originally posted by dowser:
<B>Denmark - impressive figures, how were they measured.
What chip have you got? What held boost?
Do you have to replace the turbo or pistons after 16 seconds at full boost?!
Richard[/quote]
13 December 2000, 06:44 PM
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
0-60....4.5 secs
0-100...13.2 secs
Not done a 0-125, but 16 secs sounds quick.
Both done using Datron timing gear (in the rain!), with a UK spec car running 1 bar, approx 235bhp (Good day that, wasn't it Craig?
)
£50 to anyone that beats these times with a similar spec car...and can prove it!
Stef.
0-100...13.2 secs
Not done a 0-125, but 16 secs sounds quick.
Both done using Datron timing gear (in the rain!), with a UK spec car running 1 bar, approx 235bhp (Good day that, wasn't it Craig?
)£50 to anyone that beats these times with a similar spec car...and can prove it!
Stef.
13 December 2000, 09:08 PM
#13
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 3,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My one timed attempt back in phase one times gave 3.8 seconds (actually 3.78ish) 0 to 60. That was with a passenger and full tank of petrol... I suspect the car is faster now.
[This message has been edited by MorayMackenzie (edited 13 December 2000).]
[This message has been edited by MorayMackenzie (edited 13 December 2000).]
13 December 2000, 09:12 PM
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Really Moray - who's timimg gear?
Good time............
so now it must be 2.5
Stef,
Yep, the good times - when the car sounded normal, not like it's got a bearing out, like now
Good time............
so now it must be 2.5
Stef,
Yep, the good times - when the car sounded normal, not like it's got a bearing out, like now
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post