What is it about London...
#1
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is it about London...
...and it's never-ending quest to spend massive amounts of money on things that cost a fraction elsewhere?
See Backing for £385m Thames bridge.
We have already seen such madness in the £900M "dome" that nobody can get to, and the as yet unfinished £750M Wembley Stadium whose park-and-ride is at the NEC!!!!
Why on Earth should a "bridge" cost £385M??
For crying out loud - the M6 Toll cost less than a billion quid, so for the same cost as the "bridge" you could have built 10 miles of 6-lane motorway (including buying the land, public enquiries, toll infrastructure, service areas etc.). The M6 Toll itself has quite a few bridges itself, including some pretty big ones at the two M6 junctions and the M42 intersection!
Are TfL having a giraffe???
mb
p.s. and if you follow the BBC links, earlier estimates put the price of the bridge at £450M - so i won't be surprised if the final cost is far more
See Backing for £385m Thames bridge.
We have already seen such madness in the £900M "dome" that nobody can get to, and the as yet unfinished £750M Wembley Stadium whose park-and-ride is at the NEC!!!!
Why on Earth should a "bridge" cost £385M??
For crying out loud - the M6 Toll cost less than a billion quid, so for the same cost as the "bridge" you could have built 10 miles of 6-lane motorway (including buying the land, public enquiries, toll infrastructure, service areas etc.). The M6 Toll itself has quite a few bridges itself, including some pretty big ones at the two M6 junctions and the M42 intersection!
Are TfL having a giraffe???
mb
p.s. and if you follow the BBC links, earlier estimates put the price of the bridge at £450M - so i won't be surprised if the final cost is far more
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wembley for £750m. No way. It'll end up at around £1billion.
Why do public works always overrun on the cost. Seems like a licence to print money. If they quote £750 thats what it should be.
Look at the Scottish parliament. That is a total joke.Not bad from an original cost of £62m. This has now risen to £430 of British taxpayers money. WHY? We should be told.
Chip.
Why do public works always overrun on the cost. Seems like a licence to print money. If they quote £750 thats what it should be.
Look at the Scottish parliament. That is a total joke.Not bad from an original cost of £62m. This has now risen to £430 of British taxpayers money. WHY? We should be told.
Chip.
Last edited by Chip; 28 March 2004 at 08:46 PM.
#3
would anybody care to give me a brief breakdown of why it costs close to £1b to build a stadium?
the riverside stadium in teesside cost £16m in 1995. now i know it was built a few years ago, its only half the size of wembley, its not in london, wont have 'state of the art' facilities anymore, but where does the other £984m go? by my reckoning you can build 62 riverside stadiums for the price of wembley. that fuc*ing ridiculous!!
its not as though were talking about the 'odd' million pounds here is it? £984 MILLION pounds?
the riverside stadium in teesside cost £16m in 1995. now i know it was built a few years ago, its only half the size of wembley, its not in london, wont have 'state of the art' facilities anymore, but where does the other £984m go? by my reckoning you can build 62 riverside stadiums for the price of wembley. that fuc*ing ridiculous!!
its not as though were talking about the 'odd' million pounds here is it? £984 MILLION pounds?
#4
Matt 85
Even better example is the Millenium Stadium - had to knock down a great big old stadium on the site, it's as big as wembley, with a closing roof, and bang in the middle of a city (not on a wharf ) - around £70m IIRC- £900 and something million quid cheaper ....
Even better example is the Millenium Stadium - had to knock down a great big old stadium on the site, it's as big as wembley, with a closing roof, and bang in the middle of a city (not on a wharf ) - around £70m IIRC- £900 and something million quid cheaper ....
Last edited by Fat Boy; 28 March 2004 at 10:02 PM. Reason: spoolling orrer
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Not ANOTHER free, paid for by the taxpayers, bridge for the whinging Londoners?
Time they stopped pandering to that lot, and made bridges like the Humber and the Severn and Dartford, free.
Where I live, about 20 miles from the Humber bridge, if you need treatment in a BIG hospital, you have to travel to Hull..........nearly £5 return, each and every time you go So don't get cancer, or something like that, round here
But if you have relatives in Hull prison, you can cross for nowt!!!
B@stard lying Labour!!!!!!!!!!
Alcazar
Time they stopped pandering to that lot, and made bridges like the Humber and the Severn and Dartford, free.
Where I live, about 20 miles from the Humber bridge, if you need treatment in a BIG hospital, you have to travel to Hull..........nearly £5 return, each and every time you go So don't get cancer, or something like that, round here
But if you have relatives in Hull prison, you can cross for nowt!!!
B@stard lying Labour!!!!!!!!!!
Alcazar
#7
The London lot can just **** right off. Why didn't they build their city just to one side of the river instead of right across it in the first place? They already have more bridges than any other town I can think of.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by alcazar
Not ANOTHER free, paid for by the taxpayers, bridge for the whinging Londoners?
it's us. we make the most money. we pay the most tax. want to burrow my fork to get that chip off your shoulder?
#9
Scooby Senior
Theres nothing outside London anyway, so why waste good money on rural communities when theres far more important things to spend money on in London!
Well, thats what some Southerner told me and I believe him
Well, thats what some Southerner told me and I believe him
#10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by ProperCharlie
and who pays the most in tax? is it all those "industrialists" in the north? err... no.
it's us. we make the most money. we pay the most tax. want to burrow my fork to get that chip off your shoulder?
it's us. we make the most money. we pay the most tax. want to burrow my fork to get that chip off your shoulder?
I may have a chip on my shoulder about fekkin London, I hate the place and I hate most Londoners, but I'm heartily sick of seeing them get everything at a subsidised rate, while the rest of us continue to pay through the nose.
Alcazar
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by alcazar
Don't talk soft.......just 'cos there's more of you there, doesn't mean you pay more tax than the other cities of the Uk put together
i went passed watford once - arrived at a place called scotland.
#14
Scooby Senior
I thought London was just a little village (1sq mile?) surrounded by lots of other little villages. Thats why its full of backwards village folk!
Now Preston, that's a real city
Now Preston, that's a real city
#15
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well after reading http://www.itv-f1.com/bahrain/features/story/20367 i have just got to bring this back to the top!
How can Bahrain build a brand new F1 circuit, from scratch, in the desert, with every facility that you can imagine, for a mere £80M (versus TfL and their three, er, four, er, maybe five hundred million for a pont)?
Oh, and the F1 circuit took a mere 16 months, where-as the bridge is anticipated to take 9 years
I bet you won't be allowed to do an average of 130mph over the Thames Gateway either
mb
How can Bahrain build a brand new F1 circuit, from scratch, in the desert, with every facility that you can imagine, for a mere £80M (versus TfL and their three, er, four, er, maybe five hundred million for a pont)?
Construction of the [F1] circuit cost $150 million and took 16 months. At its peak, more than 3,000 people were working on the project.
- 70,000 cubic metres of concrete were used in the construction of the track, along with 8,500 tons of steel. The circuit is enclosed by 82,000 tyres and 5,000 metres of fencing.
- The track can accommodate 45,000 spectators – around seven per cent of the population of Bahrain! There is grandstand seating for 10,000 and parking for 13,000 cars.
- It is expected that the average lap time for an F1 car around the circuit will be 1m33s, with drivers averaging a speed of 130mph.
- 70,000 cubic metres of concrete were used in the construction of the track, along with 8,500 tons of steel. The circuit is enclosed by 82,000 tyres and 5,000 metres of fencing.
- The track can accommodate 45,000 spectators – around seven per cent of the population of Bahrain! There is grandstand seating for 10,000 and parking for 13,000 cars.
- It is expected that the average lap time for an F1 car around the circuit will be 1m33s, with drivers averaging a speed of 130mph.
I bet you won't be allowed to do an average of 130mph over the Thames Gateway either
mb
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Home mostly
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by boomer
Well after reading http://www.itv-f1.com/bahrain/features/story/20367 i have just got to bring this back to the top!
How can Bahrain build a brand new F1 circuit, from scratch, in the desert, with every facility that you can imagine, for a mere £80M (versus TfL and their three, er, four, er, maybe five hundred million for a pont)?
mb
How can Bahrain build a brand new F1 circuit, from scratch, in the desert, with every facility that you can imagine, for a mere £80M (versus TfL and their three, er, four, er, maybe five hundred million for a pont)?
mb
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And maybe, just maybe the cost of getting the heavy engineering there, coupled with the massive cost of buying the land needed and the penalties incurred for the extra congestion the build will cause.
The bridge itself will probably account for less than a 1/4 of the total cost.
The bridge itself will probably account for less than a 1/4 of the total cost.
#18
Originally Posted by planky
Probably too simplistic,but i guess labour rates out there will be much more lower than London rates.
THATS why the track was'"cheap"!!!
#20
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Preston, Lancs.
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now Preston, that's a real city
Granted, we have a polyversity, but i've never tripped over a cathedral anywhere in town. Do we have to grow to meet blackburn before we are fully "qualified" as a city?
Have the criteria been lessened these days? Maybe we got "citied" for having the first KFC outlet in the uk or for having the first piece of motorway.
John.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Puff The Magic Wagon!
Non Scooby Related
2
20 January 2011 01:24 PM