boxst

Not really my thing, although some of the things on sites like rotten would probably fall foul to this: Extreme **** law goes live next week - are you ready? ? The Register

Steve

Odds on

**Tam places sledge hammer next to hard drive, just in case they come knocking**

GC8

Its not my cup of tea, but even vicars should be worried as we take another step towards New Labours Orwelian dream.....

Remember: Big Brother Loves You.

Tam the bam

Not at all dude, I'm not a big fan of hardcore ****, I just like looking at naked ladies as I find the female form beautiful, I don't like seeing ******* as they are a total turn off for me, there are plenty pics of lovely ladies on my pc but no hardcore shoite

phil_wrx

iTrader: (2)

best comment

There are two defences to a charge under this act: that you were participating with a consenting partner in the scenes depicted (and no law was broken in the creation of those scenes), or that the scenes exist wholly within a BBFC rated film (DVD, video, etc.). Both these defences have their flaws. The first does not apply to the person taking the photo - unless they were also participating in the act. Since the law will apply on an image by image basis that probably means that you must include some (identifiable) part of your anatomy in every shot


im off to get a tattoo on my big fella so it can be identified

rr_ww

Judging from your selections I disagree

phil_wrx

iTrader: (2)

well im just gonna photoshop my love pole in all my dirty pics then im in each pic so i am not liable

Odds on

I was only jesting mate. The TtB computer is no doubt all good.










ps, cheers for the emails earlier, now I've got to destroy my hard drive as well.

TelBoy

George Orwell was only wrong by 25 years...

Lee247

What the Government deems to be **** and what someone else does are two different things.

I am not remotely interested in ****, I have far better things to do. But, at the end of the day, what the hell has it got to do with this Government what people do. It is now beyond a joke

They will be wanting cameras in our bedrooms next, just in case any of us are into kinky sex.

phil_wrx

iTrader: (2)

dont know about the goverment but i wouldnt mind cameras in ur bedroom

TelBoy

Don't like your put-down of **** there, Lesley. Many, many women ARE into **** and i'm sure they wouldn't look upon that interest as being borne out of having "nothing better to do"...

Tam the bam

Sorry to disappoint you but there is no way I'm doing a gahyer of the week thread, if yo want boy pics then go find them yourself

Lee247

Fair comment, but it is something I am not interested in. Was not trying to put down people who are interested.

I was trying to say, WTF has it got to do with the Government!!!

TelBoy

I agree entirely. But then not everybody subjected to such material can restrain themselves (pardon the pun) from seeking out their fantasies on unwilling victims. As ever it's the stupid who spoil it for the responsible.

GlesgaKiss

**** = people having sex.

Since this is sort of the reason we are here, I don't see why we all have to be sheltered from it.

Lee247

Lee247

I have no idea what you mean

rr_ww

Good point. We can ever more graphic, gory, violent films but a little mclovin is not allowed.

Tells me that 90% of the cabinet aren't getting any at home, so why should anybody else

GlesgaKiss

Many women also like having their hair pulled. Is that classed as extreme/violent?

Will

i was so dissapointed after opening this thread


have not had a proper look at the link, but what if a maried couple enjoy hardcore sex with each other and have pictures of their events on their computer, will that be illegal???

boxst

I'm sorry -- not up to the usual posting of women!

Basically extreme violence for sexual gratification. So it depends what that married couple get up to.

Steve

GlesgaKiss

That's quite strange in my opinion. But that's all it is - an opinion.

Who is a sex starved middle aged politician to tell you what you can and can't look at?

If I came across something like that, then I would simply close it and not look at it. Not my cup of tea, but I'm hardly going to be scarred for life and traumatised.

Although I agree, kids should be kept from seeing anything like that at all costs.

Saying that, I think sex education in schools is terrible. I can honestly say that I didn't take in one single piece of information about sex or relationsips from the lessons I had. I also don't think totally sheltering kids is a good idea either. What harm does it do to have them knowing how things are? Sheltering is more likely to cause them to behave in strange ways later in life, probably resulting in extreme/violent sexual interests later in life. So I think the do gooders aren't doing much good at all. As usual.

Tam the bam

Says you! btw please don't send me any of that conjoined dwarf **** again, I know you like it but it does nowt for me. TIA

SwissTony

iTrader: (19)

I think the easiest way to find the **** pervs is just to look at when some of these people are posting at certain late night/early morning sessions.




* check out Tam's post above *

Tam the bam

I posted that at 10 pm, not my fault SN was so slow it took till 1.14 to show

r32

Doesnt seem as though the definition is very clear. Page 3?

More labour big brother, deciding what we can watch or do. Its all for our own good of course, as we are not capable of making simple decisions.