£1/litre petrol
#2
personally id prefer this... makes more sense.
but 20p/l more expensive? i dont think so - thats about twice what the average (10-12k/year, 300 miles from a tank) motorist pays for car tax. that sounds more like a scheme to increase total revenue than to keep revenue constant merely changing the method.
but 20p/l more expensive? i dont think so - thats about twice what the average (10-12k/year, 300 miles from a tank) motorist pays for car tax. that sounds more like a scheme to increase total revenue than to keep revenue constant merely changing the method.
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: In a house
Posts: 5,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Um without tax discs, how can we ensure that the other party has MOT or insurance? If you got into a crashed with someone without insurance you'd get nothing out of it..
#5
u could still have the concept of a disc on the car - but u just wouldnt have to pay for it. it would be like a "my car is legal" disc.
or just punish people more harshly for no mot or insurance - and make them pay for any damage they cause.
other countries seem to manage just fine without car tax
or just punish people more harshly for no mot or insurance - and make them pay for any damage they cause.
other countries seem to manage just fine without car tax
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2p on the price of a litre will cover the tax disc cost per year (assuming 8000 miles p/a or so).
Make it law to have an insurance disc (and an MOT one?) instead of the tax disc.
Simple.
But the government don't like simple ideas because they are usually transparent and therefore more difficult to generate more revenue, which, let's face it, is all they are really interested in.
Make it law to have an insurance disc (and an MOT one?) instead of the tax disc.
Simple.
But the government don't like simple ideas because they are usually transparent and therefore more difficult to generate more revenue, which, let's face it, is all they are really interested in.
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agree 100%, a flat rate tax on the car whether it's used or not is ridiculous. Why should I pay the same for my Westfield (which spends about 350 days/year in the garage) as I do for the Scooby? It makes my blood boil.
Ideally we'd have the cost of 3rd party insurance included with fuel, so there would be no need to prove that either - and it would make life a lot easier for people buying, selling and importing cars too. The only thing which would then need to be displayed on the car would then be an MOT disc to prove that the car was (once) roadworthy.
Ideally we'd have the cost of 3rd party insurance included with fuel, so there would be no need to prove that either - and it would make life a lot easier for people buying, selling and importing cars too. The only thing which would then need to be displayed on the car would then be an MOT disc to prove that the car was (once) roadworthy.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interestingly it said on the beeb news this morning that insurance was likely to go up an average of 60 quid a year as a result of those motorists not having insurance.
So, for those that say they can't afford insurance and hence go without, how is that going to make it easier for them to afford it and become honest citizens again?????
I'd be happy to pay an extra 5p a litre on fuel to cover car tax. Think an extra 20 odd pence would be a bit much though
So, for those that say they can't afford insurance and hence go without, how is that going to make it easier for them to afford it and become honest citizens again?????
I'd be happy to pay an extra 5p a litre on fuel to cover car tax. Think an extra 20 odd pence would be a bit much though
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, for those that say they can't afford insurance
#10
If you do the maths, it works out to be a shocking amount for any car used regularly.
I do an average 14,000 miles a year, mix of work and SDP. Even at the average of 48MPG I get from the Passat I would pay £330 per year in tax (or £200 extra), if the road fund license was replaced by a 25p per litre fuel surcharge.
Let's hope Gordon Brown doesn't do the same sums himself, eh?
I do an average 14,000 miles a year, mix of work and SDP. Even at the average of 48MPG I get from the Passat I would pay £330 per year in tax (or £200 extra), if the road fund license was replaced by a 25p per litre fuel surcharge.
Let's hope Gordon Brown doesn't do the same sums himself, eh?
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Faster than a quickshift.... get yourself a bionic arm ;)
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If this goes ahead, its another nail in the coffin for gas guzzeling cars like the scooby
I use my car every day and do around 12k a year.
I would seriously think about getting a little run around KA for every day use.
Alright, it would be another insurance policy, but cheaper petrol, less mileage on the scooby and possibly cheaper insurance on it for a limited mileage policy.
I dont really want to be forced down this road though
Perhaps it would be a better idea to come down hard on the scumbags who drive without road tax when they are caught (not very often i know)[img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img][img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]
Greg
#15
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: No longer Japan !
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...100 octane petrol at 100 yen/litre (about 50p) is good, but tolls on expressways aren't cheap (6400yen for return home yesterday = about £30) and don't even mention the tax on cars here which makes £150 VED look like a raving bargain !
Psycologically though, filling up for about £20 feels much better
Psycologically though, filling up for about £20 feels much better
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 9,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At 20p/litre I would most definately have to buy a second commuter car as i do about 28k miles pa!! However a few pence would be fine. The idea's a good'un IF it's not used as an INCREASED revenue source.
Andy
Andy
#17
Driving without insurance may give you a fine of £300 plus 5 points if caught. I'd guess that's the maths that some people do when they choose not to have insurance. If they kill someone then they run away (oh and they don't register the car in their name when bought).
Sad but true!
F
Sad but true!
F
#18
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
but 20p/l more expensive? i dont think so - thats about twice what the average (10-12k/year, 300 miles from a tank) motorist pays for car tax. that sounds more like a scheme to increase total revenue than to keep revenue constant merely changing the method.
From the Lying Labour party?
Surely not?:
Alcazar
#19
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
And further to my above post. I reckon we'll all STILL have to register our cars on a national database for PNC etc etc.
They would probably do this for a nominal sum of £25 per year, which would, of course, have to rise with inflation, with a a little bit more to cover costs of setting up etc etc, and would soon be over £100.
They could call it "Road Tax"...................oh, sorry, isn't that where we came in???:
Alcazar
They would probably do this for a nominal sum of £25 per year, which would, of course, have to rise with inflation, with a a little bit more to cover costs of setting up etc etc, and would soon be over £100.
They could call it "Road Tax"...................oh, sorry, isn't that where we came in???:
Alcazar
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oilman
Trader Announcements
15
01 October 2015 11:55 AM