Shoesmith loses her appeal for unfair dismissal.
23 April 2010, 12:25 PM
#4
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Haha sod!
Yeah I am shocked she had the front to too. Apparently she is allowed to appeal the decision.
Apparently the case was not based on the decision, but how the decision was made. aka a waste of time.
Yeah I am shocked she had the front to too. Apparently she is allowed to appeal the decision.
Apparently the case was not based on the decision, but how the decision was made. aka a waste of time.
23 April 2010, 12:37 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sure there's legalities involved, however, at the very basic level she was responsible for the safety of children and a child died the most horrific death possible on her watch, so the bottom line is (in the words of Alan Sugar)....Sharon - you're fired!!!
23 April 2010, 01:22 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is very rare that we have seen someone being held responsible for the gross errors of a department which they were in charge of.
About time there was a lot more of "The buck stops here", it might just concentrate the minds of a few more who expect to never have to accept any blame for their failures.
Les
About time there was a lot more of "The buck stops here", it might just concentrate the minds of a few more who expect to never have to accept any blame for their failures.
Les
23 April 2010, 01:23 PM
#7
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Awesome, although she still wasted taxpayers money (?) by trying it on 
TX.
Edit - reading about it on BBC website, it sounds like she didn't put her case together very well ...
TX.
Edit - reading about it on BBC website, it sounds like she didn't put her case together very well ...
Last edited by Terminator X; 23 April 2010 at 01:27 PM.
Trending Topics
24 April 2010, 11:55 AM
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and rest
Last edited by The Zohan; 24 April 2010 at 11:58 AM.
24 April 2010, 02:52 PM
#13
But no-one hold their breath for her to win it on appeal..........
I'm not sure what it is with the UK: we appeal, we lose, we appeal the appeal, we lose, we appeal again........Fek off, you lost, get over it.
Same as these friggin so-called asylum seekers. Lose? Get gone.
I'm not sure what it is with the UK: we appeal, we lose, we appeal the appeal, we lose, we appeal again........Fek off, you lost, get over it.
Same as these friggin so-called asylum seekers. Lose? Get gone.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StueyBII
ScoobyNet General
3
18 September 2015 12:34 PM
andy97
Computer & Technology Related
12
16 September 2015 08:07 PM
