Notices

Engine size advice (RCM build 500 bhp)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05 July 2010, 08:12 PM
  #1  
F1 CJE UK
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
F1 CJE UK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MK
Posts: 4,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation Engine size advice (RCM build 500 bhp)

Hi guys i am looking for advice, i am mid project to build a very fast reliable road car / toy with around 500bhp.

https://www.scoobynet.com/members-ga...rcm-style.html

The original plan was to build a 2.35 with the above spec ^. However due to the good condition of my block and to keep within my budget RCM have advised me to go with a 2.5l build. The car is not going to be used day to day just for fast road use and maybe a few track days, I really wanted something that can rev hard all the way. Maximum fun not necessarily the fastest option.

Can someone advice me of the pros and cons of the engine options so i have a little knowledge to go back to RCM with?


Thanks guys
Old 05 July 2010, 08:50 PM
  #2  
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
ZEN Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

First of all I would trust the judgement of Matt and Olly, and merely be guided by what you may read here.

I would seriously consider a 2.5 build aimed at high 400hp level (ie 475+). With what you have planned for the 2.35, and equivalent (block aside) build would be very nice to drive and depending on how far you go with the heads, free revving. Based on my experience of standard 2.5 blocks, that is relatively safe power level to aim for and it has been done many times by a number of different tuners. Some go as high as 500hp and they are possibly okay if the mileage and usage are sympathetic to the engine.

However if you want to get near the levels of low down torque of the 2.5 but with a solid 550hp and reliability, then the 2.35 is really the only way to go. Given your 2.5 heads, 2.1 or 2.0 engines are really out of the question unless you purchase some new 2.0 N/A head castings to go with the smaller block.

Realistically, if you want to do this and you simply can't afford the 2.35, the 2.5 will still give you many smiles per mile, even if the piece of paper that goes with it has a slightly smaller number printed in the corner.
Old 05 July 2010, 09:40 PM
  #3  
F1 CJE UK
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
F1 CJE UK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MK
Posts: 4,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks for the advice paul, how do the two sizes drive. will the 2.35 rev higher and stronger, comming from a 2.5 wrx with lots of low down power but no real top end.
i think the plan was to use a sti block but re use some part of my wrx unit.
Old 06 July 2010, 09:33 PM
  #4  
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
ZEN Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They are very close, and with the AVCS of your car, the 2.35 will spool nicely, probably the same as a 2.5 non AVCS car, but the 2.35 will always lack a tiny bit of off boost performance.

A fair few people still end up with 500+ on a 2.5 and go onto enjoy many miles of perfect reliability. If the money saved enables a proper overall package to be put together in one co-ordinated effort, it will be the best move in the long term.
Old 06 July 2010, 09:39 PM
  #5  
P1 Daveyboy
Scooby Regular
 
P1 Daveyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In the land of nod
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know nothing about engine building but Fiestaboy does check this out all his own work

https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-...-the-dyno.html
Old 06 July 2010, 09:44 PM
  #6  
frayz
Essex Area Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (7)
 
frayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: "Engineering Perfection in Essex"
Posts: 19,945
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Very good advise offered there by Paul.

Id agree and go with a 2.5l. For that power target it will be awesome. Matt and Olly are not likely to steer you wrong.
Old 06 July 2010, 10:58 PM
  #7  
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
ZEN Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not quite all his own work!

Originally Posted by P1 Daveyboy
I know nothing about engine building but Fiestaboy does check this out all his own work

https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-...-the-dyno.html
Old 07 July 2010, 12:38 AM
  #8  
Mus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Mus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: will be back in another scooby in time....
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

might be a good idea if some one local to you can take you for a spin, ive got a 2.5 and to be honest couldnt ask for anymore for a fast road car. if your going to do a 2.35 you might aswel do head work slap a nice blower and the list wont stop. 2.5 will make a cracking road car.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ATWRX
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
88
01 February 2016 07:28 PM
blockhead
Subaru Parts
19
07 November 2015 11:50 PM
Nick71
General Technical
21
20 September 2015 03:52 PM
lloydsound
ScoobyNet General
9
14 September 2015 05:34 PM



Quick Reply: Engine size advice (RCM build 500 bhp)



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:04 AM.