Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Governments New £1million Advertising Campaign

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07 January 2003, 09:21 AM
  #1  
DRUNKNORGY
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
DRUNKNORGY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

To raise awareness of the dangers to children in Internet Chat rooms.
Do you think they are spending enough ?
Old 07 January 2003, 09:27 AM
  #2  
ProperCharlie
Scooby Regular
 
ProperCharlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Do you think it will make the slightest bit of difference?
Old 07 January 2003, 09:29 AM
  #3  
ChrisB
Moderator
 
ChrisB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Staffs
Posts: 23,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I had to laugh yesterday when some Home Office minister was on about putting 'Panic Buttons' in chat rooms.

Erm, okay!
Old 07 January 2003, 09:47 AM
  #4  
ChrisB
Moderator
 
ChrisB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Staffs
Posts: 23,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

How much advertising do you get for £1 million ?.
On prime time TV, fap all I expect.
Old 07 January 2003, 09:49 AM
  #5  
druddle
Scooby Regular
 
druddle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 5,528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The advert certainly gets the point across but the best bit of advice was Carol Vorderman on GMTV yesterday.

"Take the PC out of the bedroom and into a family room".

Makes sense really. I know you cant watch kids all the time but if its in a room where others are and can look at it they are less likely to engage in conversations.

Dave
Old 07 January 2003, 10:15 AM
  #6  
Devil's Refugee
Scooby Regular
 
Devil's Refugee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The wife was telling me about that programme last night and some of the stories made me shiver
Old 07 January 2003, 10:20 AM
  #7  
BuRR
Scooby Regular
 
BuRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Was Wakefield, now London
Posts: 5,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I deal with this every day guys. Not nice.
Old 07 January 2003, 10:25 AM
  #8  
ChrisB
Moderator
 
ChrisB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Staffs
Posts: 23,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Do you think it will work BuRR?

Obviously needs addressing, but when ministers come up with ideas like panic buttons, I get the idea they are out of their depth.
Old 07 January 2003, 10:27 AM
  #9  
BuRR
Scooby Regular
 
BuRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Was Wakefield, now London
Posts: 5,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

No - not really.

I think they need to get some legislation in place to outlaw "grooming" and some other aspects that I'm not going to go into as it may compromise my work.
Old 07 January 2003, 10:33 AM
  #10  
Mice_Elf
Scooby Regular
 
Mice_Elf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 17,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

PCs should have a wee box connected to them that scans in your fingerprints. When you first get the PC you scan in the entire family and input their ages...then to log on, you re-scan and it allows you access to your age-level (set by the parents, or AOL if you're too scared to tell your children what not to look at... )

Then, it will only allow you into specific age-orientated chat rooms. Of course, this will only work if paedophiles don't create an account with an age of 13, of course...
Old 07 January 2003, 10:35 AM
  #11  
ChrisB
Moderator
 
ChrisB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Staffs
Posts: 23,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

That's fair enough BuRR.

I get the feeling you guys who are working with these cases on a daily basis have ideas drawn from years of experience but no one consults you...
Old 07 January 2003, 10:38 AM
  #12  
DRUNKNORGY
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
DRUNKNORGY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

My 9 year old has been into these rooms before now and told people she was 15. The first thing they ask is A/S/L (Age,Sex/Location).

I was livid
Old 07 January 2003, 10:39 AM
  #13  
MATTeL
Scooby Regular
 
MATTeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Carnetix, Adams and Nitosport
Posts: 12,602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Biometeric security devices are available (SONY Puppy and some Toshiba laptops) that use fingerprint security.

The Puppy (I have no idea why they called it that) even checks for blood flow.

However I don't see the need for this level of security on a home PC.

What is wrong with watching the kids? Like it has been said before bring the PC in a family room. Educate the kids into the dangers and keep an eye on them, be an active parent!

Use the BIOS password if you don't trust them (sad state of affairs) not to sneak on to the PC without permission.
Old 07 January 2003, 10:41 AM
  #14  
ChrisB
Moderator
 
ChrisB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Staffs
Posts: 23,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

There's going to be more than one household where the kids know more about the PC and using it than the parents...
Old 07 January 2003, 10:55 AM
  #15  
DRUNKNORGY
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
DRUNKNORGY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Its not the lock on the PC which I think is neccessary, Its awareness by the kids that there are grown men using these rooms and they really have no idea who is using them. Just as the kids create this fantasy persona, its also a risk that others do as well. I don't want to restrict access to the net for my kids as its a part of their future, I am just not happy with this aspect of it.
Old 07 January 2003, 10:58 AM
  #16  
Mice_Elf
Scooby Regular
 
Mice_Elf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 17,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Trouble is, PCs play too much a part of children's lives these days... There are loads of instances where instead of looking something up in an Encyclopaedia, for instance, they go to Encarta and copy and paste without actually reading anything. A friend of mine is a teacher and he once had 23 essays about Henry VIII handed to him all nigh on identical...

Old 07 January 2003, 11:01 AM
  #17  
Mice_Elf
Scooby Regular
 
Mice_Elf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 17,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

There's not much you CAN do, to be honest, about protecting children from perverts and paedophiles... Watching what they do, or bringing it into the family room is an option, but you're still not going to be able to watch EVERYthing they do. Restricting the time they are on the net is another option which doesn't have much merit, either.

It's basically a question of trust and good judgement about how mature your children are. Some of these paedophiles can be awfully convincing and as family life is suffering, more children turn to friendship away from the core.
Old 07 January 2003, 11:15 AM
  #18  
brickboy
Scooby Regular
 
brickboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

There is quite a lot you can do: as other have said, PC in a family room. D/L software like Cyber Patrol or similar, you can get up to 6 month free trials. No measures are foolproof but it all helps.

I've worked with web filtering people on a project for the Police obscene publications units and some of the stuff found on known child **** haunts is beyond belief.
Old 07 January 2003, 11:23 AM
  #19  
MrDeference
Scooby Regular
 
MrDeference's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The onus is on the parent. Educating parents is the only way forwards because they have to set up and maintain the perimeter.
Unfortunately some parents will never step up to the task (along with a million other things they will fail to do for their children), believing it is society's duty to raise their child for them.
Old 07 January 2003, 01:56 PM
  #20  
DRUNKNORGY
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
DRUNKNORGY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Agree about the onus being on the parent, but I think its a fine line between being oppressive and overbearing to your kids and being protective in their eyes. How will they ever learn to deal with situations unless they confront them. Its difficult to sit over your child and monitor their conversations without being seen a interfering, This will put up a wall of mistrust from the child which will give the parent even less of an idea of what their kids get up to on or offline. I made my kids sit through the advert last night and the attitude was 'yea ! ok dad whatever' but they were shocked by the grown man with the childs voice'. If it makes them realise this could be the case, they like many other children who use the net will realise that there is risk involved in handing out personal info.
Old 07 January 2003, 01:58 PM
  #21  
Mice_Elf
Scooby Regular
 
Mice_Elf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 17,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Agreed - you can molly-coddle your child too much and then they are faced with the big outside world with not one iota of a clue as to how to deal with it. It's a bit like germs, I guess - have to have a modicum of exposure to build up an immunity.
Old 07 January 2003, 02:37 PM
  #22  
marty_t3
Scooby Regular
 
marty_t3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I think some folk are taking it a bit too far.

Most chat programs have a history so you can look back over what your kid has been up to (ie ICQ/MSN/Yahoo). Turn off the scripting in the browser and most other chat sessions won't work, thus restricting the chat use to one with recordable history. Use something like cyberpatrol to restrict the type of sites that can be visitied and the pc is then pretty safe for a kid to use.

If this "panic button" idea goes ahead.. can you imagine how many people will be pushing it for a laugh or because someone has pissed them off with a few flames.

Nothing is going to harm the kid sitting in front of the PC... it's when the kid leaves the safety of the house that you need to worry. If a kid is old enough to leave the house on their own then they are old enough to understand the dangers of meeting "strangers" from the internet.

I met my girlfriend in a chat room, we've been together for 2 years and have just started a family. I'm not going to stop my kid getting the benefits of the internet.

Stopping kids using chat rooms because of some bad cases is like stopping them learning to drive because some people crash.
Old 07 January 2003, 03:07 PM
  #23  
ChrisB
Moderator
 
ChrisB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Staffs
Posts: 23,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

If this "panic button" idea goes ahead..
I'm intrigued what happens when it's pushed...
Old 07 January 2003, 03:08 PM
  #24  
Mice_Elf
Scooby Regular
 
Mice_Elf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 17,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

PC explodes.
Old 07 January 2003, 03:30 PM
  #25  
dsmith
Scooby Regular
 
dsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 4,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Chris

I think the plan is that a big scary moderator tunrs up to keep an eye on whats happening.

Nice to see we're already protected here

Deano
Old 07 January 2003, 03:50 PM
  #26  
Bajie
Scooby Regular
 
Bajie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

What about NetNanny software etc.
Keep this on track. My littl'un will soon be using the pc [under supervision].
Amazingly, I never thought about him copy/pasting things from Encarta or World Book ...
Old 07 January 2003, 04:09 PM
  #27  
ChristianR
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
ChristianR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 6,329
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

Why not just ban the internet for anyone under the age of 16? And if a child is caught on the net under that age, prosecute the parents for not being responsible enough!!
Old 07 January 2003, 09:07 PM
  #28  
DRUNKNORGY
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
DRUNKNORGY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

ChristianR
Following your assertion would mean punishing the victims, not the perpetrators, so it doesn't really hold much water.
It would also be similar to what happens in countries where many unwanted pregnancies are caused by certain factions of the community holding their young people in ignorance through religious oppression.
Old 01 July 2003, 09:39 AM
  #29  
DRUNKNORGY
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
DRUNKNORGY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

How much advertising do you get for £1 million ?.
Kids are very gullible !. It seems to me that many of these teen chatrooms are full of deceit. The kids lie about their age to each other.
Don't know about the panic button, sounds unworkable.

Education of the parents is just as important IMHO.

[Edited by DRUNKNORGY - 1/7/2003 9:40:29 AM]
Old 01 July 2003, 11:59 AM
  #30  
druddle
Scooby Regular
 
druddle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 5,528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

You can get biometric keyboards that have fingerprint security, as [/url=http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/rl/peripherals/keyboards/kbpcid.html]Fujitsu Siemens[/url] do one.

All the security is done thru Windows (i have done it with 2000 and XP).

Dave

[Edited by druddle - 1/7/2003 12:02:09 PM]
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dpb
Non Scooby Related
14
03 October 2015 10:37 AM
alcazar
Non Scooby Related
7
02 October 2015 06:08 PM
IanG1983
Car Care
5
23 September 2015 08:50 PM
drsrst2zvh
ScoobyNet General
7
23 September 2015 07:37 PM



Quick Reply: Governments New £1million Advertising Campaign



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:59 AM.