Holy cow, petrol 19p a liter!
#1
Holy cow, petrol 19p a liter!
No, not another supermarket price war, but this stuff:
Hang on to your gas-guzzlers, this could get interesting
A British company has invented artificial petrol that emits no greenhouse gases and could cost as little as 19p per litre at the pumps.Cella Energy, the Oxfordshire-based firm that is developing the fuel, uses hydrogen, which is currently much cheaper than oil.
The first road tests of the as yet unnamed fuel are scheduled to take place next year. If everything goes to plan, then the miracle 'petrol' could be available in three to five years.
Though a figure of 19p per litre has been suggested, it is expected that the motorist would pay around 60p per litre with the addition of Government fuel tax.
Even so, that would reduce the price of filling up a 70-litre petrol tank to £42.
http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/31012011/36...lopment-0.html
The first road tests of the as yet unnamed fuel are scheduled to take place next year. If everything goes to plan, then the miracle 'petrol' could be available in three to five years.
Though a figure of 19p per litre has been suggested, it is expected that the motorist would pay around 60p per litre with the addition of Government fuel tax.
Even so, that would reduce the price of filling up a 70-litre petrol tank to £42.
http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/31012011/36...lopment-0.html
#4
Sounds too good to be true, no?
Why would the Govt. NEED to tax it anyway? There is presumably a plentiful supply, so no need to 'restrict' demand and no pollution issues, so it appears to have none of the downsides of petrol today.
No need to tax surely?
Surely this would reduce inflation, 'fuel' (geddit?) demand in other areas of the economy and increase social mobility?
Win win, but oh no, they want to tax it!
Why would the Govt. NEED to tax it anyway? There is presumably a plentiful supply, so no need to 'restrict' demand and no pollution issues, so it appears to have none of the downsides of petrol today.
No need to tax surely?
Surely this would reduce inflation, 'fuel' (geddit?) demand in other areas of the economy and increase social mobility?
Win win, but oh no, they want to tax it!
#5
Scooby Regular
Presumably the price of hydrogen, 'currently cheaper than oil', will rise fairly rapidly if everyone starts to try and use it in this way? I'm pretty sure supplies of hydrogen (produced in an industrial manner) won't be anywhere near as plentiful as supplies of oil, and I also think I read somewhere that there were problems at the moment with actually producing it on that kind of scale - hence the doubts about the hydrogen fuel cells.
But this sounds very promising at least. The future has to be in some kind of synthetic fuel/oil which doesn't require the use of finite natural resources. I'm surprised there isn't something like that already.
But this sounds very promising at least. The future has to be in some kind of synthetic fuel/oil which doesn't require the use of finite natural resources. I'm surprised there isn't something like that already.
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Plenty of H2O about
Problem at the moment is how to transport neat H and stick it in a car as a liquid as it requires a lot of pressure to liquidise it. So effectively you would be driving around with a small bomb in the back.
But it will be the fuel of the future in a few years IMHO. dl
Problem at the moment is how to transport neat H and stick it in a car as a liquid as it requires a lot of pressure to liquidise it. So effectively you would be driving around with a small bomb in the back.
But it will be the fuel of the future in a few years IMHO. dl
Trending Topics
#8
Sounds too good to be true, no?
Why would the Govt. NEED to tax it anyway? There is presumably a plentiful supply, so no need to 'restrict' demand and no pollution issues, so it appears to have none of the downsides of petrol today.
No need to tax surely?
Surely this would reduce inflation, 'fuel' (geddit?) demand in other areas of the economy and increase social mobility?
Win win, but oh no, they want to tax it!
Why would the Govt. NEED to tax it anyway? There is presumably a plentiful supply, so no need to 'restrict' demand and no pollution issues, so it appears to have none of the downsides of petrol today.
No need to tax surely?
Surely this would reduce inflation, 'fuel' (geddit?) demand in other areas of the economy and increase social mobility?
Win win, but oh no, they want to tax it!
#9
Scooby Regular
Plenty of H2O about
Problem at the moment is how to transport neat H and stick it in a car as a liquid as it requires a lot of pressure to liquidise it. So effectively you would be driving around with a small bomb in the back.
But it will be the fuel of the future in a few years IMHO. dl
Problem at the moment is how to transport neat H and stick it in a car as a liquid as it requires a lot of pressure to liquidise it. So effectively you would be driving around with a small bomb in the back.
But it will be the fuel of the future in a few years IMHO. dl
Last edited by GlesgaKiss; 31 January 2011 at 09:10 PM.
#11
Plenty of H2O about
Problem at the moment is how to transport neat H and stick it in a car as a liquid as it requires a lot of pressure to liquidise it. So effectively you would be driving around with a small bomb in the back.
But it will be the fuel of the future in a few years IMHO. dl
Problem at the moment is how to transport neat H and stick it in a car as a liquid as it requires a lot of pressure to liquidise it. So effectively you would be driving around with a small bomb in the back.
But it will be the fuel of the future in a few years IMHO. dl
Whilst hydrogen is the most abundant element it is "locked up" with other elements. Does this 19p also cover the cost of extracting the hydrogen both financially and environmentally? We don't know at the moment. But this technology sounds promising!
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bring back infractions!
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#15
Would have thought these things could go viral through the net if they actually work and people are now p1ssed off enough to take notice of any potentially thing that may alleviate transport costs, personally I dont want to just exist because everything has gone up substantially apart from my salary.
If people want this to happen, it can, my doubt comes from the fact it probably doesnt work. It would be wonderful to see that happen, would shift the balance of power in the world massively, cannot begin to imagine the ramifications, would love to see all the oil sheikhs and Oligarchs get fooked over, buying fleets of Mercs, each in a colour of the rainbow and a personal A380 is obscene and acheived by keeping up over a barrel (litterally).
#16
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Until fusion power is up and running how do we manufacture the Hydrogen gas in the first place ?
Solar farms in the dessert to make the Arabs even richer ?
dunx
P.S. After tax it will be a "green-fingers width" less than petrol.
Solar farms in the dessert to make the Arabs even richer ?
dunx
P.S. After tax it will be a "green-fingers width" less than petrol.
#20
Agreed the govt would no doubt try their damndest to ruin it for everyone by taxing or regulating it to death, but at least this time it would be utterly transparent that they didn't have the slightest excuse to - it gives off no carbon or any other (real) pollution, it has no negative effect at all on our balance of trade deficit, and on top of that it would have the positive benefits of providing a massive boost to a native industry, and saving an absolute fortune in time and money in not having to re-adapt our entire transport infrastructure to using new forms of vehicles if/when hydrocarbon-based fuels run out.
If it really does work the way they're saying it will here, it would be nothing short of a complete game-changer.
#21
The Government will find a way. Since the only emissions would be water vapour and water vapour is many times more potent as a greenhouse, they will levy a tax to kerb its use!
#22
...of course, water will place an additional strain on road drainage and increase the risk of road damage through ice in the winter months
#25
#26
Scooby Regular
...saying that they'll probably just throw it all away by giving it to the benefit system or something like that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post