Why is the governement taxing the rail system?
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Muppetising life
Posts: 15,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why is the governement taxing the rail system?
Maybe I heard this wrong, but National Express just paid the government £1.4 BILLION pounds for the right to operate the old GNER train routes.
Oh, and then they announce fairs are going to go up
Any other government would want a train service to be well run, whats the point in sucking £1.4b out of company that is going to try and run them for you. Like that is going to make fairs lower, and encourage investment
Oh, and then they announce fairs are going to go up
Any other government would want a train service to be well run, whats the point in sucking £1.4b out of company that is going to try and run them for you. Like that is going to make fairs lower, and encourage investment
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With talk like that you will be nationalising the rail sector next.
Oh, we already tried and failed at that
Conversely - why should I, the tax payer, pay to subsidise the rail service. I enjoyed the benefits of selling mobile cellular licenses so why not enjoy the benefits of selling the rail network licenses?
Oh, we already tried and failed at that
Conversely - why should I, the tax payer, pay to subsidise the rail service. I enjoyed the benefits of selling mobile cellular licenses so why not enjoy the benefits of selling the rail network licenses?
#3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Muppetising life
Posts: 15,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, just looked up a little more info....the government are spinning this as a great deal for the taxpayer as.......wait for it................................
They are going to spend £7.4m to upgrade stations and 400k on environment issues.
I wonder why that investment could seems really small...ah yes, its the fact that the gov just took £1.4b for the right to run trains to 2015
They are going to spend £7.4m to upgrade stations and 400k on environment issues.
I wonder why that investment could seems really small...ah yes, its the fact that the gov just took £1.4b for the right to run trains to 2015
#4
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Muppetising life
Posts: 15,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With talk like that you will be nationalising the rail sector next.
Oh, we already tried and failed at that
Conversely - why should I, the tax payer, pay to subsidise the rail service. I enjoyed the benefits of selling mobile cellular licenses so why not enjoy the benefits of selling the rail network licenses?
Oh, we already tried and failed at that
Conversely - why should I, the tax payer, pay to subsidise the rail service. I enjoyed the benefits of selling mobile cellular licenses so why not enjoy the benefits of selling the rail network licenses?
a) you pay a fair amount for your travel
b) you pay for a company to make a profit
c) you pay a massive tax to the gov for the licence
Thats just not a good deal for us. If you want it privatized, at least don't rob the companies that do this blind, so that in turn travel costs are extortionate.
#5
Are the fairs going to be at the stations, so we can use them while we wait for the train?
#7
It is absolute nonsense and I'm surprised the green lobby dont give them a harder time.
It is clear to me that the reason I drive to London is that it is cheaper than taking the train (£110 2nd class return from Cardiff - unless you book it during a full moon, a week in advance, and have a surname that ends in a 'z'...).
They purposefully price people OFF the trains due to over crowding/insufficient service at peak times. I would honestly prefer to get the coffee and laptop out and get some work done, bit NOT at £110 a ticket!!!
RYAN AIR lets be havin' you on the ground PLEASE!!!
D
It is clear to me that the reason I drive to London is that it is cheaper than taking the train (£110 2nd class return from Cardiff - unless you book it during a full moon, a week in advance, and have a surname that ends in a 'z'...).
They purposefully price people OFF the trains due to over crowding/insufficient service at peak times. I would honestly prefer to get the coffee and laptop out and get some work done, bit NOT at £110 a ticket!!!
RYAN AIR lets be havin' you on the ground PLEASE!!!
D
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Luminous
The way I see it is that when you board a train
a) you pay a fair amount for your travel
b) you pay for a company to make a profit
c) you pay a massive tax to the gov for the licence
Thats just not a good deal for us. If you want it privatized, at least don't rob the companies that do this blind, so that in turn travel costs are extortionate.
a) you pay a fair amount for your travel
b) you pay for a company to make a profit
c) you pay a massive tax to the gov for the licence
Thats just not a good deal for us. If you want it privatized, at least don't rob the companies that do this blind, so that in turn travel costs are extortionate.
We should model our corporate governance and taxation on the PE sector where the average growth of the major PE syndicates is measured in billions and they pay a very fair amount of tax.
Nothing.
Seems like the right call to me as it encourages growth and fair competition and no individual could ever be concerned that there was any government interference in the fair price that they pay for their goods and services.
#9
Scooby Regular
Let me get this straight - you are complaining that the Government are charging companies rather than paying them taxpayers money ....... AND YOU ARE CRYING ABOUT IT?????
#10
It was once called PUBLIC transport R. Thought that concept was coming back in vogue due to environmental concerns - let alone quality of life?
20p on a bus in Norway from one end of Oslo to the other. You'd need a mortgage in this isle to do the same. It should not all be about the dollar or boardroom bonuses in ALL things. Some things are basics and the irony is that most 'non basic' travel costs whips their ***** on price...cheaper to fly to Greece than get a train to London FFS!
D
20p on a bus in Norway from one end of Oslo to the other. You'd need a mortgage in this isle to do the same. It should not all be about the dollar or boardroom bonuses in ALL things. Some things are basics and the irony is that most 'non basic' travel costs whips their ***** on price...cheaper to fly to Greece than get a train to London FFS!
D
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Been doing some research on the real figures...
Forecast of 20m passenger journeys per year for the remainder of the franchise. That is 140m journeys. So this works out at £10 per ticket.
The average price of a GNER train from Newcastle to London is £90, the average for easyJET is £100 (government figures) and the flight then will cost even more to get to the centre of London.
Average fares for all GNER journeys is around £45 and the average first class fare is around £250.
I personally travel on average twice a week paying full first class ticket to I must be massively subsidising the average ticket loading in terms of license fee. Advance tickets are freely available after 8.40am and I use them if the timing is convenient - usually pay between 30-50% of the full fare.
Seems pretty good to me
PS As tickets do not attract VAT there is a strange coincidence that the average license premium is about the same level as VAT would be
Forecast of 20m passenger journeys per year for the remainder of the franchise. That is 140m journeys. So this works out at £10 per ticket.
The average price of a GNER train from Newcastle to London is £90, the average for easyJET is £100 (government figures) and the flight then will cost even more to get to the centre of London.
Average fares for all GNER journeys is around £45 and the average first class fare is around £250.
I personally travel on average twice a week paying full first class ticket to I must be massively subsidising the average ticket loading in terms of license fee. Advance tickets are freely available after 8.40am and I use them if the timing is convenient - usually pay between 30-50% of the full fare.
Seems pretty good to me
PS As tickets do not attract VAT there is a strange coincidence that the average license premium is about the same level as VAT would be
#15
Because the taxpayer will eventually have to pay the steep rail fares demanded so it is effectively another stealth tax.
When the railways were nationalised the taxpayer subsidised them directly at a cheaper price then now when the authorities and the private investors make extra profit out of us.
Les
When the railways were nationalised the taxpayer subsidised them directly at a cheaper price then now when the authorities and the private investors make extra profit out of us.
Les
Last edited by Leslie; 15 August 2007 at 01:08 PM.
#17
R, I take it your company actually pays, and not you? So benevolent!!!
My 'global' experience is that our public transport i VASTLY inefficient and overpriced - even when fares aree tax deductible!!! Third world countries have better and more accesible services - honestl So please, could do better/cheaper attitude is very appropriate, whatever your daily rate.
D
My 'global' experience is that our public transport i VASTLY inefficient and overpriced - even when fares aree tax deductible!!! Third world countries have better and more accesible services - honestl So please, could do better/cheaper attitude is very appropriate, whatever your daily rate.
D
#18
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
R, I take it your company actually pays, and not you? So benevolent!!!
My 'global' experience is that our public transport i VASTLY inefficient and overpriced - even when fares aree tax deductible!!! Third world countries have better and more accesible services - honestl So please, could do better/cheaper attitude is very appropriate, whatever your daily rate.
D
My 'global' experience is that our public transport i VASTLY inefficient and overpriced - even when fares aree tax deductible!!! Third world countries have better and more accesible services - honestl So please, could do better/cheaper attitude is very appropriate, whatever your daily rate.
D
I have travelled in many countries and I agree we could do better. However there are not that many third world countries that have better services, unless you call sitting on the roof better, because if you sit inside you have a goat for company in the next seat.
BTW - for me to fly costs considerably more unless I get the late morning flight and the last flight home. Then I have to put up with Heathrow which is now a complete mess, especially British Airways.
#21
I never was sure about the logic of privatisation of sectors that rely primarily on infrastructure which was funded by taxpayers in the past - for example railways, hydro electric, water etc.
#22
Your sarcasm is misplaced Rannoch, and it does you no favours!
Les
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
crazyspeedfreakz
Wanted
17
05 October 2015 07:19 PM