what can i expect from 302bhp and 448nm torque
16 October 2006, 04:15 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what can i expect from 302bhp and 448nm torque
I am just curious as to what my Sti My03 perfoms like now!! It certainly feels alot faster and keeps pulling forever!
It now has 302bhp and 448 nm of torque or 331 ft lbs. Prodrive sports cat, decat second pipe and straight through centre section, prodrive backbox and uprated fuel pump!
Will i be matching the performance figures of say the WR1?
I think i must be near the 4 sec mark for 0-60 and god knows what midrange power!
Anyone have the same setup as me and done timed runs or anything like that.
thanks
It now has 302bhp and 448 nm of torque or 331 ft lbs. Prodrive sports cat, decat second pipe and straight through centre section, prodrive backbox and uprated fuel pump!
Will i be matching the performance figures of say the WR1?
I think i must be near the 4 sec mark for 0-60 and god knows what midrange power!
Anyone have the same setup as me and done timed runs or anything like that.
thanks
16 October 2006, 04:31 PM
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 335 bhp 325lb at scoobyclinic 2006
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
whatever you have it wont be enough for long!! I would say low 5's to be realistic on a 0 to 60 but it will be plenty quick enough till you get duffed up by another motor. then you will want 400bhp then 450 etc etc etc. Its like a drug man
16 October 2006, 08:53 PM
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Carmarthenshire
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Standard WR1 is 316bhp , Sti with ppp 305bhp , figures from prodrive given for an 03 sti with ppp on 18 inch alloys as 0 - 62mph as 4.6 sec .
figures from subaru from a standard wr1 are 0 - 60mph as 4.25 sec .
Not much in it really .
figures from subaru from a standard wr1 are 0 - 60mph as 4.25 sec .
Not much in it really .
16 October 2006, 09:29 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Isnt it torque that really counts!!!
Originally Posted by Manic Mav
Sorry mate,but i think you are going to have to spend a bit more to even get close to a WR1
I notice that my torque figure is somewhat more than the WR1!!!
420 Nm @ 4000 compared to 448 nm @ 4600
only about 10bhp down and lots more torque must make a difference!!! I actually dont care one way or the other! Just curious! My Sti was remapped with Ecutek software too.
Last edited by siggy; 16 October 2006 at 09:35 PM.
16 October 2006, 09:41 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: garthorpe
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Accor ding to WRC WRC Technologies - SUBARU WRX/STi - 03/05 STi - WRC 350 Add APS High flow I/C and Cold air intake - youve got 350 bhp + more torque
will require another ECUTEK map - should be better than WR1 then
will require another ECUTEK map - should be better than WR1 then
16 October 2006, 09:55 PM
#7
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
even close to a WR1!!
Originally Posted by Manic Mav
Sorry mate,but i think you are going to have to spend a bit more to even get close to a WR1
Did you get the problems with your car sorted!! funnily enough when i took mine to be remapped it was overboosting and had symptons similar to yours!! the cause was it had been remaped before then taken off and put back to factory! but as powerengineering expalined the ecu's learn over time and can leave the overboost effect.
Trending Topics
17 October 2006, 01:51 AM
#8
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: workshop tel: 01787 275074
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mark3evo
Accor ding to WRC WRC Technologies - SUBARU WRX/STi - 03/05 STi - WRC 350 Add APS High flow I/C and Cold air intake - youve got 350 bhp + more torque
will require another ECUTEK map - should be better than WR1 then
will require another ECUTEK map - should be better than WR1 then
not from my experience - sticking with the STi intercooler is a far better option than the APS interwarmer.
17 October 2006, 10:55 AM
#9
Sti intercooler has been used to 400bhp+ on many cars.
The VF35 turbo is at it's flow limits around 330bhp (regardless of what it can be stretched beyond it's limits to), trying to change other supporting mods to make the last bit of power is really just pissing into the wind.
Dave
The VF35 turbo is at it's flow limits around 330bhp (regardless of what it can be stretched beyond it's limits to), trying to change other supporting mods to make the last bit of power is really just pissing into the wind.
Dave
17 October 2006, 01:22 PM
#10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Half way up
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
YouTube - ktj 60-100 oct06
This is what mid-range acceleration is like running a VF35 on MY 05 WRX (dd'd @348x333 with an STI TMIC and usual mods etc)..
This is what mid-range acceleration is like running a VF35 on MY 05 WRX (dd'd @348x333 with an STI TMIC and usual mods etc)..
17 October 2006, 02:15 PM
#11
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jasonius
YouTube - ktj 60-100 oct06
This is what mid-range acceleration is like running a VF35 on MY 05 WRX (dd'd @348x333 with an STI TMIC and usual mods etc)..
This is what mid-range acceleration is like running a VF35 on MY 05 WRX (dd'd @348x333 with an STI TMIC and usual mods etc)..
The VF35 set up is very good isn't it
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KK3960
General Technical
3
07 October 2015 12:33 PM