Notices

Apexi power Fc query

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13 July 2005, 12:43 PM
  #1  
Jamie_B
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Jamie_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Derby
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Apexi power Fc query

On the Apexi commander display which sensor is the MAF shown as? I'm hoping its the one shown as bst1(1.35V) and not AF-1(0.8V).

Any help would be appreciated as I'm trying to find out why it's running rich

Thanks,

Jamie
Old 13 July 2005, 12:55 PM
  #2  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It is easier to look under the Monitor - airflow and it will be displayed in Mv.

Should be something like 1100 on idle although varies.

You haven't by chance gone into the settings - airflow and moved up or down looking at the different intake options have you? it will automatically choose the one you leave it on, you don;t need to press next to select it.. this will make it very rich if you choose a higher option number than you have fitted etc.. ie. standard intake and you select 2.

Simon
Old 13 July 2005, 01:50 PM
  #3  
Jamie_B
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Jamie_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Derby
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
It is easier to look under the Monitor - airflow and it will be displayed in Mv.

Should be something like 1100 on idle although varies.

You haven't by chance gone into the settings - airflow and moved up or down looking at the different intake options have you? it will automatically choose the one you leave it on, you don;t need to press next to select it.. this will make it very rich if you choose a higher option number than you have fitted etc.. ie. standard intake and you select 2.

Simon
Thanks Simon, I'll check it later. I haven't been near the settings since it was mapped so nothing should have changed. I've just had a new STI9 short motor fitted,unless that has changed something?

Jamie
Old 13 July 2005, 02:05 PM
  #4  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It was mapped on the previous motor??

I think the short motor from sti9 will alter the squish area depending on head gaskets used.
Old 13 July 2005, 07:21 PM
  #5  
Jamie_B
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Jamie_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Derby
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its currently reading 820mV on idle, does this sound like my mafs gone?
Old 13 July 2005, 07:29 PM
  #6  
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
banny sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Type R
Posts: 16,598
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

That sounds about right, because thats what my car reads on idle too and it is running spot on
Old 13 July 2005, 10:07 PM
  #7  
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
ZEN Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

bst1 is the factory map sensor
bst2 is boost control kit map sensor (reads 0 unless fitted)
02-1 is lambda
AF-1 is Air Flow meter ie MAF sensor
Old 14 July 2005, 09:51 AM
  #8  
Jay m A
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Jay m A's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Paul, (or anyone)

can you explain how the PFC sees bst1 and bst2? Is it via the same input, (and you have to configure it) or is there another loom for bst2.

I have a my93-96 PFC and am using a MY97 MAP sensor. It is under-reading the boost (1.4 bar on the boost gauge = 0.9kg/cm2 on the PFC). Is there any way of getting the PFC to read it correctly?

I can't get my head round the Apexi MAP sensor allowing boost over 1.1 on the early ones, if the OE MAP max's at 5v for 1.1 bar - how does the apexi MAP get around this, and can I do the same with the MY97 MAP I have?

hope that makes sense
Old 14 July 2005, 12:44 PM
  #9  
Jamie_B
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Jamie_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Derby
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by banny sti
That sounds about right, because thats what my car reads on idle too and it is running spot on
I think I'll take it easy until Andy maps it in August. Especially as on the dyno the other day I had a det reading of 56 on the power Fc, it still made 289bhp with 260 ft/lbs of torque.
Old 14 July 2005, 06:46 PM
  #10  
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
ZEN Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jay m A
Paul, (or anyone)

can you explain how the PFC sees bst1 and bst2? Is it via the same input, (and you have to configure it) or is there another loom for bst2.

I have a my93-96 PFC and am using a MY97 MAP sensor. It is under-reading the boost (1.4 bar on the boost gauge = 0.9kg/cm2 on the PFC). Is there any way of getting the PFC to read it correctly?

I can't get my head round the Apexi MAP sensor allowing boost over 1.1 on the early ones, if the OE MAP max's at 5v for 1.1 bar - how does the apexi MAP get around this, and can I do the same with the MY97 MAP I have?

hope that makes sense
The PowerFC will fuel cut at 0.25 bar above the target boost if the boost control kit is turned on. If the boost control kit is turned off it will not do a thing.

The BST2 is for the boost control kit map sensor, it plugs in with it's own loom to the 3 pin socket on the side of the case.

Best thing you can do is put the original map sensor back in IMHO.

Paul
Old 14 July 2005, 10:28 PM
  #11  
Jay m A
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Jay m A's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Many thanks.

So could I try plugging the MY97 into the BST2 port? If so how would I tell the PFC to use BST2, is it via the commander or a simple case of leaving the OE loom for the MAP sensor unplugged.

I read somewhere that an under-read MAP has a poor effect on closed loop fuelling, if so, what is it?

Lastly, if I plug the OE MAP back in to BST1, will I still be able to get 1.4 bar? I am using a Dawes to do this at present.

uber thanks
Old 15 July 2005, 08:51 AM
  #12  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

>>Lastly, if I plug the OE MAP back in to BST1, will I still be able to get 1.4 bar? I am >>using a Dawes to do this at present.
Assuming was mapped for that or going to be then yes.
There is a warning that switches the cel on when you get to the max of the MAP sensor but I cannot get mine to come on.. lol I assume this is at 5volts but the OE sensor is not quite reaching this on my own car, despite me running upto 1.5bar, so although the sensor tops out at 1.2bar reading it is not at the full voltage range at that point iyswim.
You will need to set boost target to greater than 1.1bar (1.4bar) in the PFC even though you are not using it to control the boost as it will switch the CEL on if it is still at a low number like 1bar as MAP will probably read to 1.2bar and switch the CEL on due to over boost, it will not boost cut as you are controlling the boost with the dawes so the PFC cannot alter it.

Plugging the MY97 sensor into the BST2 socket might work but it is unlikely to be configured in the same way, and the same voltage = the same boost that it is expecting, but it might be nearer than the current situation.

The PFC is expecting the boost kit to be plugged into that.. I believe the AVCR map sensor and the boost kit are the same MAP sensor.

I have never had the need to purchase a boost kit yet as everyone uses a different form of boost control (dawes, AVCR, Hybrid etc) on the early car and any PFC I have fitted to one has involved fitting said boost control device or boost control was already fitted.

I have plugged the Apexi AVCR MAP sensor into the OE MAP wiring on my car and the plug coincidentally is the same but the wiring different or the voltage configuration different I haven't had time to estabilsh which yet.

I am intending purchasing a Sensor Harness when I place my next order of PFC's, later this month. The harness is part of the boost control kit and so will connect my AVCR map sensor into the PFC.. I just need to keep it wired into the AVCR as well on my car. Although it might be just as easy to use spade connectors onto the PFC socket.

At the end of the day it may well just be more straight forward to buy the boost control kit and sell you OE 3port to offset the cost.

As to under reading MAP sensor effecting closed loop - I can see it causing the ecu to remain in closed loop for longer.. the load won't be seen as much and so the ecu will remain in the lower load areas of the map for higher boost than it would normally.. so the closed loop could make it run leaner and det due to the boost being higher than it sees and it needing richer mixture than closed loop provides at that point.
Although the MAF reading will cause the ecu to see load but it will still be lower imho.
You can however turn closed loop off, obviously it needs to be mapped on the MY97 sensor is not already done.

You can turn the boost control kit on and off with the commander (etc, function select, boost control kit) but with it off it still reads the OE sensor from BST1, having not plugged a MAP sensor into BST2 I am assuming it would switch to this if there were a voltage on the socket.. but unsure until I try it on my car.

Simon

Last edited by Jolly Green Monster; 15 July 2005 at 08:57 AM.
Old 15 July 2005, 09:02 AM
  #13  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Oh and I agree with Paul.. plug the oe map sensor back in.
Old 15 July 2005, 10:14 AM
  #14  
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
ZEN Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Without the boost control kit actually fitted, you can't set the boost above 1 bar on the early PFC or it will throw and CEL. If you want the PFC to control the boost, the best way is to use the control kit. Although the later MAP sensor can sort of work, you need to make sure the duty is set quite accurately.

paul
Old 15 July 2005, 10:15 AM
  #15  
Jay m A
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Jay m A's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Simon and Paul

Time to play with it
Old 16 July 2005, 07:07 PM
  #16  
Jamie_B
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Jamie_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Derby
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jamie_B
Its currently reading 820mV on idle, does this sound like my mafs gone?
What reading does everyone else get?
Old 16 July 2005, 07:08 PM
  #17  
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
banny sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Type R
Posts: 16,598
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

i get a similar reading to yours on my car 97 sti v3, but i have a apexi dual funnel filter and that is the setting i have used on the commander.

Last edited by banny sti; 17 July 2005 at 02:05 PM.
Old 17 July 2005, 01:14 PM
  #18  
Tone Loc
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Tone Loc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 5,166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jamie_B
What reading does everyone else get?
Mine idles at about 1000mV

Tony.
Old 17 July 2005, 04:24 PM
  #19  
Jamie_B
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Jamie_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Derby
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tone Loc
Mine idles at about 1000mV

Tony.
Thanks Tony,

I just wanted to get some sort of average before swapping the maf.
Old 17 July 2005, 11:20 PM
  #20  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Exclamation

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
As to under reading MAP sensor effecting closed loop - I can see it causing the ecu to remain in closed loop for longer.. the load won't be seen as much and so the ecu will remain in the lower load areas of the map for higher boost than it would normally.. so the closed loop could make it run leaner and det due to the boost being higher than it sees and it needing richer mixture than closed loop provides at that point.
Simon
Simon

You are incorrect, the map sensor does not dictate whether the ECU runs closed loop or not. That is a completely different function within the ECU.

Andy
Old 18 July 2005, 08:34 AM
  #21  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Andy,

This was the only way I could see the under reading map sensor effecting closed loop.

The ecu only runs closed loop for certain areas of the map and the altered MAP reading would alter the areas of the tables the ecu used, therefore I was thinking the under reading MAP would therefore effect when the ecu went in and out of closed loop areas of the map iyswim?

I assumed it used MAP, TPS, MAF, to decide whether to use just the fuel values in the ecu tables or whether to alter them using the O2 sensor etc..

So if it doesn't use it, then how does it decide when to use closed or open loop?

No questioning you btw just interested in your opinion

Simon
Old 18 July 2005, 08:52 AM
  #22  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
Andy,

This was the only way I could see the under reading map sensor effecting closed loop.

The ecu only runs closed loop for certain areas of the map and the altered MAP reading would alter the areas of the tables the ecu used, therefore I was thinking the under reading MAP would therefore effect when the ecu went in and out of closed loop areas of the map iyswim?

I assumed it used MAP, TPS, MAF, to decide whether to use just the fuel values in the ecu tables or whether to alter them using the O2 sensor etc..

So if it doesn't use it, then how does it decide when to use closed or open loop?

No questioning you btw just interested in your opinion

Simon
The map sensor and TPS have zero input to the closed/open switch point.

This is dictated only by engine coolant temp, O2 sensor voltage (must have warmed up and exceeded 0.7v) and the 'trip' value in the fuel map.
The default for this is 1.047 ie table value of less than 1.047 and the ecu runs closed (subject to prevous qualifications) over this value and it runs open loop. This trip value is adjustable on FCDL (bet you were wondering what that bit was for )

Hope you find this helpful

Andy

ps - Remember me when you're rich and famous
Old 18 July 2005, 09:21 AM
  #23  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

lol @ being Rich and Famous.. that would only happen if I SS* my prices..

Thanks Andy

* SS = Super Size
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimBowen
ICE
5
02 July 2023 01:54 PM
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
Davalar
General Technical
19
30 September 2015 08:54 PM
ALEXSTI
General Technical
5
28 September 2015 09:29 PM
Ozne
General Technical
2
27 September 2015 03:06 PM



Quick Reply: Apexi power Fc query



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:33 AM.