Thank God for IVF
09 August 2011, 11:21 AM
#1
Thank God for IVF
What a heart warming story.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/baby-f...-1226111503642
What I don't get is the need for IVF - surely at least one of these two was fertile?
Are we supposed to read between the lines and assume that none of their circle of acquaintances could perform the honours?
Perhaps there are some on here who could have helped out and saved the Australian health system a few bob?
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/baby-f...-1226111503642
What I don't get is the need for IVF - surely at least one of these two was fertile?
Are we supposed to read between the lines and assume that none of their circle of acquaintances could perform the honours?
Perhaps there are some on here who could have helped out and saved the Australian health system a few bob?
09 August 2011, 12:27 PM
#2
Scooby Regular
What a heart warming story.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/baby-f...-1226111503642
What I don't get is the need for IVF - surely at least one of these two was fertile?
Are we supposed to read between the lines and assume that none of their circle of acquaintances could perform the honours?
Perhaps there are some on here who could have helped out and saved the Australian health system a few bob?
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/baby-f...-1226111503642
What I don't get is the need for IVF - surely at least one of these two was fertile?
Are we supposed to read between the lines and assume that none of their circle of acquaintances could perform the honours?
Perhaps there are some on here who could have helped out and saved the Australian health system a few bob?
Is it the gay bit, or the IVF bit that stirs you so much?
Last edited by Hysteria1983; 09 August 2011 at 12:29 PM.
09 August 2011, 01:53 PM
#3
And their plea for privacy.
You are quite correct to say this has happened before. A derivative of it pretty much "supports" the Welfare state in this country.
09 August 2011, 01:57 PM
#4
What a heart warming story.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/baby-f...-1226111503642
What I don't get is the need for IVF - surely at least one of these two was fertile?
Are we supposed to read between the lines and assume that none of their circle of acquaintances could perform the honours?
Perhaps there are some on here who could have helped out and saved the Australian health system a few bob?
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/baby-f...-1226111503642
What I don't get is the need for IVF - surely at least one of these two was fertile?
Are we supposed to read between the lines and assume that none of their circle of acquaintances could perform the honours?
Perhaps there are some on here who could have helped out and saved the Australian health system a few bob?
09 August 2011, 05:25 PM
#5
To be fair, it is possible that either
a) they may have had it done privately (good old labour double standards) or
b) they are pretending it was done with IVF (to imply their chaste reputation?)
Out of interest, I wonder if the scientists who came up with the technology considered how this technology might be used.
In view of the obviously unnatural methodology used to mimic a natural occurrence, I would have to assume that they did make such a consideration.
a) they may have had it done privately (good old labour double standards) or
b) they are pretending it was done with IVF (to imply their chaste reputation?)
Out of interest, I wonder if the scientists who came up with the technology considered how this technology might be used.
In view of the obviously unnatural methodology used to mimic a natural occurrence, I would have to assume that they did make such a consideration.
Trending Topics
10 August 2011, 09:03 AM
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To be fair, it is possible that either
a) they may have had it done privately (good old labour double standards) or
b) they are pretending it was done with IVF (to imply their chaste reputation?)
Out of interest, I wonder if the scientists who came up with the technology considered how this technology might be used.
In view of the obviously unnatural methodology used to mimic a natural occurrence, I would have to assume that they did make such a consideration.
a) they may have had it done privately (good old labour double standards) or
b) they are pretending it was done with IVF (to imply their chaste reputation?)
Out of interest, I wonder if the scientists who came up with the technology considered how this technology might be used.
In view of the obviously unnatural methodology used to mimic a natural occurrence, I would have to assume that they did make such a consideration.
Science often goes faster than thinking about ALL of it's repercussions. There have been lots of chages in this field.
Another I can think of is, the use of a dead mans sperm.
Really a non story though, good luck to them. I have a feeling there children will not be rioting in the future.
10 August 2011, 12:51 PM
#11
a) I would think they did, so really not an issue.
Science often goes faster than thinking about ALL of it's repercussions. There have been lots of chages in this field.
Another I can think of is, the use of a dead mans sperm.
Really a non story though, good luck to them. I have a feeling there children will not be rioting in the future.
Science often goes faster than thinking about ALL of it's repercussions. There have been lots of chages in this field.
Another I can think of is, the use of a dead mans sperm.
Really a non story though, good luck to them. I have a feeling there children will not be rioting in the future.
Think of Marlon Brando's line in The Wild One-
Mildred: What're you rebelling against, Johnny?
Johnny: Whaddya got?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lozgti1
Non Scooby Related
7
19 September 2015 09:07 PM
andy97
Computer & Technology Related
12
16 September 2015 08:07 PM
Gridlock Mikey
ScoobyNet General
7
29 May 2001 06:52 PM