Choosing the sex of your baby
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The land of Daisies and Bubbles!
Posts: 5,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Choosing the sex of your baby
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0...315295,00.html
What are people's thoughts on this? I don't feel comfortable with it, but I don't really know why.
If someone was really desperate to have a baby and going through IVF - would they really worry about what sex it was?
And are we in danger of creating a society where only 'perfect' is acceptable?
Genuinely curious in what the general feeling is...
What are people's thoughts on this? I don't feel comfortable with it, but I don't really know why.
If someone was really desperate to have a baby and going through IVF - would they really worry about what sex it was?
And are we in danger of creating a society where only 'perfect' is acceptable?
Genuinely curious in what the general feeling is...
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
i remember when this option was first available years ago.i havnt read the article you posted....imagine what would happen to communitys where it was preferable to have a boy, no girls would be born
there is a natural balance the way nature intended
i dont agree with it unless it is to stop families conceiving a child of a certain sex where there are problems .
anyway what would happen where the docs get it wrong and you had the wrong sex child.would you keep it (hyperthetical you), if you would , what a waste of time in the first place.
my opinion
there is a natural balance the way nature intended
i dont agree with it unless it is to stop families conceiving a child of a certain sex where there are problems .
anyway what would happen where the docs get it wrong and you had the wrong sex child.would you keep it (hyperthetical you), if you would , what a waste of time in the first place.
my opinion
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sarasquares
i remember when this option was first available years ago.i havnt read the article you posted....imagine what would happen to communitys where it was preferable to have a boy, no girls would be born
there is a natural balance the way nature intended
i dont agree with it unless it is to stop families conceiving a child of a certain sex where there are problems .
anyway what would happen where the docs get it wrong and you had the wrong sex child.would you keep it (hyperthetical you), if you would , what a waste of time in the first place.
my opinion
there is a natural balance the way nature intended
i dont agree with it unless it is to stop families conceiving a child of a certain sex where there are problems .
anyway what would happen where the docs get it wrong and you had the wrong sex child.would you keep it (hyperthetical you), if you would , what a waste of time in the first place.
my opinion
From a personal perspective, I don't give a monkeys - if you are paying for it. I'd prefer IVF be taken off the NHS so if you want a baby you pay for it, it's a lifestyle choice afterall not a matter of life and death.
I suspect the number IVF births world wide accound for such a small percentage that even if every single one was male for example it wouldn't make a significant change to the overall population split.
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dum dum de dum....
Posts: 2,617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sarasquares
there is a natural balance the way nature intended
As long as they are happy and healthy that's all that matters to me
#5
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The land of Daisies and Bubbles!
Posts: 5,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From a personal perspective, I don't give a monkeys - if you are paying for it. I'd prefer IVF be taken off the NHS so if you want a baby you pay for it, it's a lifestyle choice afterall not a matter of life and death.
I suppose as long as it's only available to those who can't have kids the natural way then the percentages would be small - but if it became available to people who could afford to pay for it, irrespective of whether they could conceive naturally or not, then potentially the numbers could grow - especially in cultures where having a girl is considered bad.
Mind you, I guess they'd soon figure out that we do have our uses when they realise that little boys have to come from somewhere.....
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drunken Bungle *****
If everything that came under the heading of 'lifestyle choice' was taken off the NHS then there wouldn't be much left.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
didnt they say though it was only going to be available in certain circumstances, i.e a couple have 4 girls and want their 5th child to be a boy.... dont think its a case of pic and mix though
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OllyK
Sure - but you're not gonna die if you don't have a sprog, you may do so if you don't get treated for a disease, self inflicted or not. Sure drawing the lines isn't an easy one for some cases, but dropping IVF off the list of treatments offered by the NHS is a no-brainer IMO.
I also find it very sad that people are so intent on bringing more and more babies into the world, when there are so many children (babies included) awaiting adoption. So, not only are the taxpayers paying for the IVF treatment, but we are also paying to keep those other poor kids in a home as well. Seems a very poor way of running things in my opinion..
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: nix fur bremser...
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I also find it very sad that people are so intent on bringing more and more babies into the world, when there are so many children (babies included) awaiting adoption. So, not only are the taxpayers paying for the IVF treatment, but we are also paying to keep those other poor kids in a home as well. Seems a very poor way of running things in my opinion..
Cheers
Kav
#11
I don't agree with it at all. Echoing what has already been said above, in future generations being allowed to choose the sex of your baby is going to cause huge problems, as it is inevitible that there will be a great deal more of one sex than the other. If this kind of thing carries on, no one will conceive naturally anymore, and everyone will opt for IVF treatment so as to be able to determine the sex of their child, instead of potentially getting lumbered with something they didn't want.
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Surviving as a soldier of fortune on the Los Angeles underground...
Posts: 7,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure about this one.
Had our first last year - both me and the misses had it in our heads that it was going to be a girl - turned out to be a boy.
When asked "how many kids do you want" I've always thought 3, but not all the same sex. If our second was to be a boy also, I'd like some way of making sure the third was a girl - for reason I'd think I was missing out if we never had at least 1 of each.
Posh Spice will be along shortly to back me up...
Had our first last year - both me and the misses had it in our heads that it was going to be a girl - turned out to be a boy.
When asked "how many kids do you want" I've always thought 3, but not all the same sex. If our second was to be a boy also, I'd like some way of making sure the third was a girl - for reason I'd think I was missing out if we never had at least 1 of each.
Posh Spice will be along shortly to back me up...
#13
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Drunken Bungle *****
If everything that came under the heading of 'lifestyle choice' was taken off the NHS then there wouldn't be much left.
I suppose as long as it's only available to those who can't have kids the natural way then the percentages would be small - but if it became available to people who could afford to pay for it, irrespective of whether they could conceive naturally or not, then potentially the numbers could grow - especially in cultures where having a girl is considered bad.
Mind you, I guess they'd soon figure out that we do have our uses when they realise that little boys have to come from somewhere.....
I suppose as long as it's only available to those who can't have kids the natural way then the percentages would be small - but if it became available to people who could afford to pay for it, irrespective of whether they could conceive naturally or not, then potentially the numbers could grow - especially in cultures where having a girl is considered bad.
Mind you, I guess they'd soon figure out that we do have our uses when they realise that little boys have to come from somewhere.....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RS_Matt
Non Scooby Related
2
17 September 2015 08:59 PM