E46 M3 V Boxster S
20 June 2003, 11:25 AM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
M3 right?
I was a Bedford Autodrome in my mates M3 yesterday and as hard as he try he could not catch the Boxster S, even with a 1km straight! Thats an 80 bhp advantage!
I was a Bedford Autodrome in my mates M3 yesterday and as hard as he try he could not catch the Boxster S, even with a 1km straight! Thats an 80 bhp advantage!
20 June 2003, 11:33 AM
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lots of different places! (Thank you Mr. Lambert)
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The legend of the M3 suffers another dent - hahaha!
Wasn't it Bedford Autodrome where the M3 was found to have the same lap time as the over 2 ton Porshe Cayenne and to be 4 seconds (yes 4) slower than an EVO (7 or 8 I think).
Ever thought that it may actually not be as good as it's cracked up to be - the marketing men aren't always right you know.
Regards,
tiggers.
Wasn't it Bedford Autodrome where the M3 was found to have the same lap time as the over 2 ton Porshe Cayenne and to be 4 seconds (yes 4) slower than an EVO (7 or 8 I think).
Ever thought that it may actually not be as good as it's cracked up to be - the marketing men aren't always right you know.
Regards,
tiggers.
20 June 2003, 11:47 AM
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did a track day at Bedford about 6 weeks ago and Tim Harvey was there in a E46 M3!
I was driving my STI RA which is pretty well set up for the track, 330bhp, Brembo brakes, uprated suspension and was quicker that every other car including an Ariel Atom, Lotus Exige, Loads of Caterfields etc!!
I couldn't overtake Tim in his M3 no matter how hard I tried, spun it twice was trying too hard....do you think the M3 was only that quick because of having a professional driver at the wheel????
Dom.
I was driving my STI RA which is pretty well set up for the track, 330bhp, Brembo brakes, uprated suspension and was quicker that every other car including an Ariel Atom, Lotus Exige, Loads of Caterfields etc!!
I couldn't overtake Tim in his M3 no matter how hard I tried, spun it twice was trying too hard....do you think the M3 was only that quick because of having a professional driver at the wheel????
Dom.
Trending Topics
20 June 2003, 12:28 PM
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
You running slicks davyboy? Edit to say you cant be as still road legal.....those semi-cut jobbies then? Test drove a limited edition Elise the other week with them on, amazing grip levels, far too high for the roads around Billing/Cogenhoe 
I've only been in an E46 M3 cabriolet and not the coupe (is there much of a speed/weight difference?) but i thought it was quicker than i remember the Boxster S being.
[Edited by Nat21 - 20/06/2003 12:34:25]
I've only been in an E46 M3 cabriolet and not the coupe (is there much of a speed/weight difference?) but i thought it was quicker than i remember the Boxster S being.
[Edited by Nat21 - 20/06/2003 12:34:25]
20 June 2003, 12:32 PM
#12
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am running Pirelli P Zero "C"s - effectively they are road legal slicks.
...and yes the difference they make is unreal.
I would think it gives about a 100bhp advantage.
I want to fit the M030 suspension stuff from the 968 CS on it, then a DPW and then the 300bhp upgrade. I think the car will be awesome once that has been done.
...and yes the difference they make is unreal.
I would think it gives about a 100bhp advantage.
I want to fit the M030 suspension stuff from the 968 CS on it, then a DPW and then the 300bhp upgrade. I think the car will be awesome once that has been done.
20 June 2003, 12:40 PM
#14
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont like using the tyres on the road - they dont feel very grippy unless you put some heat in them, and to put heat in them you have to drive harder than I would want on a road.
I will be taking them off the car tomorrow.
I would be happy to meet at some point though.
I will be taking them off the car tomorrow.
I would be happy to meet at some point though.
20 June 2003, 06:45 PM
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tiggers, different cars are suited to different tracks. I'm not surprised an Evo 7 or 8 is quicker than an M3 round a track. It'd make sense. For a start, an Evo 7 is about as quick as an M3 in a straight line anyway, so chuck in a few corners and the M3 is going to struggle. The Evo 7 has Active Yaw control, 4wd etc so you can literally pile into corners at loony speeds. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to work it out, does it? 
However, the M3 looks gorgeous, sounds gorgeous, has far superior build quality and you won't lose too much cash on it come resale time.
I don't think the M3 'legend' is going to suffer because someone has said a Boxster S out accelerated one, which could of been down to the drivers anyway.
Rich
However, the M3 looks gorgeous, sounds gorgeous, has far superior build quality and you won't lose too much cash on it come resale time.
I don't think the M3 'legend' is going to suffer because someone has said a Boxster S out accelerated one, which could of been down to the drivers anyway.
Rich
20 June 2003, 07:03 PM
#17
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think the M3 'legend' is going to suffer because someone has said a Boxster S out accelerated one
20 June 2003, 07:20 PM
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lots of different places! (Thank you Mr. Lambert)
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rich,
Therefore you are saying that the EVO 7 is the better performing car of the two despite the fact it is not far off half the price - right?
Trouble is most of the buying public don't understand that - they have been brainwashed by the marketing departments 'ultimate driving machine' BS.
Oh! and while we're on the subject who says the M3 looks gorgeous - it looks like a bland 3 series repmobile with bodykit and big wheels to me, but it's horses for courses I guess.
tiggers.
Therefore you are saying that the EVO 7 is the better performing car of the two despite the fact it is not far off half the price - right?
Trouble is most of the buying public don't understand that - they have been brainwashed by the marketing departments 'ultimate driving machine' BS.
Oh! and while we're on the subject who says the M3 looks gorgeous - it looks like a bland 3 series repmobile with bodykit and big wheels to me, but it's horses for courses I guess.
tiggers.
20 June 2003, 07:32 PM
#20
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was a coupe.
I hope it does not come across that I am slagging the M3 off, I thought it was a superb car.
What I am suprised about is how little 80bhp more made! I honestly though we would just wait fot a straight and drive past.
I hope it does not come across that I am slagging the M3 off, I thought it was a superb car.
What I am suprised about is how little 80bhp more made! I honestly though we would just wait fot a straight and drive past.
20 June 2003, 07:37 PM
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Davy, you said the M3 could not catch the Boxster, so I was presuming the Boxster was getting away? Therefore out accelerating? My mistake, sorry. Was it even then? Just the M3 was already behind?
Tiggers, you miss the point of an M3. The Evo is only meant as a performance car, it does nothing else. An M3 is a performance car, but that is not its sole purpose. It's comfortable, luxurious, looks stunning, rides well, has parts available off the shelf, or most of the time, the next morning. New M3 Coupés cost 42k, how much do new Evos cost nowadays?
Rich
Tiggers, you miss the point of an M3. The Evo is only meant as a performance car, it does nothing else. An M3 is a performance car, but that is not its sole purpose. It's comfortable, luxurious, looks stunning, rides well, has parts available off the shelf, or most of the time, the next morning. New M3 Coupés cost 42k, how much do new Evos cost nowadays?
Rich
20 June 2003, 08:14 PM
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lots of different places! (Thank you Mr. Lambert)
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rich,
I think we're going to have to disagree on this one - to me the M3 does not look stunning - it is average at best and extremely over priced for at least for what I want from a car.
I'll take the Evo VII and keep the change thanks.
tiggers.
I think we're going to have to disagree on this one - to me the M3 does not look stunning - it is average at best and extremely over priced for at least for what I want from a car.
I'll take the Evo VII and keep the change thanks.
tiggers.
20 June 2003, 08:16 PM
#26
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was it even then? Just the M3 was already behind?
20 June 2003, 10:16 PM
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lots of different places! (Thank you Mr. Lambert)
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chalkie,
It would have to be as otherwise you'd look pretty silly saying you paid more for the M3 and it's not as good as the P1.
BTW from here you look pretty silly!!!
Of course that is only my opinion based on what I want from a car.
tiggers.
It would have to be as otherwise you'd look pretty silly saying you paid more for the M3 and it's not as good as the P1.
BTW from here you look pretty silly!!!
Of course that is only my opinion based on what I want from a car.
tiggers.