Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

NHS (and other public sector)- PFI's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22 September 2011, 07:57 PM
  #1  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default NHS (and other public sector)- PFI's

Private Finance Initiatives - more disasters from the last Labour government coming to fruition. We as the taxpayer are liable to a staggering amount of money, and for some reason it does not get included in the yearly deficit!

What I cannot understand is why effectively borrow from the private sector to get projects paid for, when the government can borrow cheaper by selling bonds?

Even assuming that the private sector got things done cheaper (which is a very dubious assumption), this is looking a stupidly expensive way of doing business, but it is of course 'off the books' so looks good.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/he...-go-wrong.html

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/da...-more-of-them/

The price tag for repaying PFI firms will reach £8.6 billion next year alone, with the taxpayer owing a total of £121.4 billion on public projects which are worth only £52.9 billion.
Many PFI deals tie local authorities into expensive catering, cleaning and maintenance contracts, meaning the total bill to the taxpayer is £229 billion.
A hospital in Bromley, south London, which will cost the NHS £1.2billion, more than 10 times what it is worth.
An almost unknown City company, Innisfree, with only 14 staff, is the largest single player in the PFI market, owning or co-owning 269 PFI schools and 28 hospitals.



According to accounts filed at Companies House, Innisfree’s profit margin was 53 per cent last year. A successful FTSE 100 company makes margins of around 6 per cent. David Metter, the founder and chief executive of Innisfree, owns almost three-quarters of the company and collected pay and dividends of £8.6 million last year.
Old 22 September 2011, 08:08 PM
  #2  
Midlife......
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Midlife......'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 11,583
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Last time the figures were released the planned marginal increase was 2.8% in costs for a PFI.........good news was that hospitals were built, and built on time. Downside is the contracts that tie in the costs. For example our car park made a shortfall one year of £70,000 and the NHS had to stump up the difference, and then the phones, TV etc. Ludicrous

Shaun
Old 22 September 2011, 08:11 PM
  #3  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Midlife......
Last time the figures were released the planned marginal increase was 2.8% in costs for a PFI.........good news was that hospitals were built, and built on time. Downside is the contracts that tie in the costs. For example our car park made a shortfall one year of £70,000 and the NHS had to stump up the difference, and then the phones, TV etc. Ludicrous

Shaun
2.8% in absolute terms, or per year? Do you have figures for that?

How are the PFI's taking on debt or issuing equity so cheap?
Old 22 September 2011, 08:40 PM
  #4  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
Private Finance Initiatives - more disasters from the last Labour government coming to fruition. [/URL]

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/da...-more-of-them/
but a financial instrument initially devised by the conservative in the late 80’s early 90’s
Old 22 September 2011, 08:47 PM
  #5  
Midlife......
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Midlife......'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 11,583
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

TdW

http://www.healthinvestor.co.uk/(X(1...s.aspx?ID=1828

Paragraph 4 .....

Shaun
Old 22 September 2011, 08:55 PM
  #6  
rossyboy
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
rossyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Flying the Flag for the GC8A
Posts: 4,194
Received 94 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
for some reason it does not get included in the yearly deficit!

What I cannot understand is why effectively borrow from the private sector to get projects paid for, when the government can borrow cheaper by selling bonds?
You've kind of answered your own question. PFI is opted for because it doesn't have to be included in the overall "headline" debt of the country (not the annual deficit bit). If the govt sold bonds to fund all the building projects, it would be included - Therefore total debt compared to annual GDP increases.

Bit of a fudge really.
Old 22 September 2011, 09:38 PM
  #7  
David Lock
Scooby Regular
 
David Lock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Giving the cost over a 20-25 year period is a great Daily Mail headline but a tiny proportion of total NHS spend over the same period.

If you want to have a go at wastage I would start with MoD.

And I would say chop planned white elephants like Trident and the get-to-Birmingham-20-mins-quicker rail link (but they're other issues).

dl

Trending Topics

Old 22 September 2011, 09:46 PM
  #8  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That article says that the PFI cost is twice that of normal government borrowing.
Old 23 September 2011, 07:20 AM
  #9  
_Meridian_
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
_Meridian_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mancs
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
Private Finance Initiatives - more disasters from the last Labour government coming to fruition.


Invented, of course, by the last Tory government, of John Major. You'll notice that the Tories are happy to criticise individual schemes, and for exactly the reasons the Major government was told they were a bad idea, but they won't say that they will never set up any more. The appearance of something for nothing is just too good for politicians to resist.

M
Old 23 September 2011, 03:15 PM
  #10  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Seems to me that it will cost a lot of money over the years and it will be for our descendants to pay back of course. They will love us!

Les
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jason b
ScoobyNet General
19
04 June 2001 09:55 AM
ex-webby
ScoobyNet General
11
22 May 2001 12:04 PM
Blow Dog
ScoobyNet General
9
07 December 2000 06:38 PM
Bright Kar
ScoobyNet General
49
18 September 2000 12:55 PM



Quick Reply: NHS (and other public sector)- PFI's



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:02 AM.