Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Eco hypocritic pratts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14 February 2008, 06:52 PM
  #1  
robby
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
robby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,127
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Eco hypocritic pratts

heard on the news today that the uk are planning a moon landing in the next few years.
Now i thought the government were wanting to stop high emmissions by over taxing everyone so why is it they're sending rockets up when they spew out tens of thousands of gallons of aviation fuel (which is more harmful than unleaded) and this is acceptable?
Are they wanting to put up speed cameras on the moon and parking meters before the multi millionaires decide to have their own rockets built so they can escape our great land
Old 14 February 2008, 07:05 PM
  #2  
Chelspeed
Scooby Regular
 
Chelspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rocket fuel is not aviation fuel it's liquid oxygen (aka LOX) and hydrogen peroxide. Burn hydrogen and oxygen and you get an exhaust which is...... water. So no big deal.
Old 14 February 2008, 07:23 PM
  #3  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by robby
heard on the news today that the uk are planning a moon landing in the next few years.
Now i thought the government were wanting to stop high emmissions by over taxing everyone so why is it they're sending rockets up when they spew out tens of thousands of gallons of aviation fuel (which is more harmful than unleaded) and this is acceptable?
Are they wanting to put up speed cameras on the moon and parking meters before the multi millionaires decide to have their own rockets built so they can escape our great land
This is a very slightly odd thread, but I like that kind

Even if a rocket produced CO2 it would account 0.000000000001% (that's an educated guess ) of the CO2 this country produces.

If you want to debate global warming then fine let's do it, but please don't use stuff like this as an excuse for bashing the whole arguement, and use conspriracy theories (moon landings and conspiracy theories, that can't be right ) to justify why we should do nothing (assuming that's what you meant).
Old 14 February 2008, 07:41 PM
  #4  
Luminous
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Luminous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Muppetising life
Posts: 15,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

More to the point is the cost. They were saying that as a minimum it would cost £25m per person just to get them into orbit.

Actually, thinking about it, that is a small price to pay to get rid of Brown. No body, no crime. Anyone for starting a collection?
Old 14 February 2008, 07:48 PM
  #5  
robby
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
robby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,127
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
If you want to debate global warming then fine let's do it, but please don't use stuff like this as an excuse for bashing the whole arguement, and use conspriracy theories (moon landings and conspiracy theories, that can't be right ) to justify why we should do nothing (assuming that's what you meant).
what i was trying to say was why are we taxpayers who are being urged to leave our cars at home expected to fork out for expensive space exploration (sp) - ok so it's not aviation fuel used (my mistake) but there will still be all the debris left floating in space.

why does brown want to land on the moon when he can't even sort out this planet?
Old 14 February 2008, 08:51 PM
  #6  
Hoppy
Scooby Regular
 
Hoppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Where age and treachery reins over youthful exuberance
Posts: 5,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd like to know what practical benefits all the bi££ions spent on space exploration has yielded so far. Apart from some pretty pictures of earth, and some very dull ones of distant planets that some bearded loon has generated on their computer
Old 14 February 2008, 09:11 PM
  #7  
Luminous
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Luminous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Muppetising life
Posts: 15,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by robby
why does brown want to land on the moon when he can't even sort out this planet?
Tony Blair is conquering Europe and Brown does not want to be outdone, thats why Just image the PR stunt for the first politician on the moon
Old 14 February 2008, 09:12 PM
  #8  
Clarebabes
Scooby Regular
 
Clarebabes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A big town with sh1t shops: Northampton
Posts: 21,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Would you really trust this Government with your life in something they've built?
Old 14 February 2008, 09:13 PM
  #9  
girl-in-a-scoob
Scooby Regular
 
girl-in-a-scoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Y.S.O.C. - NORTH YORKSHIRE SUBARU OWNERS CLUB
Posts: 9,914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[quote=Clarebabes;7654308]Would you really trust this Government with your life in something they've built? [/quote

Nope
Old 14 February 2008, 09:24 PM
  #10  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by robby
what i was trying to say was why are we taxpayers who are being urged to leave our cars at home expected to fork out for expensive space exploration (sp) - ok so it's not aviation fuel used (my mistake) but there will still be all the debris left floating in space.

why does brown want to land on the moon when he can't even sort out this planet?
Should we also stop evolving as well?

We should never stop exploring and pushing the boundries, it's what we do, and incidentally we've learnt much about how this planet works through various space programmes.

Why are you trying to turn this into a political issue when it isn't, the overwelming majority of the UK space programme is funded privately.
Old 15 February 2008, 12:41 AM
  #11  
Klaatu
Scooby Regular
 
Klaatu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chelspeed
Rocket fuel is not aviation fuel it's liquid oxygen (aka LOX) and hydrogen peroxide. Burn hydrogen and oxygen and you get an exhaust which is...... water. So no big deal.
Water vapour IS a problem.
Old 15 February 2008, 09:19 AM
  #12  
SJ_Skyline
Scooby Senior
 
SJ_Skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Limbo
Posts: 21,922
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

£25M per person? What's the point? It's cheaper to just fly in Branston's speaceship
Old 15 February 2008, 03:17 PM
  #13  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We are told that water vapour is appreciably more capable of causing global warming than CO2!

Les
Old 15 February 2008, 04:07 PM
  #14  
Fuzz
Scooby Regular
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under your bonnet
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What ever the band wagon you want to put it on we really aught to stop raping this planet of it's resources or there will be nothing left to resource.

If we don't learn this soon we'll be up **** creek without a paddle !

At the end of the day, we can all "do our bit" by using less of everything but our hands are pretty much tied..

It's not the general public that need to be building "things" that produce clean energy in the first place!!

Unless the government get with the program and start funding such schemes we may as well **** into the wind, for all the difference it's going to make!


Andy
Old 15 February 2008, 05:47 PM
  #15  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fuzz
What ever the band wagon you want to put it on we really aught to stop raping this planet of it's resources or there will be nothing left to resource.

If we don't learn this soon we'll be up **** creek without a paddle !

At the end of the day, we can all "do our bit" by using less of everything but our hands are pretty much tied..

It's not the general public that need to be building "things" that produce clean energy in the first place!!

Unless the government get with the program and start funding such schemes we may as well **** into the wind, for all the difference it's going to make!


Andy
Thats good sense.

Les
Old 15 February 2008, 08:41 PM
  #16  
robby
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
robby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,127
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

another thing on radio2 today the money guy came on and it was mentioned on his money saving website it shows where you can book a flight to ireland for £1 ?????????????? hey cmon, so it's now cheaper to fly to Ireland than it is to drive a mile down the road
Old 15 February 2008, 08:53 PM
  #17  
Fuzz
Scooby Regular
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under your bonnet
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's called a loss leader and it has sweet FA to do with ecology
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
33
29 August 2017 07:18 PM
Jamo
ScoobyNet General
1
03 May 2004 11:09 AM
J4CKO
Non Scooby Related
11
13 February 2004 09:42 PM
UHF
Was it you?
2
09 February 2004 06:45 AM



Quick Reply: Eco hypocritic pratts



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 AM.