Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Rewriting history: the Duke.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11 May 2008, 11:35 AM
  #1  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Thumbs down Rewriting history: the Duke.

Apparently, ITV are to screen a new documentary which portrays the Duke of Edinburgh as an ecologist!

He is said to sound off about overpopulation and conservation.

I sincerely hope that they remember to ask him why he had FOUR children when the national average was 2.4, and how much he believed in conservation when he was shooting deer, grouse, pheasants etc etc.

What a complete apologist crock.

Producer looking for a knighthood?

Alcazar
Old 11 May 2008, 12:04 PM
  #2  
Prasius
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Prasius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What has game shooting got to do with NOT being a conservationist?

Pheasants, Deer, and every other game animal shot/hunted/fished in the UK are not endangered; while many of the plants and native species of animals that enjoy the habitat provided by managed game areas are.

Plus nothing tastes as good as a pheasant or bit of venison you've shot yourself.

(Prasius - paid up full member of the Countryside Alliance)
Old 11 May 2008, 12:16 PM
  #3  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Good argument mate: conserve animals by killing them

THEN add that you're part of the countryside alliance.......and?

Alcazar
Old 11 May 2008, 02:27 PM
  #4  
warrenm2
Scooby Regular
 
warrenm2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

controlling populations by hunting has a double benefit actually - firstly the land does not get over grazed and hence food is of good quality and in good supply - hence healthier and less stressed animals. Secondly the fees from hunting fund proper management and upkeep of the area, treatment of sick animals etc.

So in answer to your patronising "conserve animals by killing them" - the answer is yes
Old 11 May 2008, 03:22 PM
  #5  
dsmith
Scooby Regular
 
dsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 4,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"Good argument mate: conserve animals by killing them"

Oh dear. Really cant get past Sun headlines can you ?
Old 11 May 2008, 04:07 PM
  #6  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dsmith
"Good argument mate: conserve animals by killing them"

Oh dear. Really cant get past Sun headlines can you ?
Has everyone gone mad? The WHOLE thrust of my original post has been lost by folk supporting hunting in the UK. Forget hunting in the UK, call it what you will, you can't conserve stuff by wiping them out.

The guy is NOT a conservationist, he's hunted "game" abroad, too, and he's NOT going to be able to preach overpopulation when his own family is as large as it is.

One rule for them?

Alcazar
Old 11 May 2008, 04:10 PM
  #7  
GC8
Scooby Regular
 
GC8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jeff, he could give you a kidney and you still wouldnt like him. Perhaps this tempers your judgement?
Old 11 May 2008, 04:58 PM
  #8  
Prasius
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Prasius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just hope your a vegetarian.

Maybe everyone else is defending hunting because thats the main thrust of your dislike of him. Oh, and as for him having four kids - I'm not sure - but I'm pretty sure him and the misses haven't claimed Child Benefit. Which is more than most people with one kid can say.
Old 11 May 2008, 10:09 PM
  #9  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GC8
Jeff, he could give you a kidney and you still wouldnt like him. Perhaps this tempers your judgement?
But I DON'T dislike the guy, I actually find him quite amusing.

What I can't get my head around is ITV trying to make out he's what he's not.

FFS: everyone knows EXACTLY what he is, so why lie?

Alcazar
Old 11 May 2008, 10:13 PM
  #10  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by Prasius
I just hope your a vegetarian.

Maybe everyone else is defending hunting because thats the main thrust of your dislike of him. Oh, and as for him having four kids - I'm not sure - but I'm pretty sure him and the misses haven't claimed Child Benefit. Which is more than most people with one kid can say.
Firstly, why do I need be a veggie? I'm sure that's not relevant to anything, after all, ITV aren't making a docu about ME being a conservationist, nor have I ever claimed to be one

Secondly, of course Queenie and Chookie haven't claimed any benefit. Why would they need to with their HUGE personal fortunes and pay off the civil list? Oh, and isn't that TOTALLY living off the country, so a kind of benefit available only to a very few

Alcazar
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
some cook
Subaru
24
23 December 2015 09:27 AM
Doc
Computer & Technology Related
24
14 March 2011 10:06 PM
jbryant
Computer & Technology Related
7
22 May 2004 08:50 PM



Quick Reply: Rewriting history: the Duke.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:05 PM.