Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

whats the difference between SO2's/SO3's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2001 | 08:28 AM
  #1  
ernie's Avatar
ernie
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Question

greetings all

is there a difference? have SO3's replaced SO2's?
I currently have SO2's and think they are excellent. I just wonder what the situation is.

thanks
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2001 | 09:23 AM
  #2  
bb's Avatar
bb
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Post

The SO3's are just the replacement for the SO2's which have been discontinued. So according to all the promotions, its supposed to have all the positive charaateristics of the SO2's plus better wear rate, response etc. etc. I've not used them myself but i've read on this BBS that some still prefer the SO2's to SO3's despite all the claims by Bridgestone. I hope I'm not BS'ing about something you already know. Do a quick search, I'm sure I've read about it on here but in the tyres section!
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2001 | 09:27 AM
  #3  
ernie's Avatar
ernie
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Post

thank you sir!
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2001 | 10:20 AM
  #4  
ChrisB's Avatar
ChrisB
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 23,573
Likes: 0
From: Staffs
Post

Next question...

I am right in thinking that SO2s are different from SO2 Pole Positions?

ChrisB.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2001 | 11:22 AM
  #5  
GaryC's Avatar
GaryC
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 0
Post

Yes S02s are different from S02 PPs.

They look pretty much the same (only really the side wall is different) Normal S02s are a slightly softer compound and, IMO, are better in the dry. PPs have a dual compound to retain their wet grip even when the tread is minimal.


From what I am told, SO3s are not technically the replacement for S02s. They are acting as such as S02s are being phased out, but S03s are a more 'general all rounder'. There are S04s in the pipeline that will be the true high performance replacement for S02 PPs.

FYI - S01s were also a more all round tyre, but with a high but dry performance bias (designed for use in Japan and other drier countries).
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2001 | 11:23 AM
  #6  
GaryC's Avatar
GaryC
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 0
Post

Yes S02s are different from S02 PPs.

They look pretty much the same (only really the side wall is different) Normal S02s are a slightly softer compound and, IMO, are better in the dry. PPs have a dual compound to retain their wet grip even when the tread is minimal.


From what I am told, SO3s are not technically the replacement for S02s. They are acting as such as S02s are being phased out, but S03s are a more 'general all rounder'. There are S04s in the pipeline that will be the true high performance replacement for S02 PPs.

FYI - S01s were also a more all round tyre, but with a high but dry performance bias (designed for use in Japan and other drier countries).
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2001 | 10:48 AM
  #7  
dteagles's Avatar
dteagles
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Post

I have seen some info for S03 Pole Position tyres, would these now be the equivalent of the S02 PP as opposed to an S04?

Has anybody tried the S03 PP (if it's available yes) and if so, what are they like?

Darren
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2001 | 05:05 PM
  #8  
ian_sadler's Avatar
ian_sadler
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,170
Likes: 0
From: there or there abouts
Thumbs up

I have 16" SO-3 PP's.

I like 'em but I've not had a play with SO-2's so I can't compare.

ian
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2001 | 05:13 PM
  #9  
Robertio's Avatar
Robertio
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 9,844
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Lightbulb

I've S03 PP's (on 17") based on the: if you can't say anything nice policy, I'll stay quiet, but will recommend Toyos over them by a fair margin, even if their tyre life is a bit limited.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2001 | 05:16 PM
  #10  
SDB's Avatar
SDB
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
Post

Completely agree with Robertio
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2001 | 05:20 PM
  #11  
dteagles's Avatar
dteagles
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Post

What's the difference in price range of the Bridgestones vs the Toyo's?

I have been led to belive that the Toyo's are cheaper?

Also, has anyone tried any Yoko's? They were always the tyre of choice on Westfields/Caterhams etc for road use?

Cheers,
Darren.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2001 | 05:41 PM
  #12  
Robertio's Avatar
Robertio
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 9,844
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Talking

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Simon de Banke:
<B>Completely agree with Robertio [/quote]


Robertio prints out post to A1 and has framed copy on his wall

Darren, depends on the place, shop around, but the Toyos should be £15+ cheaper a corner
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2001 | 12:02 PM
  #13  
Kippax's Avatar
Kippax
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Thumbs up

Darren,

Yokahama AVS Sports are a wicked tyre wrongly underated IMO. They wear pretty quick but are a nice soft compound and monster in the dry.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2001 | 12:28 PM
  #14  
Gerg2's Avatar
Gerg2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,955
Likes: 0
Post

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Simon De Bank:
<B>Completely agree with Robertio</B> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

/me falls on floor
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
scoobhunter722
ScoobyNet General
52
Oct 20, 2015 04:32 PM
KK3960
General Technical
3
Oct 7, 2015 12:33 PM
bluebullet29
General Technical
9
Oct 5, 2015 02:17 PM
blackieblob
ScoobyNet General
4
Oct 1, 2015 11:37 AM
jonnyricer2
Wanted
2
Sep 30, 2015 06:52 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:42 AM.