Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Royal Mail share offer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19 September 2013, 06:57 PM
  #1  
Dingdongler
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Dingdongler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 6,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Royal Mail share offer

Anybody going to buy some?
Old 19 September 2013, 10:47 PM
  #2  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Probably should do
Old 19 September 2013, 10:51 PM
  #3  
riiidaa
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
riiidaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Near Croydon
Posts: 3,349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tell Sid
Old 20 September 2013, 12:20 AM
  #4  
Boro
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Boro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 7,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If I see Sid, I'll tell him
Old 20 September 2013, 06:27 AM
  #5  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Is a business model so dependent on delivering unsolicited advertising material viable in the long term, or is it going to go the way of the video shop and other such dinosaurs?
In the age of email, I wonder if the government is doing the equivalent of Branson and his Virgin Megastores?
If it was on Dragons Den, they'd be having a right old laugh.
Old 20 September 2013, 06:50 AM
  #6  
Dingdongler
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Dingdongler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 6,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by cster
Is a business model so dependent on delivering unsolicited advertising material viable in the long term, or is it going to go the way of the video shop and other such dinosaurs?
In the age of email, I wonder if the government is doing the equivalent of Branson and his Virgin Megastores?
If it was on Dragons Den, they'd be having a right old laugh.

Not quite mate.

I'm no expert but a friend compiled a report for a big financial institution about the share offering and the RM business model etc.

It is actually a very viable business, the money is all in the parcel delivery side (given the rise of internet shopping etc)
Old 20 September 2013, 12:34 PM
  #7  
ReallyReallyGoodMeat
Scooby Regular
 
ReallyReallyGoodMeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Depends on the price, market cap, etc shirley.
Old 20 September 2013, 01:01 PM
  #8  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dingdongler
Not quite mate.

I'm no expert but a friend compiled a report for a big financial institution about the share offering and the RM business model etc.

It is actually a very viable business, the money is all in the parcel delivery side (given the rise of internet shopping etc)
This ^^^^ It's a good investment IMO!

Not that my lefty leanings will let me buy into some capitalist pig's bright idea
Old 20 September 2013, 01:37 PM
  #9  
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
c_maguire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wouldn't.

I was talking about this recently with our postie, a longterm employee who more or less confirmed what I suspected was the case in most large companies - too many chiefs, not enough indians, poor morale, ill-informed policies from management, stupid team-building courses, endless consultants, grafters propping up the ever increasing number of slackers who never seem to get pulled up for it.
According to him (and he's fairly cogent) he can't remember the last time he delivered a utility bill, which used to be a large part of the business, and but for Amazon they would probably be in some bother.

You only have to pay attention to a lot of their vehicles to get a hint. They don't clean them enough inside or out, many have faded paint on the front and roof like some sh#tty Corsa/Nova, they are not servicing them properly so they not infrequently roll up in rentals, hub caps missing, kerbed wheels etc.
If Royal Mail had some infrastructure such as the railways or the telephone network which other providers need to use then they might be worth a punt. But they don't. And all the profit is in parcels and the urban areas. Let the cherry picking commence in earnest.
Old 20 September 2013, 01:40 PM
  #10  
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
c_maguire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dingdongler
Not quite mate.

I'm no expert but a friend compiled a report for a big financial institution about the share offering and the RM business model etc.

It is actually a very viable business, the money is all in the parcel delivery side (given the rise of internet shopping etc)
Parcels are an open market.
I wonder how much of ParcelForce's business is as a result of brand loyalty as a result of the direct association with Royal Mail. Take that loyalty away by privatising Royal Mail and then what?
Old 20 September 2013, 02:20 PM
  #11  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Royal Mail have been systematically pricing themselves out fo the market.

It's now dearer to send the same parcel inland as it is to send it to France!
Old 20 September 2013, 06:59 PM
  #12  
PaulC72
Scooby Regular
 
PaulC72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: RIP Tam.
Posts: 5,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

they may be pricey, out of date but even privatised do you think the governement would let them fail? I don't becuase they are the original posting system for the country they carry the royal name etc so I think they would pump money into it until the cows come home, just like the banks ;-)
Old 20 September 2013, 08:22 PM
  #13  
BLU
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (27)
 
BLU's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Welsh Northland
Posts: 4,832
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The've actually got to float it on the stock exchange before anyone can buy shares Thats going to encounter some stiff public opposition imho.
Old 20 September 2013, 09:31 PM
  #14  
Dingdongler
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Dingdongler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 6,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by BLU
The've actually got to float it on the stock exchange before anyone can buy shares Thats going to encounter some stiff public opposition imho.


There is nothing that the public can do
Old 20 September 2013, 09:37 PM
  #15  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

When they privatised the railways, it was said that only 40 people in the UK thought it was a good idea.

Unfortunately, all of them were in John Major's cabinet......
Old 20 September 2013, 09:42 PM
  #16  
madscoob
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
madscoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: u cant touch this
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

parcal side of things is well pricey £11 to send a pair of shoes sold on ebay. it would of been £8.50 using tnt
Old 21 September 2013, 05:19 PM
  #17  
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by c_maguire
I wouldn't.

I was talking about this recently with our postie, a longterm employee who more or less confirmed what I suspected was the case in most large companies - too many chiefs, not enough indians, poor morale, ill-informed policies from management, stupid team-building courses, endless consultants, grafters propping up the ever increasing number of slackers who never seem to get pulled up for it.
According to him (and he's fairly cogent) he can't remember the last time he delivered a utility bill, which used to be a large part of the business, and but for Amazon they would probably be in some bother.

You only have to pay attention to a lot of their vehicles to get a hint. They don't clean them enough inside or out, many have faded paint on the front and roof like some sh#tty Corsa/Nova, they are not servicing them properly so they not infrequently roll up in rentals, hub caps missing, kerbed wheels etc.
If Royal Mail had some infrastructure such as the railways or the telephone network which other providers need to use then they might be worth a punt. But they don't. And all the profit is in parcels and the urban areas. Let the cherry picking commence in earnest.
Surely if all of the above is correct, which it is not , then there is plenty of reason to buy shares in the RM as all of your points are something that can, and will be addressed by the new management team that will be put in place once privatised.
Old 21 September 2013, 06:49 PM
  #18  
Dingdongler
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Dingdongler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 6,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
Surely if all of the above is correct, which it is not , then there is plenty of reason to buy shares in the RM as all of your points are something that can, and will be addressed by the new management team that will be put in place once privatised.


Chip, that's exactly what I thought.
Old 21 September 2013, 06:54 PM
  #19  
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLU
The've actually got to float it on the stock exchange before anyone can buy shares Thats going to encounter some stiff public opposition imho.
The only thing the public can do is not buy the shares. This will, I imagine not happen though.
Old 21 September 2013, 09:03 PM
  #20  
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
c_maguire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
Surely if all of the above is correct, which it is not , then there is plenty of reason to buy shares in the RM as all of your points are something that can, and will be addressed by the new management team that will be put in place once privatised.
Which bits aren't then?
And why would you think any new management team will do anything ultimately positive? As soon as you privatise and shareholders become the prime concern, Royal Mail will be well on its way to rural deliveries every two days, businesses will become priority customers at the expense of private customers etc.

Modern management stinks, because it doesn't manage. It facilitates, or some such garbage.


Buy the shares if you feel that confident.
Old 22 September 2013, 10:05 AM
  #21  
BLU
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (27)
 
BLU's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Welsh Northland
Posts: 4,832
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
Surely if all of the above is correct, which it is not
You reckon??
I think you'll find that a vote by CWU members says otherwise!!

Results from June 2013

Q1: Do you oppose the privatisation of Royal Mail? YES 96%
Q2: Do you support the boycott of competitors' mail? YES 92%
Q3: Do you support the CWU Pay claim? YES 99%
Q4: Do you support the policy of non-cooperation? YES 92%

Q4 is a result of what you think is not happening with regards to management and low morale etc........ Thats quite a percentage from a 74% turnout imho!

Source http://www.cwu.org/news/archive/ball...atisation.html

Last edited by BLU; 22 September 2013 at 10:17 AM.
Old 22 September 2013, 10:28 AM
  #22  
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Which goes to show how the posties are being manipulated by the leftie CWU. If you took most of those who voted aside and asked them why they were voting in this way they wouldn't have a clue.

8.6% over 3 years plus bonuses, they should be snapping their hands off.

Privatisation will happen like it or not.

It was the same when British Gas was privatised, the union idiots even claimed gas wouldn't be piped to outlying areas any more. All complete lefty bollocks of course.
Old 22 September 2013, 10:36 AM
  #23  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Being in private hands is absolutely no guarantee that a company will be well run I am afraid
Old 22 September 2013, 10:37 AM
  #24  
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Of course it's not, but a private firm has pressure from shareholders to perform efficiently. A state owned firm doesn’t have this pressure and so it is easier for them to be inefficient.
Old 22 September 2013, 10:45 AM
  #25  
BLU
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (27)
 
BLU's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Welsh Northland
Posts: 4,832
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
Which goes to show how the posties are being manipulated by the leftie CWU. If you took most of those who voted aside and asked them why they were voting in this way they wouldn't have a clue.

8.6% over 3 years plus bonuses, they should be snapping their hands off.

Privatisation will happen like it or not.

It was the same when British Gas was privatised, the union idiots even claimed gas wouldn't be piped to outlying areas any more. All complete lefty bollocks of course.
If you speak to a lot of lower grade RM managers I'm sure a fair few will agree with the posties, they're also being put under unreasonable pressure by higher management!! There is even talk of a joint strike with CWU and CMA. That would make things interesting!!
Lower management and the posties have turned the company around despite most of the technology being outdated and unreliable! Perhaps if they stopped focusing on privatisation and started re-investing the profit made (by the staff) RM could continue to run as it is without being a burden on the taxpayer, simples!!

You don't mention any of the unreasonable strings attached to the pay deal either...........
Old 22 September 2013, 10:49 AM
  #26  
BLU
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (27)
 
BLU's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Welsh Northland
Posts: 4,832
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
Of course it's not, but a private firm has pressure from shareholders to perform efficiently. A state owned firm doesn’t have this pressure and so it is easier for them to be inefficient.
Maybe it will be forced to run efficiently (it does alredy considering its outdated infrastructure though) but at what cost to workers terms and conditions. As soon as the three year deal expires most of the workforce will be forced to go either part time or on zero/one hour contracts. Hardly good for the economy. Thers a huge chance a foreign buyer will purchase RM meaning a lot of the profits may get taken out of our economy altogether....... its a disaster waiting to happen imho
Old 22 September 2013, 10:49 AM
  #27  
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLU
Lower management and the posties have turned the company around
Under the direction of the higher management I presume.
Old 22 September 2013, 10:51 AM
  #28  
BLU
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (27)
 
BLU's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Welsh Northland
Posts: 4,832
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
Under the direction of the higher management I presume.
I doubt it. I think you'll find that its the posties and lower managment who pass on their thoughts as to what will and won't work up to higher management who then take all the glory. Thats how businesses of all shapes and sizes work. Anyone who thinks otherwise is as naive as f*ck

Last edited by BLU; 22 September 2013 at 10:59 AM.
Old 22 September 2013, 10:56 AM
  #29  
BLU
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (27)
 
BLU's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Welsh Northland
Posts: 4,832
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
Royal Mail have been systematically pricing themselves out fo the market.

It's now dearer to send the same parcel inland as it is to send it to France!
Thats because its been starved of crucial investment by various different governments and seriously bad management over several decades! RM is now playing catch up, hence the sudden increase in prices.
TBH, though, the way they've started to price up parcels is commercial suicide....
Old 22 September 2013, 10:57 AM
  #30  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Leaving all the usual accepted SN bollocks of 'private companies are always wonderful, state run outfits are always terrible/the unions are the spawn of the devil' behind the sole reason the RM provatisation will be a good investment is exactly as Ding posted earlier.... Internet shopping is only going to continue to expand and grab more and more of the market as the high street is going into terminal decline partly through shortsightedness and the councils being too stupid to work out that if you charrge astronomic business rates and stupidly high charges to park people will find another way... the net!


Quick Reply: Royal Mail share offer



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:50 AM.