Private equity firms...what are they all about?
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Private equity firms...what are they all about?
EMI is a music company with experienced people who know about running a music company. They have just been bought out by a private equity firm who probably have little experience in running a music company. What makes them think they can do a better job. Its not like VW buying out Skoda where they can share technology,experience and parts therefore use that to run Skoda better and also benefit from economies of scale.
I'm no economist but what are private equity firms all about. In my mind there's no logic?
I'm no economist but what are private equity firms all about. In my mind there's no logic?
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SE15/EC4
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EMI is a music company with experienced people who know about running a music company. They have just been bought out by a private equity firm who probably have little experience in running a music company. What makes them think they can do a better job. Its not like VW buying out Skoda where they can share technology,experience and parts therefore use that to run Skoda better and also benefit from economies of scale.
I'm no economist but what are private equity firms all about. In my mind there's no logic?
I'm no economist but what are private equity firms all about. In my mind there's no logic?
PE firms have been doing this for years and years. It's not really any different from the massive conglomerates that used to be popular, except that PE firms are required to generate higher returns and have more flexibility in the way they run a firm, because they take them private.
It's just a very pure form of capitalism. Their investors benefit - pension funds and insurers, largely. They also make shedloads themselves, and agreed a beneficial tax regime with the Revenue back in 1987, so a lot of their income is not taxed in the usual way. That's galling, but it was the Revenue that gave it to them.
The track record of private equity firms in "doing a better job" in pure capitalist terms speaks for itself - they make more money for shareholders, and that's why people pay them.
Last edited by Longjing; 21 May 2007 at 06:38 PM.
#4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EMI is a music company with experienced people who know about running a music company. They have just been bought out by a private equity firm who probably have little experience in running a music company. What makes them think they can do a better job. Its not like VW buying out Skoda where they can share technology,experience and parts therefore use that to run Skoda better and also benefit from economies of scale.
I'm no economist but what are private equity firms all about. In my mind there's no logic?
I'm no economist but what are private equity firms all about. In my mind there's no logic?
#5
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EMI executives don't need to know how to make records, they need to know how to run a large company... how to make the assets work harder, cut finance costs, improve supply chains... all the things normal CEOs do.
PE firms have been doing this for years and years. It's not really any different from the massive conglomerates that used to be popular, except that PE firms are required to generate higher returns and have more flexibility in the way they run a firm, because they take them private.
It's just a very pure form of capitalism. Their investors benefit - pension funds and insurers, largely. They also make shedloads themselves, and agreed a beneficial tax regime with the Revenue back in 1987, so a lot of their income is not taxed in the usual way. That's galling, but it was the Revenue that gave it to them.
The track record of private equity firms in "doing a better job" in pure capitalist terms speaks for itself - they make more money for shareholders, and that's why people pay them.
PE firms have been doing this for years and years. It's not really any different from the massive conglomerates that used to be popular, except that PE firms are required to generate higher returns and have more flexibility in the way they run a firm, because they take them private.
It's just a very pure form of capitalism. Their investors benefit - pension funds and insurers, largely. They also make shedloads themselves, and agreed a beneficial tax regime with the Revenue back in 1987, so a lot of their income is not taxed in the usual way. That's galling, but it was the Revenue that gave it to them.
The track record of private equity firms in "doing a better job" in pure capitalist terms speaks for itself - they make more money for shareholders, and that's why people pay them.
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SE15/EC4
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PE executives usually have some knowledge of the sector they target. Plus they usually hire an industry figure to be the new CEO or chairman - they don't run it day-to-day, they are more like owners with a board seat.
Talent and creativity, yes. That's part of the story. PE pay is not in the public domain, so people can get paid without the public outcry that happens when public company managers' pay is disclosed.
Increasingly, hedge funds are getting the best talent for those kinds of reasons - more flexibility in setting compensation.
Talent and creativity, yes. That's part of the story. PE pay is not in the public domain, so people can get paid without the public outcry that happens when public company managers' pay is disclosed.
Increasingly, hedge funds are getting the best talent for those kinds of reasons - more flexibility in setting compensation.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
61
11 January 2021 03:08 PM