The *real* reason for going into Iraq ...
27 June 2003, 10:15 AM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to PopBitch 
1. The Kuwaiti government paid $20 billion to USA
to "take out" Saddam Hussein. (Pays for Bush's
tax cuts and could help him get re-elected.) The
Iraq war was therefore the most expensive hired
hit in history.
2. Saddam and his sons were killed on day nine.
3. Al Qaeda had no involvement in Iraq - the
Kuwaiti has met with Osama Bin Laden since the
war and reports that Osama is delighted that
Saddam's been dispensed with.
4. The good news is Iran and Syria are safe.
No-one wants to pay Bush to attack them. Yet.
Sounds plausible to me .... or at least as plausible as any other justification I've heard
1. The Kuwaiti government paid $20 billion to USA
to "take out" Saddam Hussein. (Pays for Bush's
tax cuts and could help him get re-elected.) The
Iraq war was therefore the most expensive hired
hit in history.
2. Saddam and his sons were killed on day nine.
3. Al Qaeda had no involvement in Iraq - the
Kuwaiti has met with Osama Bin Laden since the
war and reports that Osama is delighted that
Saddam's been dispensed with.
4. The good news is Iran and Syria are safe.
No-one wants to pay Bush to attack them. Yet.
Sounds plausible to me .... or at least as plausible as any other justification I've heard
27 June 2003, 10:19 AM
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This was obvious top everyone without an American accent, funnily enough, in the tape the US Govt used to "prove" the link between bin Laden and Saddam, Osama called Saddam an "evil infidel" and called for the end of his reign, but he was morally in favour of Saddam standing against the west as he was defending an Arab state against the american pig-dogs
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM