Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Concorde successor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 15, 2005 | 03:57 PM
  #1  
Geezer's Avatar
Geezer
Thread Starter
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
From: North Wales
Cool Concorde successor

In the BBC News today. Pity we couldn't get involved and have left it to the Frogs and Japs!

Geezer
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2005 | 04:05 PM
  #3  
EddScott's Avatar
EddScott
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,575
Likes: 65
From: West Wales
Default

Think 300 passengers might be optimistic. IIRC the passenger level on Concorde was very low.

Theres a program on one of the documentary channels about "Planes that never flew" and there is one about a very big super-sonic boeing aircraft. They got all but to the building of the real thing and decided it wouldn't work. The 747 was designed for haulage initially then some bright spark decided the fill it full of seats and save boeing.

Plus, Concorde never sold becuase almost instantly got banned from most airports for being too loud and the sonic boom upsetting cows or summat!!!

The Dreamliner I thought was a smidgen under sub-sonic. From the little knowledge I have of aircraft industry, bigger would appear to be better although not much faster - bums on seats etc.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2005 | 04:15 PM
  #5  
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 11,314
Likes: 4
From: same time, different place
Default

I got the impression that they're falling between two stools.

They want enough seats to make it commercially viable, yet it only cuts the journey time by what, 20%?

If they don't watch out they'll make it too big to be quick, which will make it Just Another Jet. Certainly won't be son of Concorde, it'll be second cousin thrice removed. The advantage is that they're developing a fairly quick replacement to the 737 for the 21st century, but that's about it.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2005 | 05:24 PM
  #6  
GaryK's Avatar
GaryK
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,037
Likes: 0
From: Bedfordshire
Default

I had to re-read that report because I thought I got it wrong "split an investment of $1.84m (£1.01m) a year for 3 years" hmmm lets build a new supersonic plane with a £3 million R&D budget I mean come on, need to add a few noughts onto that surely!!!

Gary
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2005 | 06:49 PM
  #7  
wez_sti's Avatar
wez_sti
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
From: All over...so who needs a car!
Default

what the f*ck will £1million buy you in R&D terms on this scale??

a chairman, a director of research and a japaneses/french translators salary maybe???
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2005 | 10:45 PM
  #8  
wacky.banana's Avatar
wacky.banana
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 1
Thumbs up

Interesting piece. My take on this though is that if they want any new supersonic plane to succeed then its just got to have a flat four engine in it, running a modified dump valve, panel filter and exhaust, and some kind of JDM domestic flight map.

Good for 10K bhp at least!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlightMan
Non Scooby Related
25
Aug 23, 2006 11:24 AM
Bravo2zero_sps
Non Scooby Related
28
Mar 19, 2005 07:52 PM
pslewis
Non Scooby Related
8
Mar 2, 2005 06:30 PM
Chip
Non Scooby Related
23
Sep 18, 2003 01:20 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:29 AM.