Dear oh dear.......
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Dear oh dear.......
If this is true it will be a disaster. I had no problem with M division turning to turbo charging, actually I, unlike lots of other M enthusiasts thought it would be an improvement. But this???
http://www.pistonheads.com/news/defa...?storyId=23192
Trending Topics
#8
Is there still an issue with PDK though? I thought the main problem with it was when it first came out it could only be had with counter-intuitive buttons rather than paddles. This has now been rectified. PDK is much better than tip.
#10
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Auto is an auto...being semi-automatic, dual clutch or whatever. The type of auto doesn't bother me. The exception being if is a CVT rubber-band drive, great for F1 cars (which is why they were banned), but rubbish on road cars.
On that premise there is nothing wrong with a epicyclic transmission that uses planetary gearsets (i.e the old school automatic). How it 'feels' Is down to how its been calibrated to engage each clutch or brake band (thats how old fashioned autos obtain gears...via a series of clutches and brake bands; All gears are always meshed all of the time). They can all have flappy paddle, sequential shift, tiptronic, be hard or slushy regardless of internal design.
They can be made to change with instant brutal hard shifts - As hard and fast than DSG or semi-auto-sequential (and why top fuel drag racers use them), the torque convertor can be substituted for a automated clutch unit (like a DSG or automated manual/semi auto/sequetial), and in 99% of modern boxes this is the case anyway as the converter is locked up from 3rd gear onwards....some can be calibrated lock up on 1st gear, which believe me is fun on a big BHP American V8
So what I'm saying is the type of automatic transmission doesn't bother me - to me, its a automatic reagrdless. The only thing that differs is how slushy/hard the manufacturers specifies it.
The fact that no conventional manual option is offered is what really bother me, just like feather-light over-assisted steering and over-assisted brakes. and non switchable trraction/stability control.
On that premise there is nothing wrong with a epicyclic transmission that uses planetary gearsets (i.e the old school automatic). How it 'feels' Is down to how its been calibrated to engage each clutch or brake band (thats how old fashioned autos obtain gears...via a series of clutches and brake bands; All gears are always meshed all of the time). They can all have flappy paddle, sequential shift, tiptronic, be hard or slushy regardless of internal design.
They can be made to change with instant brutal hard shifts - As hard and fast than DSG or semi-auto-sequential (and why top fuel drag racers use them), the torque convertor can be substituted for a automated clutch unit (like a DSG or automated manual/semi auto/sequetial), and in 99% of modern boxes this is the case anyway as the converter is locked up from 3rd gear onwards....some can be calibrated lock up on 1st gear, which believe me is fun on a big BHP American V8
So what I'm saying is the type of automatic transmission doesn't bother me - to me, its a automatic reagrdless. The only thing that differs is how slushy/hard the manufacturers specifies it.
The fact that no conventional manual option is offered is what really bother me, just like feather-light over-assisted steering and over-assisted brakes. and non switchable trraction/stability control.
Last edited by ALi-B; 01 March 2011 at 06:51 PM. Reason: couldn't think of the word: epicyclic
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Dual clutch gearboxes work superbly with a turbocharged engine though, and are superb for launching. Constant acceleration, constant full boost. A manual gearbox in the same circumstances is slow and fragile.
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Can a conventional auto give constant accleration? What car is it in?
In my dual clutch datalogs I see an ignition retard for about 20ms, but I can't measure any actual drop in acceleration through a change that is away from the trend of gradually reducing accleration with speed.
In my dual clutch datalogs I see an ignition retard for about 20ms, but I can't measure any actual drop in acceleration through a change that is away from the trend of gradually reducing accleration with speed.
Last edited by john banks; 01 March 2011 at 07:09 PM.
#14
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Thankfully it has a DCT after all, first drive video here.
http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/f10...ml#post2024218
http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/f10...ml#post2024218
#18
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post