Robot Revolution
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Robot Revolution
I may be wrong in thinking that but I thought that it would be an interesting topic to discuss.
Not really a new story on the robots taking over, but further studies revive it.
A total of 35% of UK jobs are at risk of replacement within 20 years, dropping to 30% in London...
They said advances in technology will likely lead to jobs that require repetitive processing, clerical and support services being replaced by those that need digital, management and creative skills.
The researchers also warned that if the "significant shift" in the labour market is not handled properly it could lead to a widening of the gap between rich and poor...
The jobs considered to be at high risk are those in office and administrative support, sales and services, transportation, production and construction and extraction.
Jobs in skilled management, financial services, computing, engineering, science, education, legal services, community services, the arts and media and healthcare are seen as being "low or no risk".
Source: http://news.sky.com/story/1544884/ro...-take-your-job
So, if the new generation starts getting qualified with 'low or no risk' job qualifications, won't such fields become more competitive and over-crowded and the positions less achievable/less paid? I know we've already been thorough a bout or two of that in last few years, but with more and more robotic input, what are we expecting in coming years?
What do you think the future holds? To me, it looks concerning. I may be wrong (again!) hence the proposal for discussion.
It will also be interesting to look back where we were, and where we are, now; with the assistance of the robots.
Not really a new story on the robots taking over, but further studies revive it.
A total of 35% of UK jobs are at risk of replacement within 20 years, dropping to 30% in London...
They said advances in technology will likely lead to jobs that require repetitive processing, clerical and support services being replaced by those that need digital, management and creative skills.
The researchers also warned that if the "significant shift" in the labour market is not handled properly it could lead to a widening of the gap between rich and poor...
The jobs considered to be at high risk are those in office and administrative support, sales and services, transportation, production and construction and extraction.
Jobs in skilled management, financial services, computing, engineering, science, education, legal services, community services, the arts and media and healthcare are seen as being "low or no risk".
Source: http://news.sky.com/story/1544884/ro...-take-your-job
So, if the new generation starts getting qualified with 'low or no risk' job qualifications, won't such fields become more competitive and over-crowded and the positions less achievable/less paid? I know we've already been thorough a bout or two of that in last few years, but with more and more robotic input, what are we expecting in coming years?
What do you think the future holds? To me, it looks concerning. I may be wrong (again!) hence the proposal for discussion.
It will also be interesting to look back where we were, and where we are, now; with the assistance of the robots.
#4
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You sound as if you don't give a fekk to whatever happens in future to our humankind.
#5
Scooby Regular
Or aliens will invade,,,, hahaha
In all seriousness most of the things you see in scifi will eventualy happen, just a mater of time till we are going to the stars.
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You know, SJ. You make a really good point. Let's see what others think of it. In my opinion, if the robots are homegrown, there'll be less upheaval. If they're Polish, it may kick off big stylee here That will go down in history books as British Human Revolution against Polish, job pinching, waste of space Robot Revolution. Revolution vs revolution, wow! Shame I may be dead by then, or in a care home, being bathed and fed by some Polish robot nurse. So, yeah, there's a hope to see the drama unfold.
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: If you're not braking or accelerating you're wasting time.
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's all been said before.We all have a life of luxury while the robots/computers do all the donkey work.
WRONG WRONG WRONG.
The bosses realise you can do more & more yourself & load you up until you break.
WRONG WRONG WRONG.
The bosses realise you can do more & more yourself & load you up until you break.
#13
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, let's say, say it all again. With more research and development around us, I'm sure what we say either modifies, reduces or enhances. Therefore it's good to discuss it again.
So, in future, if we have robots to do our more and more of our donkey type of work, we don't have to break our humans for donkeys. Shall I add it as a positive, then? Or am I getting it wrong, wrong, wrong?
Say if I'm getting it right, won't it still cause a negative impact such as less certain type of jobs, as quoted in the opening post? That will be a negative, won't it?
Say if I'm getting it wrong, what's right, then?
Hodgy, let's cover it again. That's if we have the capacity to expand on it, considering further development.
In order to meet the second posit from the original inquiry of this thread, I reckon vacuum cleaner has been life changing But one day, if a vacuum cleaner operates a vacuum cleaner (meaning machine operating a machine), I'd certainly be made redundant from that job in my home.
BTW, Mr. Bean is cool. I bet he regrets not having a robot to stuff his turkey in his Christmas episode
We all have a life of luxury while the robots/computers do all the donkey work.
WRONG WRONG WRONG.
The bosses realise you can do more & more yourself & load you up until you break.
WRONG WRONG WRONG.
The bosses realise you can do more & more yourself & load you up until you break.
Say if I'm getting it right, won't it still cause a negative impact such as less certain type of jobs, as quoted in the opening post? That will be a negative, won't it?
Say if I'm getting it wrong, what's right, then?
Hodgy, let's cover it again. That's if we have the capacity to expand on it, considering further development.
In order to meet the second posit from the original inquiry of this thread, I reckon vacuum cleaner has been life changing But one day, if a vacuum cleaner operates a vacuum cleaner (meaning machine operating a machine), I'd certainly be made redundant from that job in my home.
BTW, Mr. Bean is cool. I bet he regrets not having a robot to stuff his turkey in his Christmas episode
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Not the Wild West
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having worked in engineering most of my life I like this stuff from a mechanical point of view. Having been in two series of Robot Wars I can only dream of some of the things some people achieve. That point where a robot stops looking like a robot and more like it has a mind of its own is a little scary.
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: If you're not braking or accelerating you're wasting time.
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, let's say, say it all again. With more research and development around us, I'm sure what we say either modifies, reduces or enhances. Therefore it's good to discuss it again.
So, in future, if we have robots to do our more and more of our donkey type of work, we don't have to break our humans for donkeys. Shall I add it as a positive, then? Or am I getting it wrong, wrong, wrong?
Say if I'm getting it right, won't it still cause a negative impact such as less certain type of jobs, as quoted in the opening post? That will be a negative, won't it?
Say if I'm getting it wrong, what's right, then?
Hodgy, let's cover it again. That's if we have the capacity to expand on it, considering further development.
In order to meet the second posit from the original inquiry of this thread, I reckon vacuum cleaner has been life changing But one day, if a vacuum cleaner operates a vacuum cleaner (meaning machine operating a machine), I'd certainly be made redundant from that job in my home.
BTW, Mr. Bean is cool. I bet he regrets not having a robot to stuff his turkey in his Christmas episode
So, in future, if we have robots to do our more and more of our donkey type of work, we don't have to break our humans for donkeys. Shall I add it as a positive, then? Or am I getting it wrong, wrong, wrong?
Say if I'm getting it right, won't it still cause a negative impact such as less certain type of jobs, as quoted in the opening post? That will be a negative, won't it?
Say if I'm getting it wrong, what's right, then?
Hodgy, let's cover it again. That's if we have the capacity to expand on it, considering further development.
In order to meet the second posit from the original inquiry of this thread, I reckon vacuum cleaner has been life changing But one day, if a vacuum cleaner operates a vacuum cleaner (meaning machine operating a machine), I'd certainly be made redundant from that job in my home.
BTW, Mr. Bean is cool. I bet he regrets not having a robot to stuff his turkey in his Christmas episode
#17
I visited the Mini factory in Oxford last year, absolutely amazing. It was a robotic ballet. Apparently it is one of the most efficient car plants in the world
A few points that stood out.
Everything on the production line is sold, no more car compounds full of cars waiting for someone to buy them.
Every car on the production line was different, it must be an impressive computer program that ensures all the right bits for the right car converge at the right place and time for assembly
There were about as many robot technicians to maintain the robots as assembly workers
Some human input was required, to put the wiring looms in for instance
Overall an impressive day out, highly recommended. In our group we had someone not really interested but came along with her husband, even she was blown away by the end of the tour
A few points that stood out.
Everything on the production line is sold, no more car compounds full of cars waiting for someone to buy them.
Every car on the production line was different, it must be an impressive computer program that ensures all the right bits for the right car converge at the right place and time for assembly
There were about as many robot technicians to maintain the robots as assembly workers
Some human input was required, to put the wiring looms in for instance
Overall an impressive day out, highly recommended. In our group we had someone not really interested but came along with her husband, even she was blown away by the end of the tour
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post