td04 to td05
#1
Will the td05 fit straight on to an my97 td04 car without any work (apart from fitting)
Obviously I'll need a remap and some bigger injectors, but will that be enough?
Obviously I'll need a remap and some bigger injectors, but will that be enough?
#3
And you won't NEED bigger injectors and a remap unless you really want one or unless you are planning to run very high boost.
If I had a pound for every time I've said that.
I too have a 97 UK and am hoping to crack 350bhp in the New Year (344 at the mo) on the standard ECU and injectors, so don't believe everything you read or are told.
If I had a pound for every time I've said that.
I too have a 97 UK and am hoping to crack 350bhp in the New Year (344 at the mo) on the standard ECU and injectors, so don't believe everything you read or are told.
Trending Topics
#10
Nick,
By possessing incredible skill
It's a simple formula really. More air, more fuel and sufficient thermal management and high enough octane levels to avoid det.
I've fitted bigger turbo, bigger intercooler, bigger fuel pump and reg, the usual exhaust and induction mods, higher boost, lots of lagging and cold air supply, lots of NF and a few other clever little mods and away you go.
There's lots of threads about with my full spec on if you are interested.
Cheers
Rich
By possessing incredible skill
It's a simple formula really. More air, more fuel and sufficient thermal management and high enough octane levels to avoid det.
I've fitted bigger turbo, bigger intercooler, bigger fuel pump and reg, the usual exhaust and induction mods, higher boost, lots of lagging and cold air supply, lots of NF and a few other clever little mods and away you go.
There's lots of threads about with my full spec on if you are interested.
Cheers
Rich
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Rich,
Sorry... but..
To say std injectors and ecu is erm.. well erm.. confusing..
Fuel and boost controllers might play a part.
I seriously disagree that std injectors and std fuel pressure with pump petrol can do 350+ bhp, and I would recommend anyone reading this thread pay carefull attention to overboost, poor fuel, high egt's and weak mixtures..
Theres a lot more to tuning than winding up the boost and removing fuel cut..
Not a dig at you rich, but im just warning people, as I keep refusing to remap for 20 - 22psi on std cars.
However how many cc's of pump fuel do you think you require per bhp??
David
Sorry... but..
To say std injectors and ecu is erm.. well erm.. confusing..
Fuel and boost controllers might play a part.
I seriously disagree that std injectors and std fuel pressure with pump petrol can do 350+ bhp, and I would recommend anyone reading this thread pay carefull attention to overboost, poor fuel, high egt's and weak mixtures..
Theres a lot more to tuning than winding up the boost and removing fuel cut..
Not a dig at you rich, but im just warning people, as I keep refusing to remap for 20 - 22psi on std cars.
However how many cc's of pump fuel do you think you require per bhp??
David
#14
The ignition will be too much advanced at high revs when using a bigger turbo and more boost in combination with the standard ECU! (mixture is not too bad) If you want to try, please install a Knock Link.........
Mark.
Mark.
#15
Fair point David, you are right.
Sorry if it was misleading.
I do use a boost controller and have invested mucho dosh in safety devices, such as Electronic EGT and boost gauges with peak hold, Knocklink, Lambdalink and I've had the car checked on numerous occasions with a wideband. I do run increased fuel pressure 3.0 bar at idle, but other than the pump and reg I have no other fuelling mods other than 100ml NF per tankful.
Mark wild,
I've no site I'm afraid but if you mail me I can chat about my spec.
Cheers Rich
Sorry if it was misleading.
I do use a boost controller and have invested mucho dosh in safety devices, such as Electronic EGT and boost gauges with peak hold, Knocklink, Lambdalink and I've had the car checked on numerous occasions with a wideband. I do run increased fuel pressure 3.0 bar at idle, but other than the pump and reg I have no other fuelling mods other than 100ml NF per tankful.
Mark wild,
I've no site I'm afraid but if you mail me I can chat about my spec.
Cheers Rich
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rich,
How are you managing to run enough boost for you to see 344hp with no ignition modifications (None Listed)?
Cheers
[Edited by Delboy2 - 1/5/2004 12:49:02 PM]
How are you managing to run enough boost for you to see 344hp with no ignition modifications (None Listed)?
Cheers
[Edited by Delboy2 - 1/5/2004 12:49:02 PM]
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The OEM ECU runs a lot of advance at the top end which is why Rich gets this much BHP, however, I think he will admit that he loses out on torque compared to a remapped car.
Rich does however prove how far you can get with relatively few mods IF you know what you are doing.
Andrew...
[Edited by AndrewC - 1/5/2004 1:07:31 PM]
Rich does however prove how far you can get with relatively few mods IF you know what you are doing.
Andrew...
[Edited by AndrewC - 1/5/2004 1:07:31 PM]
#18
Exactly Andrew,
Torque is only 295lbsft at the mo, and I reckon 300 will be hard to crack without a mappable ECU.
With a Link or wotnot my torque could be well in the 300s I imagine.
Cheers
Rich
Torque is only 295lbsft at the mo, and I reckon 300 will be hard to crack without a mappable ECU.
With a Link or wotnot my torque could be well in the 300s I imagine.
Cheers
Rich
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes I agree/know the oem ecu runs alot of advance at the mid - top end but this also leads to detonation with the addition of increased boost
[Edited by Delboy2 - 1/5/2004 7:35:40 PM]
[Edited by Delboy2 - 1/5/2004 7:35:40 PM]
#21
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
If you can run enough octane and keep the air cool at higher boost, then the std ECU advance is excellent (on 95 Ra)
My 432 bhp and 365ft-lb torque at well lane was on the totally std ECU. I then spent a fortune on a mapable ecu, headers etc and added 8bhp to this figure !!
Andy
Edited to add that this was with the 20g compressor. The TD05's best was 369bhp 350ft-lbs on the std ECU
[Edited by Andy.F - 1/5/2004 8:36:44 PM]
My 432 bhp and 365ft-lb torque at well lane was on the totally std ECU. I then spent a fortune on a mapable ecu, headers etc and added 8bhp to this figure !!
Andy
Edited to add that this was with the 20g compressor. The TD05's best was 369bhp 350ft-lbs on the std ECU
[Edited by Andy.F - 1/5/2004 8:36:44 PM]
#23
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Not when it was dyno'd back then. It does now, well sort of, Pavlo has done a custom map for me. I don't think it will have much more power but the driveability is improved as it takes account of the larger injectors now. It is also very quiet on the knocklink just running Optimax and no booster.
Andy
Andy
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hedgecutter
General Technical
3
25 September 2015 02:35 PM