Notices

Type-R Remap, only making 285bhp....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11 May 2010, 06:34 PM
  #1  
oxscooby
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
oxscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bicester
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Type-R Remap, only making 285bhp....

Took the car to Zen Performance today to remap the apexi power Fc as Id had a few upgrades done. Paul did a great job and was very helpful and the car does feel quick and responsive, Im just a little bit disappointed with the power produced. The car has a Vf35 turbo, full 3inch de-cat, autobahn88 TMIC, walbro fuel pump and a recent engine re-build. It produced a max figure of 285.6bhp @ 5,805rpm and 294.3lbft @ 4,222rpm. Boost max was 1.5 bar. Anybody had similar power with these sort of mods?

http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t...scooby/077.jpg

Last edited by oxscooby; 11 May 2010 at 07:15 PM. Reason: pic
Old 11 May 2010, 06:38 PM
  #2  
FB Tuning
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (30)
 
FB Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: FB Tuning Workshop - HP27
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd expect to be seeing more power at 1.5 bar - Was that boost held out right through the rev range, or does it tail off at the top?

What did Paul reckon about it?

Have you got a Power/Torque/Boost/AFR graph that you can post up?

Last edited by FB Tuning; 11 May 2010 at 06:39 PM.
Old 11 May 2010, 06:42 PM
  #3  
oxscooby
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
oxscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bicester
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The boost does tail off to about 1.1-1.2 bar. Will see if i can post up the graph. Paul said it may be the vf35 but he wasnt sure.
Old 11 May 2010, 06:46 PM
  #4  
FB Tuning
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (30)
 
FB Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: FB Tuning Workshop - HP27
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Change back to your VF24 and tweak the map to find out if that's the issue
Old 11 May 2010, 07:15 PM
  #5  
oxscooby
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
oxscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bicester
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

would do but i sold it to a bloke in austria
Old 11 May 2010, 07:39 PM
  #6  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Looks like the autobahn TMIC is the issue - Paul looks to have reduced boost to account for the very poor job that the tmic does in charge cooling.

Great torque though and that is what counts.

get a fmic and you will see a good increase I reckon (or even fit a proper tmic)
Old 11 May 2010, 07:51 PM
  #7  
pooeater
Scooby Regular
 
pooeater's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

vf35/1.8bar
gems ecu
fmic
inducion k&n
full H&S exhaust
gt spec headers/uppipe
740cc inj
forge actuator
forged 2.0l built by ZEN
made 350bhp/390lbft
hope this helps
Old 11 May 2010, 08:24 PM
  #8  
scoobiewrx555
Scooby Regular
 
scoobiewrx555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Oxscooby...What size injectors are you running?? 440cc??

It might even be your injectors are maxing out because he is running it rich due to potentially as duncan says, the inneficiency of your autobahn fmic.

Peak power on the VF35 is around 5,500rpm with peak torque around 4200-4,500rpm. That's par for the course and your graph is as expected. I used to run a VF35 and made c.350bhp at c.20psi (1.37bar) but that was with 550cc injectors and an STi TMIC.
Old 11 May 2010, 08:58 PM
  #9  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hi mate,personally i would also be a little dissapointed,i would say the intercooler/turbo is probably the issue,if the turbo is ok,then i would have thought that the autobahn as mentioned above is restricting it.

im running stock uk99 turbo 2000 engine.
vf35 (1.42 bar)
ninja sports cat downpipe
decat centre(2.5")
custom h&s 3" backbox
walbro pump
afpr
sti8 tmic
3 port boost solinoid.
ecutek

car produced 315/320,bere in mind that its still on standard headers/up pipe and oe 440cc injectors. hope that helps a little.
Old 11 May 2010, 09:16 PM
  #10  
oxscooby
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
oxscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bicester
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Right, im gonna stick the original topmount back on and see if it feels any different. Thanks for the advice guys.
Old 11 May 2010, 09:17 PM
  #11  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I dont think the original will be better - needs a good fmic
Old 11 May 2010, 09:20 PM
  #12  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dynamix
I dont think the original will be better - needs a good fmic
or sti8 tmic
Old 11 May 2010, 09:21 PM
  #13  
scoobiewrx555
Scooby Regular
 
scoobiewrx555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

On a classic fmic is the way to go, it's better than faffing about fitting a larger TMIC and as Duncan says, the standard tmic may not be any better.

Spend some proper money abd get one of those Hybrid fmic jobbys. I hear they are very good.
Old 11 May 2010, 09:25 PM
  #14  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

agreed,but when u say faffing about fitting sti8 tmic,its very easy to fit,.i opted for the sti8 tmic as i didnt want the front mount look on the front of the car. its a good intercooler and a good choice if u dont want to change the look of the car.....think they can cope with around 350bhp?
Old 11 May 2010, 09:34 PM
  #15  
oxscooby
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
oxscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bicester
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I didn't really want to go down the fmic route as I've had them on previous scoob's & didn't like the extra lag
Old 11 May 2010, 09:34 PM
  #16  
scoobiewrx555
Scooby Regular
 
scoobiewrx555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

STi TMIC will cope with over 400bhp+. I'm putting 360-370 though mine at the moment amd it copes very nicely.

I'm thinking v1-v4 classics and major faffing about with larger TMIC's but later 5/6 cars use something similar to the newage WRX TMIC so STi will fit straight on. That's would be a good alternative.
Old 11 May 2010, 09:38 PM
  #17  
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
99greenwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scoobiewrx555
STi TMIC will cope with over 400bhp+. I'm putting 360-370 though mine at the moment amd it copes very nicely.

I'm thinking v1-v4 classics and major faffing about with larger TMIC's but later 5/6 cars use something similar to the newage WRX TMIC so STi will fit straight on. That's would be a good alternative.
Old 12 May 2010, 09:44 AM
  #18  
Claaarkio
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Claaarkio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The mapper would have been able to tell you if the intercooler wasn't up to the job as each run would have produced less power as the heat soak effect took place.

Are we sure this just isn't power at the wheels rather than the fly ?
Old 12 May 2010, 09:51 AM
  #19  
pooeater
Scooby Regular
 
pooeater's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what fuel u putting in?
Old 12 May 2010, 12:41 PM
  #20  
oxscooby
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
oxscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bicester
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm using v-power. It's definitely the power at the wheels
Old 12 May 2010, 12:47 PM
  #21  
belliott69
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
belliott69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: www.surreyscoobies.co.uk
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thats good power then i'd say mate, flywheel power will be quite a bit over 300. also how does it drive, remember there only pub figures and all rolling roads will tell you a different power to what another one will, its how it drives.
Old 12 May 2010, 12:48 PM
  #22  
Claaarkio
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Claaarkio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oxscooby
I'm using v-power. It's definitely the power at the wheels
About right then, not bad power at all.

dave
Old 12 May 2010, 12:56 PM
  #23  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oxscooby
...It's definitely the power at the wheels
Are you sure, though?! I'm sure the graph does actually show corrected flywheel bhp. , because had mine mapped there and it showed 282bhp on the print out, which is defo flywheel bhp (as I'm only running v.1 slanty TMIC/380cc inj at the mo).

But if it is wheel bhp, then you're okay - as the corrected flywheel figure will indeed be around 356bhp! (i.e. if allowing for a c.20% tranny loss).

Last edited by joz8968; 12 May 2010 at 01:14 PM.
Old 12 May 2010, 12:58 PM
  #24  
Claaarkio
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Claaarkio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This should be the first question when talking about plotted power graphs, hense it was my first question on the post!

Power at the wheels is always more acurate as the fly wheel power is an educated guess, but it sounds better which is why we all like it so much!

Last edited by Claaarkio; 12 May 2010 at 01:00 PM.
Old 12 May 2010, 05:47 PM
  #25  
oxscooby
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
oxscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bicester
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry guys, wheel power is 248.2bhp, engine hp is 285.6
Old 12 May 2010, 06:16 PM
  #26  
jameswrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
jameswrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Kent
Posts: 6,535
Received 40 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Torque is nice and you've got a good length power band there. I'd rather have that graph than (for example) a more 'pub friendly' 310bhp peak at 7krpm (with short band) and 260ftlb torque.
Old 12 May 2010, 06:19 PM
  #27  
scoobiewrx555
Scooby Regular
 
scoobiewrx555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Most tuners with RR dyno's will give you corrected figures reflecting estimated engine bhp. I think Paul's Dastek Dyno normally gives slightly pessimistic figures or it's the way Paul has it set up, so you may be closer to 300 engine bhp on somehting like a Dyno Dynamics RR. RR operators though can and sometimes do massage the figures to make it look good. Paul at Zen doesn't fall into that category.
Old 12 May 2010, 06:43 PM
  #28  
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
harvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Darlington
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Do it right and do it once.
Hybrid FMIcs from £270. Job sorted.
Old 12 May 2010, 06:55 PM
  #29  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oxscooby
Sorry guys, wheel power is 248.2bhp, engine hp is 285.6
I was "convinced" that was indeed the case lol


I'd be prepared to condemn the Ab88 IC - eps. with it being 'only' a TMIC to boot! It appears to be limiting airfow/charge temps a la the crappy OEM v.1/2 slanty job!

As harvs says, whack on one of his Hybrid FMICs.

Or if you must have a TM, then defo fit an STi Blobeye one (or Hawkeye, if they fit). At least you know where you stand with these OEM TMICs...

Last edited by joz8968; 12 May 2010 at 07:04 PM.
Old 13 May 2010, 11:26 AM
  #30  
Claaarkio
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Claaarkio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The AB88 FMIC seem to work if you want a cheap FM. My bro got 491bhp at 1.5 bar on his 2.5 motor. I got 301 on my last RR at 1bar (2.0 TD05) with the same FMIC.

Dave
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frizzle-Dee
Essex Subaru Owners Club
13
01 December 2015 09:37 AM
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM
makkink
General Technical
10
01 October 2015 05:41 PM
alcazar
Non Scooby Related
37
27 September 2015 10:35 PM
shorty87
Other Marques
0
25 September 2015 08:52 PM



Quick Reply: Type-R Remap, only making 285bhp....



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:46 PM.