DVD Recorder help.
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thinking of buying a DVD recorder as the video is on its last legs now. Any ideas as whats good , bad etc. Budget of about £350.
If I connect the new DVD to my Home cinema will I get 5.1 sound from it if prog is recorded from digital TV.
Or would I be better off getting Skyplus+
Cheers
Chip.
If I connect the new DVD to my Home cinema will I get 5.1 sound from it if prog is recorded from digital TV.
Or would I be better off getting Skyplus+
Cheers
Chip.
#5
Philips are expensive and Ive never seen one get more than 3 stars. Home cinema magazines don't like them.
I think its alot to do with features for the price. The dont have that many extra's.
I also know the recording quality and playback on a 'Panny' is very good. Ive had a DMR E30 and DMR E50.
I think its alot to do with features for the price. The dont have that many extra's.
I also know the recording quality and playback on a 'Panny' is very good. Ive had a DMR E30 and DMR E50.
#6
Chip: Have a look here
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00009K3TU/ref=sr_aps_electronics_1_1/026-5455387-2300461
Panny E50 for £249.99. Absolute bargain. I thought mine was abargain at £399
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00009K3TU/ref=sr_aps_electronics_1_1/026-5455387-2300461
Panny E50 for £249.99. Absolute bargain. I thought mine was abargain at £399
Trending Topics
#8
I would advise against getting a Phillips - I bought one six months ago and the laser has failed and it is currently being repaired.
If you look this up on a search engine Phillips are having huge reliability problems with their DVD recorders - I would get a Panasonic.
If you look this up on a search engine Phillips are having huge reliability problems with their DVD recorders - I would get a Panasonic.
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Brands aside, I would recommend that you get a DVD+ format recorder, way superior to DVD- or DVD-RAM. www.dvdplusrw.org for the doubters.....
#10
Richersounds have the Philips DVDR75 (Multi Region) in their sale at £219 - Absolute bargain
Only thing is its in store only (and not mail order)
Sky+ is superb - you'll never use you're video again. And now with ability to record 2 channels at once.
Use with DVD writer to archive stuff off the Sky+ box.
i.e. Get both
Cheers
Mark
[Edited by Gizmo555 - 12/29/2003 5:43:11 PM]
Only thing is its in store only (and not mail order)
Sky+ is superb - you'll never use you're video again. And now with ability to record 2 channels at once.
Use with DVD writer to archive stuff off the Sky+ box.
i.e. Get both
Cheers
Mark
[Edited by Gizmo555 - 12/29/2003 5:43:11 PM]
#11
Be very careful whith the Phillips Dvd recorders. I have one, bought it 1 yr ago. Not so good now, not that pleased with it. I would wait too c who wins the format war. Ie Dvdr+ or dvdr-.
Albert
Albert
#12
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Essex
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm thinking of doing the same, and have come to the conclusion they don't yet make a machine that does what I want for a reasonable price.
I need: i link, Digital out, DTS, and SVCD capability. I dont think the Panny E50 has digital out.
Allan
I need: i link, Digital out, DTS, and SVCD capability. I dont think the Panny E50 has digital out.
Allan
#14
Hey up Albert me old mucker!!!
Chip,
My Philips DVD880 Recorder has gone t1ts up after about a year. It will record and play on the TV no probs, but will not play any of my Region 1 or 2 DVD collection. I am now going to consign it to the bedroom as a stand alone recorder and get a Hard Drive/DVD combi recorder thingy!!
The theme of this thread has been "anti Philips", and I would have to agree. Steer clear!!
Craig
Chip,
My Philips DVD880 Recorder has gone t1ts up after about a year. It will record and play on the TV no probs, but will not play any of my Region 1 or 2 DVD collection. I am now going to consign it to the bedroom as a stand alone recorder and get a Hard Drive/DVD combi recorder thingy!!
The theme of this thread has been "anti Philips", and I would have to agree. Steer clear!!
Craig
#16
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Amazing, Ive had all sorts over the years inc Sony which I will never ever buy again and the two that have been best for TV/ video are Philips and I hate to say Matsui of which I have a video player which is 16 years old and never missed a beat likewise a portale tv used daily which is 14 years old.
Chip.
Chip.
#17
Chip,
I actually think that Philips are a good brand. I just don't think that they have the DVD Recorder side of things sorted yet. They do very well in the reviews, they just don't last very long!!
Craig.
I actually think that Philips are a good brand. I just don't think that they have the DVD Recorder side of things sorted yet. They do very well in the reviews, they just don't last very long!!
Craig.
#18
I'll think you'll find the 880 and 990 older generation recorder are the ones giving problems.
The DVDR70 75 and 80 are new generation and might be better ?
Would be worth checking this out first before condeming Phillips cause they're excellent value for money.
The DVDR70 75 and 80 are new generation and might be better ?
Would be worth checking this out first before condeming Phillips cause they're excellent value for money.
#19
Their are two separate issues here.
1)Which format recorder do you want?
2)Who makes them and do you like them as a brand?
To say "Dont get Philips" or "dont get Panasonic" is missing the point of which format you will be buying.
I say the +RW standard is by far the better one as it is far more compatible with other players without having to use a write-once +R disc.
The only thing going for the Panasonic is its watch and record at same time - but how often will you really need it? It is totally incompatible with anything but another Pansonic DVD-RAM drive.
-RW is nowhere in my opinion. If you use the 'compatibility' mode which supposedly enables -RW discs to be read by other players, you cannot do half the editing things you can with +RW.
I had a Philips DVDR880 for a year. It went wrong three times - each time it was the laser unit. Now I have a newer DVDR70 and so far so good.
I can take discs around to friends houses etc that I have recorded and the rewitable disc works straight away in their machines - this is the most useful feature I think coupled with splitting titles up after recording has finished, choosing your own pics for the menus etc. As was said previously, www.dvdplusrw.org has all the info and compares +RW and -RW together. Once you see this there isnt really a choice, +RW is the king!
Jon.
1)Which format recorder do you want?
2)Who makes them and do you like them as a brand?
To say "Dont get Philips" or "dont get Panasonic" is missing the point of which format you will be buying.
I say the +RW standard is by far the better one as it is far more compatible with other players without having to use a write-once +R disc.
The only thing going for the Panasonic is its watch and record at same time - but how often will you really need it? It is totally incompatible with anything but another Pansonic DVD-RAM drive.
-RW is nowhere in my opinion. If you use the 'compatibility' mode which supposedly enables -RW discs to be read by other players, you cannot do half the editing things you can with +RW.
I had a Philips DVDR880 for a year. It went wrong three times - each time it was the laser unit. Now I have a newer DVDR70 and so far so good.
I can take discs around to friends houses etc that I have recorded and the rewitable disc works straight away in their machines - this is the most useful feature I think coupled with splitting titles up after recording has finished, choosing your own pics for the menus etc. As was said previously, www.dvdplusrw.org has all the info and compares +RW and -RW together. Once you see this there isnt really a choice, +RW is the king!
Jon.
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: elsewhere
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd try Sky+ and see how you get on. Cheaper in the short term (£199, look for offers on installation) and you can always eBay it later if you don't like it.
Providing you subscribe to two premium channels (sports or movies) then the £10 subscription is waivered. You also get DD5.1 optical out for hooking up to your processor. A lot of the movies are now broadcast in DD.
The quality is probably slightly better as well. Sky+ records the MPEG2 bitstream as it comes off the satellite, rather than having to convert to analogue, pass to DVD Recorder and recompress as MPEG2 to write to the disc.
Sky+ allows you to watch one Sky channel whilst recording another.
You can also easily upgrade the HDD to a larger capacity, although this obviously invalidates the warranty.
I've had a TiVO for 2 years and would miss a lot of the features a PVR provides if I had to switch back to traditional recording.
The only downside with Sky+ over a standalone product is that Sky retain control of the programmes as it is a closed system. The software will allow them to prevent FFWD of adverts, force deletion of PPV events and prevent copying of PPV movies to VCR/DVDR via Macrovision but I'm not sure what restrictions are currently in place.
EDIT to add that the DVD+R format will be upgraded to around 8-9Gb in the spring. You may want to wait for this format to appear in set top recorders then you can either buy the latest and greatest or maybe save a little on one of the 4.7Gb models.
[Edited by class_A - 12/30/2003 8:28:20 AM]
Providing you subscribe to two premium channels (sports or movies) then the £10 subscription is waivered. You also get DD5.1 optical out for hooking up to your processor. A lot of the movies are now broadcast in DD.
The quality is probably slightly better as well. Sky+ records the MPEG2 bitstream as it comes off the satellite, rather than having to convert to analogue, pass to DVD Recorder and recompress as MPEG2 to write to the disc.
Sky+ allows you to watch one Sky channel whilst recording another.
You can also easily upgrade the HDD to a larger capacity, although this obviously invalidates the warranty.
I've had a TiVO for 2 years and would miss a lot of the features a PVR provides if I had to switch back to traditional recording.
The only downside with Sky+ over a standalone product is that Sky retain control of the programmes as it is a closed system. The software will allow them to prevent FFWD of adverts, force deletion of PPV events and prevent copying of PPV movies to VCR/DVDR via Macrovision but I'm not sure what restrictions are currently in place.
EDIT to add that the DVD+R format will be upgraded to around 8-9Gb in the spring. You may want to wait for this format to appear in set top recorders then you can either buy the latest and greatest or maybe save a little on one of the 4.7Gb models.
[Edited by class_A - 12/30/2003 8:28:20 AM]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post