LG 3D tv
10 November 2012, 05:25 PM
#1
LG 3D tv
http://www.tesco.com/direct/lg-32lm3...skuId=557-6278
anyone got or know anything about this tv it uses 2d to 3d technology which means i can watch what i want in 3d apparently
anyone got or know anything about this tv it uses 2d to 3d technology which means i can watch what i want in 3d apparently
10 November 2012, 05:46 PM
#3
I don't know anything about that particular TV, but I've had a LG before and would never recommend anybody to buy one.
Mine had dead pixels after 2weeks and they (LG) refused to cover it under warranty as they weren't in the centre of the screen. The centre of the screen was a 2"x2" square, which on a 42" screen is quite small, and there had to be more than 3 within that area.
If I was buying a TV now I'd go to Comet and buy a Samsung or Panasonic
Also, 3d is only worth watching if the film was made specifically for it, IMO
Mine had dead pixels after 2weeks and they (LG) refused to cover it under warranty as they weren't in the centre of the screen. The centre of the screen was a 2"x2" square, which on a 42" screen is quite small, and there had to be more than 3 within that area.
If I was buying a TV now I'd go to Comet and buy a Samsung or Panasonic
Also, 3d is only worth watching if the film was made specifically for it, IMO
10 November 2012, 05:51 PM
#4
Scooby Regular
I don't know anything about that particular TV, but I've had a LG before and would never recommend anybody to buy one.
Mine had dead pixels after 2weeks and they (LG) refused to cover it under warranty as they weren't in the centre of the screen. The centre of the screen was a 2"x2" square, which on a 42" screen is quite small, and there had to be more than 3 within that area.
Mine had dead pixels after 2weeks and they (LG) refused to cover it under warranty as they weren't in the centre of the screen. The centre of the screen was a 2"x2" square, which on a 42" screen is quite small, and there had to be more than 3 within that area.
You need to grow a pair ..... see how I got all my money back ......
https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby...come-good.html
10 November 2012, 06:01 PM
#5
I'm sure that is a very interesting read and I appreciate you posting it for me but, I'm not reading 40 pages worth of posts when you've already told me the outcome. That is quite possibly the exact same tv I had though as it was the same month of the same year I bought mine.
The reason I didn't pursue it further was because it was just before I went away with work for a few months and it kind of got forgotten about, and i'm that rich I just bought a different one!
Anyway, OP, don't buy an LG and expect it to last
The reason I didn't pursue it further was because it was just before I went away with work for a few months and it kind of got forgotten about, and i'm that rich I just bought a different one!
Anyway, OP, don't buy an LG and expect it to last
10 November 2012, 06:03 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: morayshire, scotland
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2d-3d is a load of rubbish. i have a samsung 3d tv that also has this option.
if its not filmed in 3D in the first place then it looks stupids imo. nothing like a 3D film on blu-ray where its filmed with 2 cameras as such at slightly different angles
and its only HD ready to top it off.. id avoid it mate. get a 1080p screen
if its not filmed in 3D in the first place then it looks stupids imo. nothing like a 3D film on blu-ray where its filmed with 2 cameras as such at slightly different angles
and its only HD ready to top it off.. id avoid it mate. get a 1080p screen
Last edited by billyrogers; 10 November 2012 at 06:04 PM.
10 November 2012, 06:22 PM
#7
Scooby Regular
Trending Topics
10 November 2012, 06:24 PM
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2d-3d is pants
at least it is passive, and it isn't that cheap really as the 328 option is OOS but the same TV at 402 quid is in stock LOL
I don't condone this but you could buy one under distance selling regs and return if you don't like the 2d-3d conversion
at least it is passive, and it isn't that cheap really as the 328 option is OOS but the same TV at 402 quid is in stock LOL
I don't condone this but you could buy one under distance selling regs and return if you don't like the 2d-3d conversion
10 November 2012, 06:25 PM
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: morayshire, scotland
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
your better off with something like this if you want a 32" 3d TV
http://www.richersounds.com/product/...ams-ue32eh6030
but 3d is a novalty and id just got for a decent 1080P LED tv instead if i was to change
http://www.richersounds.com/product/...ams-ue32eh6030
but 3d is a novalty and id just got for a decent 1080P LED tv instead if i was to change
10 November 2012, 06:52 PM
#10
I'm not so sure I agree it's a novelty. I have it and don't use it every day, but that is because I think it's crap for anything other than 3d films.
I'd seriously consider the tv posted by above by billyrogers
I'd seriously consider the tv posted by above by billyrogers
11 November 2012, 10:33 AM
#11
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would avoid a 3D TV that small anyway. Get something much bigger or stick to 2D.
The sport is good in 3Dm and as previously menitioned, films made in 3D. Some of the nature programs in 3D are spectacular.
That said, we haven't watched anything in 3D for a very long time.
Geezer
The sport is good in 3Dm and as previously menitioned, films made in 3D. Some of the nature programs in 3D are spectacular.
That said, we haven't watched anything in 3D for a very long time.
Geezer
