Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

More doping, and Radcliffe on the defence...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09 September 2015, 08:09 AM
  #1  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,032
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default More doping, and Radcliffe on the defence...

Very quick on the denial of any doping claims before anyone pointed a finger at her:
http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/athletics/34190297

Well, except me a few years ago: https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby...a#post10762459

Tip of iceberg IMO.

Last edited by ALi-B; 09 September 2015 at 08:11 AM.
Old 09 September 2015, 08:15 AM
  #2  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

good job we live in a Guilty until proven innocent society or they would get away with it,,,,,,, hang on

Suspicion isn't guilt, they even say 'The evidence is not proof of doping'
Old 09 September 2015, 08:24 AM
  #3  
urban
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
urban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Never you mind
Posts: 12,566
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I really hope she's not taking drugs. Same with Bolt/Farah/Jess Ennis as I believe they're genuinely clean

On the other hand, the sport is really going to take a beating here the more they dig.
However, do they really have a chance at catching anyone, given Lance Armstrongs history of avoidance.

Last edited by urban; 09 September 2015 at 08:25 AM.
Old 09 September 2015, 08:37 AM
  #4  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by urban
However, do they really have a chance at catching anyone, given Lance Armstrongs history of avoidance.
it must be noted that Armstrong was allowed to get away with it, in part, due to the collusion of the cycling world governing body

one sincerely hopes that world athletics does not act in the same way - and I don't think so tbh
Old 09 September 2015, 08:56 AM
  #5  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I think it's really difficult to prove or dis-prove due to the amount of naturally occurring "performance enhancers" anyone remember the ginseng scandal with Linford Christy.

Then there's the fact that people that do cheat go to extra-ordinary levels to hide the fact, even some of the drugs being used to cheat being un-traceable after 24hrs, so does that mean everyone involved in sport has to give a urine sample every morning, I doubt that would be workable, also how do they test for new drugs that they don't even know exist.

As for Paula Radcliffe being on the defensive, no doubt some nice journalist called her and said "how do you feel about being implicated in doping in the commons today" and off we go, scandal started.
Old 09 September 2015, 08:58 AM
  #6  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Very quick?

She was interviewed 2 weeks ago. Thought I was seeing double. , the BBC have habit doing this it seems
Old 09 September 2015, 09:06 AM
  #7  
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
andy97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Posts: 6,296
Received 118 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

I believe Paula Radcliffe is/has been totally clean. A staunch advocate of doping. It was cheap shot by an MP using parliament privileged to make comments about the era Paula was at her prime.

Where do you draw the line for performance enhancing food/drugs. At one end just eating quality protein, carbohydrates and vegetables could be deemed enhancing or synthetic drugs manufactured specifically for enhanced performance?

Last edited by andy97; 09 September 2015 at 09:07 AM.
Old 09 September 2015, 09:19 AM
  #8  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
I believe Paula Radcliffe is/has been totally clean. A staunch advocate of doping. It was cheap shot by an MP using parliament privileged to make comments about the era Paula was at her prime.

Where do you draw the line for performance enhancing food/drugs. At one end just eating quality protein, carbohydrates and vegetables could be deemed enhancing or synthetic drugs manufactured specifically for enhanced performance?

Lance armstrong is a classic example. In his era the highest finishing rank person in the tours he won to still not have been found to fail a test is 11th.

When its that endemic do you ban or accept it? Body building has two champs, one natural, one enhanced (steroids or what ever drugs)
Old 09 September 2015, 09:28 AM
  #9  
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
andy97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Posts: 6,296
Received 118 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

He did fail a test but the result was suppressed by UCI
Old 09 September 2015, 09:33 AM
  #10  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
He did fail a test but the result was suppressed by UCI
who?
Old 09 September 2015, 10:05 AM
  #11  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
who?
cycling's world governing body
Old 09 September 2015, 10:22 AM
  #12  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
cycling's world governing body
no no as in who did UCI cover up? lance armstrong?
Old 09 September 2015, 10:43 AM
  #13  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

It all seemed to be an industry of covering up, in an attempt save face and le tour reputation
Like fifa, but with far less cash floating around
Old 09 September 2015, 11:12 AM
  #14  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
no no as in who did UCI cover up? lance armstrong?
Hein Verbruggen

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hein_Verbruggen

and

Pat McQuaid

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_McQuaid
Old 09 September 2015, 11:30 AM
  #15  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2

totlay missed what i was asking, are we talking about lance armstrong here, or just doping general?
Old 09 September 2015, 12:22 PM
  #16  
Devildog
Scooby Regular
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Away from this place
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
I believe Paula Radcliffe is/has been totally clean. A staunch advocate of doping. It was cheap shot by an MP using parliament privileged to make comments about the era Paula was at her prime.

Where do you draw the line for performance enhancing food/drugs. At one end just eating quality protein, carbohydrates and vegetables could be deemed enhancing or synthetic drugs manufactured specifically for enhanced performance?
You do actually know what "advocate" means?
Old 09 September 2015, 12:51 PM
  #17  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
totlay missed what i was asking, are we talking about lance armstrong here, or just doping general?
lol, - yes Lance Armstrong had his doping covered up (by the UCI)

I hope the World Athletics Governing body are not as corrupt
Old 09 September 2015, 12:58 PM
  #18  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Ah yeah, was a proper inside job. but they covered it all up at that time.

TO be fair i do think he's had a bum wrap comapred to how otehrs have been tretaed.
Old 09 September 2015, 01:16 PM
  #19  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,341
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

The Athletics people may not be actively covering-up, but the evidence does seem to be mounting that they're turning a blind eye to what should be pretty bleeding obvious.

Cycling is the new clean, who woulda thunk it.
Old 09 September 2015, 01:18 PM
  #20  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

ermmm he was intent on securing his business intrests and at the same time screwing over others !
Old 09 September 2015, 01:31 PM
  #21  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markjmd
The Athletics people may not be actively covering-up, but the evidence does seem to be mounting that they're turning a blind eye to what should be pretty bleeding obvious.

Cycling is the new clean, who woulda thunk it.
still firing accusations around though, look at chris frome and whats hes had to endure
Old 09 September 2015, 04:26 PM
  #22  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
Ah yeah, was a proper inside job. but they covered it all up at that time.

TO be fair i do think he's had a bum wrap comapred to how otehrs have been tretaed.
i think the undeniably harsh treatment of Lance imo has more to do with his aggressive denials, pursuit of people who accused him of doping through the courts, ruining of fellow riders careers, total lack of remorse etc etc

creating a whole "nexus" of cheating/doping around him

rather than simple "yes I doped"
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Martin2005
Non Scooby Related
144
23 May 2014 08:41 PM
SiPie
Non Scooby Related
169
23 October 2012 03:47 PM
Markus
Non Scooby Related
1
11 September 2007 02:52 AM



Quick Reply: More doping, and Radcliffe on the defence...



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:56 PM.