Ford Racing Puma
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Infractions - Scoobynet's version of the "scamera" van
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fantastic cars. One of the best handling FWD cars ever made - right up there with the DC2 Integra.
152 bhp? I think? Its not a lot, but its enough.
Hard riding & noisy but easy to drive.
Watch for:
Brakes - many reports of siezed pistons due to insufficient dust shields
Stonechips - many cars will have resprayed wings front and rear due to this so don't be put off by paintwork unless due to accident damage
Rust - they are all prone to rusting where the rear "outer" wing joins the sills and inner wing sections. Check the fronts also.
buy the best example you can find.
HTH
152 bhp? I think? Its not a lot, but its enough.
Hard riding & noisy but easy to drive.
Watch for:
Brakes - many reports of siezed pistons due to insufficient dust shields
Stonechips - many cars will have resprayed wings front and rear due to this so don't be put off by paintwork unless due to accident damage
Rust - they are all prone to rusting where the rear "outer" wing joins the sills and inner wing sections. Check the fronts also.
buy the best example you can find.
HTH
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agreed - Superb handling only matched by the ST170 (the best handling FWD car I've driven, but not been in an ITR).
The 1.7 is great but has drum brakes at the rear - Not good.
Other than that they look great, especially in "racing" spec.
The 1.7 is great but has drum brakes at the rear - Not good.
Other than that they look great, especially in "racing" spec.
Trending Topics
#8
Cool cars. i'm sure you will be nicking off in it from time to time if she does have one lol.
i think 155 ish bhp and the handling set up is fine really. bearing in mind the people that comment on them not being very fast do drive subaru imprezas ..so they are bound to think this
if you go on the racing puma owners webpage theres an indepth section on when the standard cars went to tickford and underwent their change to the racing versions. enjoyed seeing them being put together.
i think 155 ish bhp and the handling set up is fine really. bearing in mind the people that comment on them not being very fast do drive subaru imprezas ..so they are bound to think this
if you go on the racing puma owners webpage theres an indepth section on when the standard cars went to tickford and underwent their change to the racing versions. enjoyed seeing them being put together.
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 10,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matteeboy
Agreed - Superb handling only matched by the ST170 (the best handling FWD car I've driven, but not been in an ITR).
The ST170 handling was ok, no match for my 205 which is 10-15 years older!
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As above.
Brakes have no dust shields as are proper racing brakes.
Mat had one for about 5ish years and its never missed a beat. interior is cool but not to everyones taste.
Brakes have no dust shields as are proper racing brakes.
Mat had one for about 5ish years and its never missed a beat. interior is cool but not to everyones taste.
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ScoobyJawa
The ST170 handling was ok, no match for my 205 which is 10-15 years older!
Let's face it, most modern cars don't handle as well but the brake a lot better.
205 handles well, but like the mk2 Golf GTi, it's a bit overhyped.
Lift off oversteer into a hedge anyone?!
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Infractions - Scoobynet's version of the "scamera" van
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matteeboy
Let's face it, most modern cars don't handle as well but the brake a lot better.
205 handles well, but like the mk2 Golf GTi, it's a bit overhyped.
Lift off oversteer into a hedge anyone?!
205 handles well, but like the mk2 Golf GTi, it's a bit overhyped.
Lift off oversteer into a hedge anyone?!
Its called adjustability.
Mate, if you think an st170 is good, blag a drive in a DC2 Integra
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 10,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOO is what makes things fun, you get to do it on command too! As for braking, GTi-6 conversion is cheap as chips and provides phenomenal stopping ability. Certainly isn't overhyped and its a better handling/drivers car than a MK2.
Just my thoughts , however, I've been in plenty of other FWD that handled better than an ST170 IMHO. Not particularly pokey either........ I'd take a GTi-6/Rallye over one anyday....... but thats another thread.
Racing Puma certainly also has a good rep, standard car was pretty good
Just my thoughts , however, I've been in plenty of other FWD that handled better than an ST170 IMHO. Not particularly pokey either........ I'd take a GTi-6/Rallye over one anyday....... but thats another thread.
Racing Puma certainly also has a good rep, standard car was pretty good
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Evo say "brilliant handling" for the ST170 which I agree with.
I'd never buy one because the engine is lame but it does handle very well indeed.
But then I've not driven the ITR - Only a CTR which had okayish but not brilliant handling.
I'd never buy one because the engine is lame but it does handle very well indeed.
But then I've not driven the ITR - Only a CTR which had okayish but not brilliant handling.
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Infractions - Scoobynet's version of the "scamera" van
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matteeboy
Evo say "brilliant handling" for the ST170 which I agree with.
I'd never buy one because the engine is lame but it does handle very well indeed.
But then I've not driven the ITR - Only a CTR which had okayish but not brilliant handling.
I'd never buy one because the engine is lame but it does handle very well indeed.
But then I've not driven the ITR - Only a CTR which had okayish but not brilliant handling.
ITR and CTR are chalk and cheese.
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ///\oo/\\\
Well, if you's an Evo fan, Evo recon that the ITR is not just the best handling FWD car of all time, but one of the best drivers cars period.
ITR and CTR are chalk and cheese.
ITR and CTR are chalk and cheese.
Handling is my number one priority over 0-60 times, bhp, etc.
Driven plenty of very nice handling RWD and 4WD cars though to make up for it!
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Essex/E London
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There was a recall for a certain rear suspension component that was quite serious so bear that in mind when you view one.
A mate of mine had a beautiful one for a few years and got right into the whole ownership thing.
I'll ask him for some pointers next time I see him for you. What he doesn't know about buying and running them isn't worth knowing
Oh and his was an everyday car as well so definately no problems there.
A mate of mine had a beautiful one for a few years and got right into the whole ownership thing.
I'll ask him for some pointers next time I see him for you. What he doesn't know about buying and running them isn't worth knowing
Oh and his was an everyday car as well so definately no problems there.
#20
They are now very rare cars and I have seen very low miles examples selling for the thick end of 10 grand! Was looking for one a while ago for a friend but he went for a different car in the end.
#21
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Also known as The Gimp
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Moley, great car mate.
I almost bought number #49 a year ago for amanda during her ever changing car game.
Just remind your misses that the front is a little wider mate thats all.
Good luck and let me know as I wouldn't mind a little go in it myself. With her consent of course.
Steve
I almost bought number #49 a year ago for amanda during her ever changing car game.
Just remind your misses that the front is a little wider mate thats all.
Good luck and let me know as I wouldn't mind a little go in it myself. With her consent of course.
Steve
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Essex/E London
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know its been a while but I said I'd get some more info for ya
Right, 1st 100 had LSD, it was an option on the remainder but wasn't made clear so if you find 1 with an LSD thats not 001-100 then you've found an enthusiasts car!!!
Rear arches gather stone chips very easily so if its not got any then its had paint so start looking at how far they went with paint. Obviously if 1 side is far worse than the other then its an idea to look deeper into it.
The front mesh rusts on later examples, so do the lower front wishbones – Ford forgot to paint them properly!
The steering wheel wears abnormally quickly.
When you open the boot any rain water runs straight into the boot so don't assume that a damp boot carpet is serious. It might just have been this poor design.
There was a recall for rear brake components but Ford wouldn't tell him what it was or for what reason
HTH
Right, 1st 100 had LSD, it was an option on the remainder but wasn't made clear so if you find 1 with an LSD thats not 001-100 then you've found an enthusiasts car!!!
Rear arches gather stone chips very easily so if its not got any then its had paint so start looking at how far they went with paint. Obviously if 1 side is far worse than the other then its an idea to look deeper into it.
The front mesh rusts on later examples, so do the lower front wishbones – Ford forgot to paint them properly!
The steering wheel wears abnormally quickly.
When you open the boot any rain water runs straight into the boot so don't assume that a damp boot carpet is serious. It might just have been this poor design.
There was a recall for rear brake components but Ford wouldn't tell him what it was or for what reason
HTH
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pro-Line Motorsport
Car Parts For Sale
2
29 September 2015 07:36 PM