View Poll Results: well?
yes
5
83.33%
no
1
16.67%
Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll
Foreign Policy suggestion...
12 November 2006, 10:49 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Foreign Policy suggestion...
1. Insofar as we can avoid being entangled in the Middle East at all, we should.
2. Insofar as we can remain neutral in the various conflicts (not only Israeli-Arab, but Arab-Arab, Arab-Persian, Sunni-Shi'ite, Islamist-Ba'athist, and a dozen other rivalries), we should.
3. Insofar as we are forced to take sides, we should do so in a manner that does not draw us deeper into the conflict than we already are.
4. Insofar as we are forced to take sides, we should side with whomever is least hostile to Britain and closest to ourselves in civilisational character.
Yes or no?
2. Insofar as we can remain neutral in the various conflicts (not only Israeli-Arab, but Arab-Arab, Arab-Persian, Sunni-Shi'ite, Islamist-Ba'athist, and a dozen other rivalries), we should.
3. Insofar as we are forced to take sides, we should do so in a manner that does not draw us deeper into the conflict than we already are.
4. Insofar as we are forced to take sides, we should side with whomever is least hostile to Britain and closest to ourselves in civilisational character.
Yes or no?
12 November 2006, 10:53 PM
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cas Vegas
Posts: 60,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12 November 2006, 10:58 PM
#3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bubba po
Now git votin' bubba...
12 November 2006, 10:59 PM
#4
Scooby Regular
5. We are a paltry, tiny little island whom taxes its population to death so we can mix it with the big boys on foreign policy. We should bring all our troops home and concentrate on our own societies problems before sticking our greedy little noses into other peoples for the sake of a fast buck, when ultimately it will end up costing us billions to fight an unexpectedly long war for no justifiable reason whatsoever.
12 November 2006, 11:52 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unclebuck
1. Insofar as we can avoid being entangled in the Middle East at all, we should.
2. Insofar as we can remain neutral in the various conflicts (not only Israeli-Arab, but Arab-Arab, Arab-Persian, Sunni-Shi'ite, Islamist-Ba'athist, and a dozen other rivalries), we should.
3. Insofar as we are forced to take sides, we should do so in a manner that does not draw us deeper into the conflict than we already are.
4. Insofar as we are forced to take sides, we should side with whomever is least hostile to Britain and closest to ourselves in civilisational character.
Yes or no?
2. Insofar as we can remain neutral in the various conflicts (not only Israeli-Arab, but Arab-Arab, Arab-Persian, Sunni-Shi'ite, Islamist-Ba'athist, and a dozen other rivalries), we should.
3. Insofar as we are forced to take sides, we should do so in a manner that does not draw us deeper into the conflict than we already are.
4. Insofar as we are forced to take sides, we should side with whomever is least hostile to Britain and closest to ourselves in civilisational character.
Yes or no?
1) should be a matter of standard foreign policy.
There are also many who would argue that 2) is already true and if not entirely true it is a working objective.
3) see 1)
I can't agree with 4) as that is tantamount to selling your soul to the devil for an easy life. Sometimes principles do need to come to the fore.
Now awaits the trick, as it seems unlikely I would ever agree with you spontaneously!
Rannoch
13 November 2006, 08:37 AM
#6
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another UB cut and paste from the BNP website!
But you left out number 5 though...... why's that I wonder?
5. The principal threat to Britain, emanating from the Middle East today, is the ideological and demographic expansionism of Islam.
But you left out number 5 though...... why's that I wonder?
5. The principal threat to Britain, emanating from the Middle East today, is the ideological and demographic expansionism of Islam.
13 November 2006, 11:14 AM
#7
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rannoch
I am impressed
Rannoch
Rannoch
British National Party - BNP Middle East policy is in national interest
Trending Topics
13 November 2006, 11:23 AM
#8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DCI Gene Hunt
Another UB cut and paste from the BNP website!
But you left out number 5 though...... why's that I wonder?
5. The principal threat to Britain, emanating from the Middle East today, is the ideological and demographic expansionism of Islam.
But you left out number 5 though...... why's that I wonder?
5. The principal threat to Britain, emanating from the Middle East today, is the ideological and demographic expansionism of Islam.
https://www.scoobynet.com/5985474-post34.html
What a lovely well balanced view
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post