2010 Subaru 'Saloon' WRX STI 2.5
#1
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Dudley, West Midlands
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 Subaru 'Saloon' WRX STI 2.5
Does this model and its engine fall into the same engines used in the WRX STI hatch - prone engine failure? Or did they change it for the saloon model?
Thanks
Thanks
#3
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Dudley, West Midlands
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok thanks, so from 2011 upwards was anything revised? Put me right off buying the hatch a year ago and im really set on buying a saloon.
So to clarify even a 2013 model would have the same lump?
Cheers
So to clarify even a 2013 model would have the same lump?
Cheers
Last edited by Shil; 01 September 2017 at 12:13 PM.
#4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
No nothing has changed. Subaru refuse to admit there are well documented problems so continue to use the same faulty parts in all models from 2006 onwards. Few minor changes, but nothing to rectify the issues.
That said, I've owned 2.5 engine Subaru's for the last 10 years now and I really wouldn't be too worried about it. They are great cars to drive daily and I've had no problems at all. Keep it serviced, well maintained, get it mapped properly to get rid of the Subaru map and just enjoy it.
That said, I've owned 2.5 engine Subaru's for the last 10 years now and I really wouldn't be too worried about it. They are great cars to drive daily and I've had no problems at all. Keep it serviced, well maintained, get it mapped properly to get rid of the Subaru map and just enjoy it.
#5
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Dudley, West Midlands
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No nothing has changed. Subaru refuse to admit there are well documented problems so continue to use the same faulty parts in all models from 2006 onwards. Few minor changes, but nothing to rectify the issues.
That said, I've owned 2.5 engine Subaru's for the last 10 years now and I really wouldn't be too worried about it. They are great cars to drive daily and I've had no problems at all. Keep it serviced, well maintained, get it mapped properly to get rid of the Subaru map and just enjoy it.
That said, I've owned 2.5 engine Subaru's for the last 10 years now and I really wouldn't be too worried about it. They are great cars to drive daily and I've had no problems at all. Keep it serviced, well maintained, get it mapped properly to get rid of the Subaru map and just enjoy it.
got to find the right one. The servicing is something I always look out for.
I will continue to look around the forums for all my other research so appreciate your advice here. Thanks
Trending Topics
#10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
No nothing has changed. Subaru refuse to admit there are well documented problems so continue to use the same faulty parts in all models from 2006 onwards. Few minor changes, but nothing to rectify the issues.
That said, I've owned 2.5 engine Subaru's for the last 10 years now and I really wouldn't be too worried about it. They are great cars to drive daily and I've had no problems at all. Keep it serviced, well maintained, get it mapped properly to get rid of the Subaru map and just enjoy it.
That said, I've owned 2.5 engine Subaru's for the last 10 years now and I really wouldn't be too worried about it. They are great cars to drive daily and I've had no problems at all. Keep it serviced, well maintained, get it mapped properly to get rid of the Subaru map and just enjoy it.
You'd like to think Prodrives maps were good though wouldn't you?
#11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
In short, not really no. Personally I wouldn't trust a performance map that wasn't written specifically for the car it was meant for. The Prodrive map is a one size fits all map increasing timing and risks without knowing what engine it's running on. If I bought a car with a Prodrive map I'd have it re-mapped straight away IMO.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
csm2760
Subaru
13
29 March 2017 04:38 PM
csm2760
Subaru
0
14 September 2016 12:55 PM