Powering the future - fusion in four years?
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Powering the future - fusion in four years?
Saw an interesting video from a guy from Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works talking about how they have developed the technology to produce 100MW container sized mini power stations that produce enough output to power a small town of approx 50000 people. They say they should have a prototype working by 2017, and it runs on deuterium and tritium both easily available (from seawater).
This really could be a game changer if they pull it off
http://www.dvice.com/2013-2-22/lockh...wer-four-years
This really could be a game changer if they pull it off
http://www.dvice.com/2013-2-22/lockh...wer-four-years
#3
Saw an interesting video from a guy from Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works talking about how they have developed the technology to produce 100MW container sized mini power stations that produce enough output to power a small town of approx 50000 people. They say they should have a prototype working by 2017, and it runs on deuterium and tritium both easily available (from seawater).
This really could be a game changer if they pull it off
http://www.dvice.com/2013-2-22/lockh...wer-four-years
This really could be a game changer if they pull it off
http://www.dvice.com/2013-2-22/lockh...wer-four-years
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"No more oil, no more coal, no more nuclear, and not even any solar or wind or hydro will be necessary (unless you're into that sort of thing): fusion has the potential to produce as much affordable clean power as we'll ever need, for the entire world."
The oil companies may have something to say about that
TX.
The oil companies may have something to say about that
TX.
#11
The writer needs to learn the difference between a mW (milliwatt ie one thousandth of a watt) and a MW (megawatt ie a million watts)
Would be great if they can pull it off, but don't count on much change on much changes for consumers: fusion tax
Would be great if they can pull it off, but don't count on much change on much changes for consumers: fusion tax
#17
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've also been reading up on a competing technology, fission this time, Thorium power, especially from a LFTR (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_fluoride_thorium_reactor). Makes you realise how crap modern nuclear is. Did you realise that modern nuclear stations only use approx 0.7% of the fuel. The rest is thrown away as nuclear waste...
#18
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The current reactors exist to provide material for weapons....
Fusion has been coming for forty years, don't hold your breath waiting.
dunx
P.S. 100 mW is utterly crap a Duracell is better....
Fusion has been coming for forty years, don't hold your breath waiting.
dunx
P.S. 100 mW is utterly crap a Duracell is better....
Last edited by dunx; 29 September 2013 at 02:19 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
38
17 July 2016 10:43 PM